Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1177/02692155241268373
Thomas Gerard, Florian Naye, Simon Decary, Pierre Langevin, Chad Cook, Nathan Hutting, Marylie Martel, Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
{"title":"Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review.","authors":"Thomas Gerard, Florian Naye, Simon Decary, Pierre Langevin, Chad Cook, Nathan Hutting, Marylie Martel, Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme","doi":"10.1177/02692155241268373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors pertaining to neck pain from systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search on PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL was performed on June 27, 2024. Additional grey literature searches were performed.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella review and included systematic reviews reporting the prognostic factors associated with non-specific or trauma-related neck pain and cervical radiculopathy. Prognostic factors were sorted according to the outcome predicted, the direction of the predicted outcome (worse, better, inconsistent), and the grade of evidence (Oxford Center of Evidence). The predicted outcomes were regrouped into five categories: pain, disability, work-related outcomes, quality of life, and poor outcomes (as \"recovery\"). Risk of bias analysis was performed with the ROBIS tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 884 citations from three databases, read 39 full texts, and included 16 studies that met all selection criteria. From these studies, we extracted 44 prognostic factors restricted to non-specific neck pain, 47 for trauma-related neck pain, and one for cervical radiculopathy. We observed that among the prognostic factors, most were associated with characteristics of the condition, cognitive-emotional factors, or socio-environmental and lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified over 40 prognostic factors associated mainly with non-specific neck pain or trauma-related neck pain. We found that a majority were associated with worse outcomes and pertained to domains mainly involving cognitive-emotional factors, socio-environmental and lifestyle factors, and the characteristics of the condition to predict outcomes and potentially guide clinicians to tailor their interventions for people living with neck pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1658-1676"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241268373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors pertaining to neck pain from systematic reviews.

Data sources: A search on PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL was performed on June 27, 2024. Additional grey literature searches were performed.

Review methods: We conducted an umbrella review and included systematic reviews reporting the prognostic factors associated with non-specific or trauma-related neck pain and cervical radiculopathy. Prognostic factors were sorted according to the outcome predicted, the direction of the predicted outcome (worse, better, inconsistent), and the grade of evidence (Oxford Center of Evidence). The predicted outcomes were regrouped into five categories: pain, disability, work-related outcomes, quality of life, and poor outcomes (as "recovery"). Risk of bias analysis was performed with the ROBIS tool.

Results: We retrieved 884 citations from three databases, read 39 full texts, and included 16 studies that met all selection criteria. From these studies, we extracted 44 prognostic factors restricted to non-specific neck pain, 47 for trauma-related neck pain, and one for cervical radiculopathy. We observed that among the prognostic factors, most were associated with characteristics of the condition, cognitive-emotional factors, or socio-environmental and lifestyle factors.

Conclusion: This study identified over 40 prognostic factors associated mainly with non-specific neck pain or trauma-related neck pain. We found that a majority were associated with worse outcomes and pertained to domains mainly involving cognitive-emotional factors, socio-environmental and lifestyle factors, and the characteristics of the condition to predict outcomes and potentially guide clinicians to tailor their interventions for people living with neck pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈部疼痛患者的疼痛、残疾和不良预后因素 - 综述。
研究目的本研究旨在从系统综述中找出与颈部疼痛有关的预后因素:数据来源:2024 年 6 月 27 日在 PubMed、Scopus 和 CINAHL 上进行了检索。还进行了其他灰色文献检索:我们进行了总括性综述,纳入了报道与非特异性或创伤相关颈痛和颈椎病相关的预后因素的系统性综述。根据预测结果、预测结果的方向(更差、更好、不一致)和证据等级(牛津证据中心)对预后因素进行分类。预测结果被重新分为五类:疼痛、残疾、工作相关结果、生活质量和不良结果(作为 "康复")。使用 ROBIS 工具进行了偏倚风险分析:我们从三个数据库中检索到 884 篇引文,阅读了 39 篇全文,并纳入了符合所有选择标准的 16 项研究。我们从这些研究中提取了 44 个预后因素,这些因素仅限于非特异性颈痛,47 个用于创伤相关性颈痛,1 个用于颈椎病。我们发现,在这些预后因素中,大多数与病情特征、认知情感因素或社会环境和生活方式因素有关:本研究发现了 40 多个主要与非特异性颈痛或创伤相关颈痛有关的预后因素。我们发现,大多数因素与较差的预后有关,主要涉及认知情感因素、社会环境和生活方式因素以及病情特征等领域,这些因素可预测预后,并有可能指导临床医生为颈痛患者量身定制干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1