The Right Ventricular-Arterial Compliance Index: A Novel Hemodynamic Marker to Predict Right Heart Failure Following Left Ventricular Assist Device.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002280
Ning Song, Sara L Hungerford, Sumita Barua, Katherine L Kearney, Kavitha Muthiah, Christopher S Hayward, David W M Muller, Audrey I Adji
{"title":"The Right Ventricular-Arterial Compliance Index: A Novel Hemodynamic Marker to Predict Right Heart Failure Following Left Ventricular Assist Device.","authors":"Ning Song, Sara L Hungerford, Sumita Barua, Katherine L Kearney, Kavitha Muthiah, Christopher S Hayward, David W M Muller, Audrey I Adji","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of right heart failure (RHF) in patients with advanced heart failure following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains difficult to predict. We proposed a novel composite hemodynamic index-the right ventricular-arterial compliance index (RVACi), derived from pulmonary artery pulse pressure (PAPP), ejection time (ET), heart rate (HR), and cardiac output (CO), with and expressed as mm Hg·s/L. We then conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis comparing the predictive value of RVACi for the development of RHF or unplanned right ventricular (RV) mechanical circulatory support following LVAD implantation against existing hemodynamic indices. One hundred patients were enrolled after screening 232 patients over a 10 year period, with 74 patients having complete hemodynamic data for RVACi calculation. There was good correlation between pulmonary arterial capacitance (R² = 0.48) and pulmonary vascular resistance (R² = 0.63) with RVACi, but not RV stroke work index or pulmonary artery pulsatility index. Reduced baseline RVACi (52 ± 23 vs. 92 ± 55 mm Hg·s/L; p = 0.02) was the strongest hemodynamic predictor of unplanned RV mechanical circulatory support requirement in patients following LVAD insertion. Composite pulsatile hemodynamic indices including RVACi may provide additional insight over existing hemodynamic indices for the prediction of RHF and need for RV mechanical circulatory support.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of right heart failure (RHF) in patients with advanced heart failure following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains difficult to predict. We proposed a novel composite hemodynamic index-the right ventricular-arterial compliance index (RVACi), derived from pulmonary artery pulse pressure (PAPP), ejection time (ET), heart rate (HR), and cardiac output (CO), with and expressed as mm Hg·s/L. We then conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis comparing the predictive value of RVACi for the development of RHF or unplanned right ventricular (RV) mechanical circulatory support following LVAD implantation against existing hemodynamic indices. One hundred patients were enrolled after screening 232 patients over a 10 year period, with 74 patients having complete hemodynamic data for RVACi calculation. There was good correlation between pulmonary arterial capacitance (R² = 0.48) and pulmonary vascular resistance (R² = 0.63) with RVACi, but not RV stroke work index or pulmonary artery pulsatility index. Reduced baseline RVACi (52 ± 23 vs. 92 ± 55 mm Hg·s/L; p = 0.02) was the strongest hemodynamic predictor of unplanned RV mechanical circulatory support requirement in patients following LVAD insertion. Composite pulsatile hemodynamic indices including RVACi may provide additional insight over existing hemodynamic indices for the prediction of RHF and need for RV mechanical circulatory support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右心室-动脉顺应性指数:预测左心室辅助装置术后右心衰竭的新型血液动力学标志物
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后,晚期心力衰竭患者的右心衰竭(RHF)发展仍难以预测。我们提出了一种新的复合血液动力学指数--右心室-动脉顺应性指数(RVACi),该指数由肺动脉脉压(PAPP)、射血时间(ET)、心率(HR)和心输出量(CO)得出,并以毫米汞柱-秒/升表示。然后,我们进行了一项回顾性单中心分析,比较 RVACi 与现有血液动力学指标对植入 LVAD 后发生 RHF 或意外右心室 (RV) 机械循环支持的预测价值。在 10 年间筛选了 232 名患者后,100 名患者被纳入其中,其中 74 名患者拥有完整的血液动力学数据,可用于计算 RVACi。肺动脉电容(R² = 0.48)和肺血管阻力(R² = 0.63)与 RVACi 有很好的相关性,但与 RV 搏动功指数或肺动脉搏动指数没有相关性。基线 RVACi 降低(52 ± 23 vs. 92 ± 55 mm Hg-s/L;p = 0.02)是插入 LVAD 后患者需要非计划 RV 机械循环支持的最强血流动力学预测因素。包括 RVACi 在内的综合搏动血流动力学指数可能比现有的血流动力学指数更能预测 RHF 和对 RV 机械循环支持的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
期刊最新文献
Prosthetic Valve Fate in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Heart Transplantation Outcomes in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the Era of Mechanical Circulatory Support. Predictive Accuracy of HeartMate 3 Risk Score After the Heart Transplant Allocation Change. Reply Letter to Editor to Daniel Schneditz. Impella as Bridge to Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1