Lateral atrial septal defect closure with induced ventricular fibrillation versus cardioplegic arrest.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae128
Henning Carstens, Daniel Biermann, Jörg Sachweh, Martin Munz, Ida Hüners, Rainer Kozlik-Feldmann, Michael Hübler
{"title":"Lateral atrial septal defect closure with induced ventricular fibrillation versus cardioplegic arrest.","authors":"Henning Carstens, Daniel Biermann, Jörg Sachweh, Martin Munz, Ida Hüners, Rainer Kozlik-Feldmann, Michael Hübler","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally invasive surgical closure of atrial septal defects is gaining widespread acceptance and can be performed via a right midaxillary thoracotomy. In addition, the procedure can be performed in ischaemic cardiac arrest or fibrillation with a core body temperature between 34°C and 36°C.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We present our single-centre results of paediatric patients who underwent surgical atrial septal defect II closure via lateral thoracotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into a cardiac arrest group and a cardiac fibrillation group. All procedures were performed via right midaxillary thoracotomy through a single incision without side ports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 37 consecutive patients between March 2019 and August 2022 (median age 3 years; percentile 25th: 2; 75th: 5 years) in both groups were free of mortality and postoperative morbidity such as haemodynamically relevant residual shunt or malignant arrhythmias. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly shorter in the fibrillation group (mean: 34.7 min vs 52.6 min, P = 0.01), and all patients were weaned off the ventilator immediately postoperatively. Length of the intensive care unit stay was not different between the 2 groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with cardiac arrest (mean: 5.6 days vs 4.9 days, P = 0.04). Postoperative laboratory parameters did not differ between the 2 groups. All patients were discharged with normal left ventricular function and normalized cardiac enzymes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive closure of an atrial septal defect during atrial fibrillation is a safe procedure with results comparable to those of an induced cardiac arrest procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgical closure of atrial septal defects is gaining widespread acceptance and can be performed via a right midaxillary thoracotomy. In addition, the procedure can be performed in ischaemic cardiac arrest or fibrillation with a core body temperature between 34°C and 36°C.

Objectives: We present our single-centre results of paediatric patients who underwent surgical atrial septal defect II closure via lateral thoracotomy.

Methods: Retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into a cardiac arrest group and a cardiac fibrillation group. All procedures were performed via right midaxillary thoracotomy through a single incision without side ports.

Results: All 37 consecutive patients between March 2019 and August 2022 (median age 3 years; percentile 25th: 2; 75th: 5 years) in both groups were free of mortality and postoperative morbidity such as haemodynamically relevant residual shunt or malignant arrhythmias. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly shorter in the fibrillation group (mean: 34.7 min vs 52.6 min, P = 0.01), and all patients were weaned off the ventilator immediately postoperatively. Length of the intensive care unit stay was not different between the 2 groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with cardiac arrest (mean: 5.6 days vs 4.9 days, P = 0.04). Postoperative laboratory parameters did not differ between the 2 groups. All patients were discharged with normal left ventricular function and normalized cardiac enzymes.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive closure of an atrial septal defect during atrial fibrillation is a safe procedure with results comparable to those of an induced cardiac arrest procedure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用诱导心室颤动与心脏停搏进行侧房间隔缺损闭合术。
微创手术封堵房间隔缺损正被广泛接受,该手术可通过右腋中切口进行。此外,该手术可在缺血性心脏骤停或心颤且核心体温在 34-36 °C 之间时进行:我们展示了单中心通过侧胸廓切开术进行 ASD II 闭合手术的儿科患者的结果:方法:回顾性分析。患者分为心脏骤停组和心脏纤颤组。所有手术均通过右腋中胸廓切开术进行,单切口,无侧孔:2009年3月3日至2022年8月8日期间,两组的37名连续患者(中位年龄3岁;百分位数第25位:2岁;第75位:5岁)均无死亡病例和术后发病,如血流动力学相关的残余分流或恶性心律失常。纤颤组的心肺旁路时间明显缩短(平均:34.7 分钟对 52.6 分钟,P 0.01),所有患者术后均立即脱离呼吸机。两组患者在重症监护室的住院时间没有差异。心脏骤停患者的术后住院时间明显更长(平均:5.6 天 vs 4.9 天,P 0.04)。两组患者的术后实验室指标没有差异。所有患者出院时左心室功能正常,心肌酶恢复正常:结论:心房颤动时微创关闭房间隔缺损是一种安全的手术,其效果与诱导性心脏骤停手术相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of superior trunk brachial plexus injury after right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve repair. Association between preoperative D-dimer with morphologic features and surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection. Defining the causes for Fontan circulatory failure in total cavopulmonary connection patients. Risk of neurologic events after surgery for mitral valve insufficiency and concomitant cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. A nationwide register-based study. Robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation for inappropriate sinus tachycardia: a world-first approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1