Not all types of depressed patients who persist with their antidepressant treatment improve in side effect complaints: A comparison of treatment completers and dropouts in the STAR*D trial.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1111/acps.13764
Thomas T Kim, Colin Xu
{"title":"Not all types of depressed patients who persist with their antidepressant treatment improve in side effect complaints: A comparison of treatment completers and dropouts in the STAR*D trial.","authors":"Thomas T Kim, Colin Xu","doi":"10.1111/acps.13764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a \"traditional belief\" that antidepressant side effect complaints improve with medication persistence; however, support for this theory has remained inconclusive. We aimed to examine if side effect complaints improved over time by modeling the relationship between side effect complaints and time at dropout for patients receiving citalopram during the first level of acute treatment in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We categorized the 2833 patients into five patterns by week of dropout. We used pattern-mixture modeling to model change in side effect complaints (frequency, intensity, and burden) over the 12-week course of treatment, while accounting for attrition and depressive severity. Using post-hoc linear contrasts, we compared the attrition patterns with the completers' pattern for severity of side effect complaints at each respective last visit prior to dropout as well as averaged side effect complaints across the duration of treatment. We also reported frequencies and tolerability of side effects for nine organ/function systems over the course of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who dropped out early exhibited worsening side effect burden and patients who dropped out later showed improvements in side effect frequency and intensity. Treatment completers improved in all side effect complaints over the course of treatment. Early attrition patterns had more severe side effect complaints for both tests of post-hoc linear contrasts than later attrition patterns and completers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Side effect complaints from antidepressant treatment improve over time, but only for some types of patients. As a precaution for early dropout, clinicians should monitor patients who exhibit worsening and more severe side effect complaints-especially in the first 6 weeks of antidepressant treatment. In addition, clinicians may want to consider changing the type of treatment early on for these patients, rather than encouraging them to persist with their current medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a "traditional belief" that antidepressant side effect complaints improve with medication persistence; however, support for this theory has remained inconclusive. We aimed to examine if side effect complaints improved over time by modeling the relationship between side effect complaints and time at dropout for patients receiving citalopram during the first level of acute treatment in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial.

Methods: We categorized the 2833 patients into five patterns by week of dropout. We used pattern-mixture modeling to model change in side effect complaints (frequency, intensity, and burden) over the 12-week course of treatment, while accounting for attrition and depressive severity. Using post-hoc linear contrasts, we compared the attrition patterns with the completers' pattern for severity of side effect complaints at each respective last visit prior to dropout as well as averaged side effect complaints across the duration of treatment. We also reported frequencies and tolerability of side effects for nine organ/function systems over the course of treatment.

Results: Patients who dropped out early exhibited worsening side effect burden and patients who dropped out later showed improvements in side effect frequency and intensity. Treatment completers improved in all side effect complaints over the course of treatment. Early attrition patterns had more severe side effect complaints for both tests of post-hoc linear contrasts than later attrition patterns and completers.

Conclusions: Side effect complaints from antidepressant treatment improve over time, but only for some types of patients. As a precaution for early dropout, clinicians should monitor patients who exhibit worsening and more severe side effect complaints-especially in the first 6 weeks of antidepressant treatment. In addition, clinicians may want to consider changing the type of treatment early on for these patients, rather than encouraging them to persist with their current medication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并非所有类型的抑郁症患者在坚持接受抗抑郁治疗后,副作用症状都有所改善:STAR*D试验中完成治疗者与退出治疗者的比较。
简介有一种 "传统观念 "认为,抗抑郁药物的副作用投诉会随着服药时间的延长而改善;然而,对这一理论的支持仍然没有定论。我们的目的是通过模拟 "缓解抑郁的序贯治疗替代方案(STAR*D)"试验中接受西酞普兰治疗的患者在第一级急性治疗期间的副作用投诉与停药时间之间的关系,来研究副作用投诉是否会随着时间的推移而改善:我们将 2833 名患者按辍药周数分为五种模式。我们使用模式-混合模型来模拟12周疗程中副作用主诉(频率、强度和负担)的变化,同时考虑到自然减员和抑郁严重程度。通过事后线性对比,我们比较了自然减员模式和完成者模式在辍学前最后一次就诊时的副作用症状严重程度,以及整个治疗期间的平均副作用症状。我们还报告了治疗过程中九个器官/功能系统的副作用频率和耐受性:结果:早期退出治疗的患者副作用负担加重,而后期退出治疗的患者副作用频率和强度有所改善。在治疗过程中,完成治疗者的所有副作用症状都有所改善。在两次事后线性对比测试中,早期退出者的副作用症状都比后期退出者和治疗完成者严重:结论:随着时间的推移,抗抑郁治疗的副作用症状会有所改善,但仅限于某些类型的患者。为防止患者过早退出治疗,临床医生应监测那些副作用症状加重的患者,尤其是在抗抑郁治疗的前 6 周。此外,临床医生可能会考虑尽早为这些患者更换治疗类型,而不是鼓励他们坚持使用现有药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor Concerning "Glucagon-Like Peptide Agonists for Weight Management in Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Prediction of electroconvulsive therapy outcome: A network analysis approach. How to treat antipsychotic-related weight gain and metabolic disturbances: Is there a role for GLP-1 receptor agonists? Issue Information Variation of subclinical psychosis as a function of population density across different European settings: Findings from the multi-national EU-GEI study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1