Comment on ‘Total Magnesium Intake and Risk of Frailty in Older Women’ by Struijk Et Al.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1002/jcsm.13592
Long Guo, Qing Lan, Ming Zhou, Fei Liu
{"title":"Comment on ‘Total Magnesium Intake and Risk of Frailty in Older Women’ by Struijk Et Al.","authors":"Long Guo,&nbsp;Qing Lan,&nbsp;Ming Zhou,&nbsp;Fei Liu","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We recently read an article by Struijk et al. [<span>1</span>] published in the <i>Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle</i> entitled ‘Total Magnesium Intake and Risk of Frailty in Older Women’. This study provides valuable insight into the relationship between magnesium intake and risk of frailty in older women, with particular emphasis on the importance of dietary magnesium. I commend the authors for their thorough analysis and use of a large cohort study spanning several decades, which greatly strengthens the findings. However, there are a few points that I think deserve further discussion in order to round out this important study.</p><p>Firstly, in the article, the authors considered the effect of supplement use on the results of the study and adjusted for the use of magnesium supplements in the statistical analyses. However, there are several factors that need further consideration here that may affect the robustness of the study results. In the study, the data spanned a large period of time (1984 to 2010) and significant changes in healthcare and socio-economic conditions during this period may have introduced heterogeneity in the results. In addition, the formulations, brands and usage of supplements on the market may have changed over time and there may be instances where actual intake cannot be accurately captured. Future studies could therefore use mixed effects modelling or time series analysis to mitigate the impact of time variation on the results.</p><p>In addition, although the authors have adjusted for a variety of confounders, such as lifestyle, medication use and dietary factors, there are still a number of potential confounders that could have an impact on the robustness of the results. For example, previous studies have suggested that supplement users may already have certain health problems or concerns about future health [<span>2</span>], which may motivate them to use supplements more frequently. It is therefore difficult to determine whether the frailty outcomes are due to the effects of the supplements or to these underlying health problems. In addition, mental health status [<span>3</span>], social support [<span>4</span>] or environmental factors [<span>5</span>] may also influence the onset and progression of frailty. Future studies could consider using stratified analyses or taking these potential factors into account as covariates. Exploring these factors in depth would help to better understand the observed differences and provide stronger support for the reliability of the findings.</p><p>This also emphasizes the important role of social workers in the research and prevention of frailty syndromes, particularly in the older population. Through direct assistance, community involvement and support, and health promotion as well as lectures, social workers provide comprehensive support to older people to help them stay healthy and delay or prevent the onset of frailty. In addition, social workers work closely with professionals in the medical, nutritional and psychological fields to ensure that older persons receive comprehensive health management. This interdisciplinary collaboration allows for more effective prevention and management of frailty syndromes and improves the overall effectiveness of interventions.</p><p>In conclusion, the study by Struijk et al. provides an important foundation for a deeper understanding of the association between magnesium intake and frailty risk in older women [<span>1</span>]. However, to further enhance the accuracy and broad applicability of this study, we suggest that future research should place a greater emphasis on the temporal effects of supplement use and other potential confounders. At the same time, we also emphasize the key role of social workers in tackling frailty syndromes, who, through multilevel support and interdisciplinary collaboration, can significantly improve the health status and quality of life of older people. We believe that these recommendations will help future studies to achieve more comprehensive results in revealing the relationship between magnesium intake and frailty.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":48911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"15 6","pages":"2873-2874"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13592","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We recently read an article by Struijk et al. [1] published in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle entitled ‘Total Magnesium Intake and Risk of Frailty in Older Women’. This study provides valuable insight into the relationship between magnesium intake and risk of frailty in older women, with particular emphasis on the importance of dietary magnesium. I commend the authors for their thorough analysis and use of a large cohort study spanning several decades, which greatly strengthens the findings. However, there are a few points that I think deserve further discussion in order to round out this important study.

Firstly, in the article, the authors considered the effect of supplement use on the results of the study and adjusted for the use of magnesium supplements in the statistical analyses. However, there are several factors that need further consideration here that may affect the robustness of the study results. In the study, the data spanned a large period of time (1984 to 2010) and significant changes in healthcare and socio-economic conditions during this period may have introduced heterogeneity in the results. In addition, the formulations, brands and usage of supplements on the market may have changed over time and there may be instances where actual intake cannot be accurately captured. Future studies could therefore use mixed effects modelling or time series analysis to mitigate the impact of time variation on the results.

In addition, although the authors have adjusted for a variety of confounders, such as lifestyle, medication use and dietary factors, there are still a number of potential confounders that could have an impact on the robustness of the results. For example, previous studies have suggested that supplement users may already have certain health problems or concerns about future health [2], which may motivate them to use supplements more frequently. It is therefore difficult to determine whether the frailty outcomes are due to the effects of the supplements or to these underlying health problems. In addition, mental health status [3], social support [4] or environmental factors [5] may also influence the onset and progression of frailty. Future studies could consider using stratified analyses or taking these potential factors into account as covariates. Exploring these factors in depth would help to better understand the observed differences and provide stronger support for the reliability of the findings.

