Clinical impact of multiple pectus bars on surgical outcomes following pectus excavatum repair.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae168
Naoyuki Oka, Kyohei Masai, Yu Okubo, Kaoru Kaseda, Tomoyuki Hishida, Keisuke Asakura
{"title":"Clinical impact of multiple pectus bars on surgical outcomes following pectus excavatum repair.","authors":"Naoyuki Oka, Kyohei Masai, Yu Okubo, Kaoru Kaseda, Tomoyuki Hishida, Keisuke Asakura","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Nuss procedure, a minimally invasive surgery for pectus excavatum, has undergone various improvements. However, the impact of using multiple bars on thoracic shape changes and surgical outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum between August 2014 and September 2021. We divided the patients into 2 groups based on the number of bars placed and identified differences in surgical outcomes and morphological characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 225 patients were evaluated, of whom 132 were classified into the ≤2 bar group (using 1 or 2 bars) and 93 into the ≥3 bar group (using 3 or more bars). There was no difference in the preoperative Haller index [median (interquartile range), 4.59 (3.67-6.16) vs 4.67 (4.12-6.14), P = 0.227], and asymmetric excavatum was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (81% vs 51%, P < 0.001). The preoperative sternal torsion angle was larger in the ≥3 bar group, but no difference was found between the 2 groups postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative complications (≥grade 3) was comparable between groups (10% vs 17%, P = 0.105); however, postoperative pleurisy was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (12% vs 4%, P = 0.021). In univariable and multivariable analyses, ≥3 bar placement was the only risk factor for postoperative pleurisy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of multiple bars (≥3 bars) is useful for the correction of asymmetric pectus excavatum, but attention should be paid to the potential risk of postoperative pleurisy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11479710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Nuss procedure, a minimally invasive surgery for pectus excavatum, has undergone various improvements. However, the impact of using multiple bars on thoracic shape changes and surgical outcomes remains unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum between August 2014 and September 2021. We divided the patients into 2 groups based on the number of bars placed and identified differences in surgical outcomes and morphological characteristics.

Results: A total of 225 patients were evaluated, of whom 132 were classified into the ≤2 bar group (using 1 or 2 bars) and 93 into the ≥3 bar group (using 3 or more bars). There was no difference in the preoperative Haller index [median (interquartile range), 4.59 (3.67-6.16) vs 4.67 (4.12-6.14), P = 0.227], and asymmetric excavatum was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (81% vs 51%, P < 0.001). The preoperative sternal torsion angle was larger in the ≥3 bar group, but no difference was found between the 2 groups postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative complications (≥grade 3) was comparable between groups (10% vs 17%, P = 0.105); however, postoperative pleurisy was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (12% vs 4%, P = 0.021). In univariable and multivariable analyses, ≥3 bar placement was the only risk factor for postoperative pleurisy.

Conclusions: The placement of multiple bars (≥3 bars) is useful for the correction of asymmetric pectus excavatum, but attention should be paid to the potential risk of postoperative pleurisy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多条褶皱条对切除褶皱修复术后手术效果的临床影响。
目的:Nuss 手术是一种治疗胸廓外翻的微创手术,经过了各种改进。然而,使用多根横杆对胸廓形状变化和手术效果的影响仍不清楚:我们回顾性评估了 2014 年 8 月至 2021 年 9 月间接受 Nuss 手术治疗胸肌下垂的患者。我们根据放置横杠的数量将患者分为两组,并确定了手术结果和形态特征的差异:共对 225 例患者进行了评估,其中 132 例被归入≤2 根横杠组(使用 1 或 2 根横杠),93 例被归入≥3 根横杠组(使用 3 根或更多横杠)。术前霍勒指数没有差异(中位数[四分位数间距],4.59 [3.67-6.16] vs 4.67 [4.12-6.14],P = 0.227),≥3 条组更常观察到非对称性腹股沟(81% vs 51%,P 结论:≥3 条组更常观察到非对称性腹股沟(81% vs 51%,P 结论:≥3 条组更常观察到非对称性腹股沟):放置多根横杠(≥3 根横杠)有助于矫正不对称的胸肌下垂,但应注意术后胸膜炎的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The application of mechanical side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis in the reconstruction of digestive tract after esophagectomy in the beagle model. Robotic Thoracic Surgery: Current Landscape and Future Directions. Transcatheter valve replacement in carcinoid heart disease: A potential change of paradigm. Commissural prolapse: combining the best from two aortic valve repair techniques. A retrospective long-term follow-up of the randomized study: Total endoscopic ablation of patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1