What Has the Sudden Unexpected Infant Death and Sudden Death in the Young Case Registry Learned About Consenting Families for DNA Banking and/or Genomic Research?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1097/PAF.0000000000000988
Heather MacLeod, Erik Buczkowski, Meghan Faulkner, Krisha Felzke, Kristin M Burns
{"title":"What Has the Sudden Unexpected Infant Death and Sudden Death in the Young Case Registry Learned About Consenting Families for DNA Banking and/or Genomic Research?","authors":"Heather MacLeod, Erik Buczkowski, Meghan Faulkner, Krisha Felzke, Kristin M Burns","doi":"10.1097/PAF.0000000000000988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Since 2015, the Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID) and Sudden Death in the Young (SDY) Case Registry has characterized sudden and unexpected deaths among young people (0-20 years). Families may provide informed consent to save biospecimens for banking and/or genomic research. We reviewed all consent-eligible cases to describe the frequency, time from death to consent, type (paper, phone, or electronic), and staffing method (Medical Examiner Office-based bereavement counselor vs outsourced genetic counselor). Of 5438 cases from January 2015 to January 2022, 3498 (64%) were eligible for consent and 391 (11%) were successfully consented. Half (54%) were obtained within 60 days of the death, 39% within 48 hours. Most were paper based (73%); 23% were obtained by phone, and 4% electronically. Consent rates varied by site from 3% to 66%. Higher consent rates were achieved within a Medical Examiner Office by a social worker or death investigator. Only 3% of consents attempted by a contracted genetic counselor were successful. Identified barriers include lack of available contact information, inability to reach family using the collected information, and lack of response when contacted. Consent rates were highest shortly after death when families were contacted by the Medical Examiner Office as part of bereavement outreach.</p>","PeriodicalId":55535,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Since 2015, the Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID) and Sudden Death in the Young (SDY) Case Registry has characterized sudden and unexpected deaths among young people (0-20 years). Families may provide informed consent to save biospecimens for banking and/or genomic research. We reviewed all consent-eligible cases to describe the frequency, time from death to consent, type (paper, phone, or electronic), and staffing method (Medical Examiner Office-based bereavement counselor vs outsourced genetic counselor). Of 5438 cases from January 2015 to January 2022, 3498 (64%) were eligible for consent and 391 (11%) were successfully consented. Half (54%) were obtained within 60 days of the death, 39% within 48 hours. Most were paper based (73%); 23% were obtained by phone, and 4% electronically. Consent rates varied by site from 3% to 66%. Higher consent rates were achieved within a Medical Examiner Office by a social worker or death investigator. Only 3% of consents attempted by a contracted genetic counselor were successful. Identified barriers include lack of available contact information, inability to reach family using the collected information, and lack of response when contacted. Consent rates were highest shortly after death when families were contacted by the Medical Examiner Office as part of bereavement outreach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿意外猝死和幼儿猝死病例登记处在同意家庭进行 DNA 库和/或基因组研究方面学到了什么?
摘要:自2015年起,婴儿意外猝死(SUID)和青少年猝死(SDY)病例登记处对青少年(0-20岁)的猝死和意外死亡进行了特征描述。家属可在知情的情况下同意保存生物样本用于银行和/或基因组研究。我们审查了所有符合同意条件的病例,以描述其频率、从死亡到同意的时间、类型(纸质、电话或电子)和人员配置方法(法医办公室的丧亲咨询师与外包的遗传咨询师)。在 2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月的 5438 例病例中,3498 例(64%)符合同意条件,391 例(11%)成功获得同意。半数(54%)在死亡后 60 天内获得,39% 在 48 小时内获得。大多数同意书是纸质的(73%);23%是通过电话获得的,4%是通过电子方式获得的。同意率因地点而异,从 3% 到 66% 不等。在法医办公室内,由社会工作者或死亡调查员取得的同意率较高。只有 3% 的同意由签约的遗传咨询师成功完成。已发现的障碍包括缺乏可用的联系信息、无法使用收集到的信息联系到家人以及联系后缺乏回应。死亡后不久,法医办公室作为丧亲外展活动的一部分与家属联系时,同意率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drawing on the expertise of leading forensic pathologists, lawyers, and criminologists, The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology presents up-to-date coverage of forensic medical practices worldwide. Each issue of the journal features original articles on new examination and documentation procedures. While most articles are available as web based articles, PDF and in ePub reader format, some earlier articles do not have PDFs available. If you would like to view an article in the ePub format, you will need to download an ePub reader to view this file, a number of which are available for free online.
期刊最新文献
Lethal Self-Administration of Atracurium: A Rarely Reported Case with Review of Literature. What Has the Sudden Unexpected Infant Death and Sudden Death in the Young Case Registry Learned About Consenting Families for DNA Banking and/or Genomic Research? Conduction System Hamartoma: Autopsy Case Series. TASER 7 and TASER 10 Probe Penetration Into Human Skull Simulants. Do Not Turn a Blind Eye on Forensic Biochemistry: Using Vitreous Electrolytes to Reveal Renal Insufficiency as Cause of Death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1