This also emphasizes the important role of social workers in the research and prevention of frailty syndromes, particularly in the older population. Through direct assistance, community involvement and support, and health promotion as well as lectures, social workers provide comprehensive support to older people to help them stay healthy and delay or prevent the onset of frailty. In addition, social workers work closely with professionals in the medical, nutritional and psychological fields to ensure that older persons receive comprehensive health management. This interdisciplinary collaboration allows for more effective prevention and management of frailty syndromes and improves the overall effectiveness of interventions.

In conclusion, the study by Struijk et al. provides an important foundation for a deeper understanding of the association between magnesium intake and frailty risk in older women [1]. However, to further enhance the accuracy and broad applicability of this study, we suggest that future research should place a greater emphasis on the temporal effects of supplement use and other potential confounders. At the same time, we also emphasize the key role of social workers in tackling frailty syndromes, who, through multilevel support and interdisciplinary collaboration, can significantly improve the health status and quality of life of older people. We believe that these recommendations will help future studies to achieve more comprehensive results in revealing the relationship between magnesium intake and frailty.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就 Struijk 等人撰写的 "老年妇女的镁总摄入量与虚弱风险 "发表评论
我们最近阅读了Struijk等人发表在《恶病质、肌肉减少症和肌肉》杂志上的一篇文章,题为《老年妇女的总镁摄入量和虚弱风险》。这项研究为老年妇女镁摄入量与虚弱风险之间的关系提供了有价值的见解,特别强调了饮食中镁的重要性。我赞扬作者们的深入分析和使用跨越几十年的大型队列研究,这极大地加强了研究结果。然而,为了完成这项重要的研究,我认为有几点值得进一步讨论。首先,在文章中,作者考虑了补充剂使用对研究结果的影响,并在统计分析中对镁补充剂的使用进行了调整。然而,这里有几个因素需要进一步考虑,它们可能会影响研究结果的稳健性。在这项研究中,数据跨越了很长一段时间(1984年至2010年),在此期间医疗保健和社会经济条件的重大变化可能导致了结果的异质性。此外,市场上补充剂的配方、品牌和用法可能会随着时间的推移而改变,可能存在无法准确捕捉实际摄入量的情况。因此,未来的研究可以使用混合效应模型或时间序列分析来减轻时间变化对结果的影响。此外,尽管作者已经调整了各种混杂因素,如生活方式、药物使用和饮食因素,但仍有许多潜在的混杂因素可能对结果的稳健性产生影响。例如,先前的研究表明,补充剂使用者可能已经有某些健康问题,或者担心未来的健康问题,这可能促使他们更频繁地使用补充剂。因此,很难确定这些虚弱的结果是由于补充剂的影响还是由于这些潜在的健康问题。此外,心理健康状况[3]、社会支持[4]或环境因素[5]也可能影响虚弱的发生和发展。未来的研究可以考虑使用分层分析或将这些潜在因素作为协变量考虑在内。深入探讨这些因素将有助于更好地理解所观察到的差异,并为研究结果的可靠性提供更有力的支持。这也强调了社会工作者在研究和预防脆弱综合症方面的重要作用,特别是在老年人中。通过直接援助、社区参与和支持、促进健康以及讲座,社会工作者为老年人提供全面支持,帮助他们保持健康,延缓或预防身体虚弱的发生。此外,社会工作者与医疗、营养和心理领域的专业人员密切合作,确保老年人得到全面的健康管理。这种跨学科合作可以更有效地预防和管理虚弱综合征,并提高干预措施的总体有效性。总之,Struijk等人的研究为深入了解老年妇女镁摄入量与衰弱风险之间的关系提供了重要的基础。然而,为了进一步提高本研究的准确性和广泛适用性,我们建议未来的研究应更加强调补充剂使用的时间效应和其他潜在的混杂因素。与此同时,我们还强调社会工作者在处理脆弱综合症方面的关键作用,他们通过多层次支助和跨学科合作,可以显著改善老年人的健康状况和生活质量。我们相信这些建议将有助于未来的研究在揭示镁摄入量和虚弱之间的关系方面取得更全面的结果。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
12.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to publishing materials related to cachexia and sarcopenia, as well as body composition and its physiological and pathophysiological changes across the lifespan and in response to various illnesses from all fields of life sciences. The journal aims to provide a reliable resource for professionals interested in related research or involved in the clinical care of affected patients, such as those suffering from AIDS, cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic lung disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney failure, rheumatoid arthritis, or sepsis.
期刊最新文献
Mitochondrial Adaptations in Skeletal Muscle Following Incretin-Based Therapies: In Vitro Impaired Adipose Anabolism in Pancreatic Cancer Cachexia Is Reversed by HuR Inhibition Inhibition of N-Terminal Acetyltransferase C Mitigates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress–Mediated Muscle Atrophy in Cancer Cachexia Effects of Diactive-1–Supported Progressive Resistance Training on Body Composition in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Multi-Parametric MRI Approach at 3 T and 7 T for Assessing Skeletal Muscle Pathology in Myofibrillar Myopathies: A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1