The Impact of Different Optical Zone Diameter on Corneal Astigmatism Correction Using Femtosecond Laser Corneal Relaxing Incisions: 8 mm vs 9 mm.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Current Eye Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1080/02713683.2024.2408395
Zhangliang Li, Yiyi Wang, Ziqi Meng, Yalan Wang, Xicong Lou, Zehui Zhu, Jing Jin, Yun-E Zhao
{"title":"The Impact of Different Optical Zone Diameter on Corneal Astigmatism Correction Using Femtosecond Laser Corneal Relaxing Incisions: 8 mm vs 9 mm.","authors":"Zhangliang Li, Yiyi Wang, Ziqi Meng, Yalan Wang, Xicong Lou, Zehui Zhu, Jing Jin, Yun-E Zhao","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2024.2408395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the impact of 8 mm versus 9 mm optical zone (OZ) diameters on corneal astigmatism correction and to evaluate the impact of incision depth percentage after femtosecond laser corneal relaxing incisions (CRIs) combined with cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine eyes from 39 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups based on the OZ diameter: 8 mm and 9 mm. Corneal astigmatism and CRI depth were measured using Pentacam and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Vector analysis was performed using Alpins method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 8 mm group, postoperative corneal astigmatism was reduced by 0.77 ± 0.61 diopters (D), significantly greater than the reduction of 0.42 ± 0.40 D in the 9 mm group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The 8 mm group exhibited greater surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), net corneal changes, and a smaller angle of error (AE) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 3 months postsurgery, the correction index (CI) values were 0.84 ± 0.39 for the 8 mm group, exceeding the 0.52 ± 0.32 observed in the 9 mm group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean incision depth percentage was significantly higher in the 9 mm group (79.30 ± 10.76%) compared to the 8 mm group (72.58 ± 8.73%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the 8 mm group, CI values closer to 1.00 were associated with lower percentages of incision depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRIs with an 8 mm OZ diameter demonstrated superior efficacy in correcting corneal astigmatism with shallower incision depths compared to those with a 9 mm diameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":" ","pages":"162-168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2024.2408395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the impact of 8 mm versus 9 mm optical zone (OZ) diameters on corneal astigmatism correction and to evaluate the impact of incision depth percentage after femtosecond laser corneal relaxing incisions (CRIs) combined with cataract surgery.

Methods: Thirty-nine eyes from 39 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups based on the OZ diameter: 8 mm and 9 mm. Corneal astigmatism and CRI depth were measured using Pentacam and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Vector analysis was performed using Alpins method.

Results: In the 8 mm group, postoperative corneal astigmatism was reduced by 0.77 ± 0.61 diopters (D), significantly greater than the reduction of 0.42 ± 0.40 D in the 9 mm group (p < 0.05). The 8 mm group exhibited greater surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), net corneal changes, and a smaller angle of error (AE) (p < 0.05). At 3 months postsurgery, the correction index (CI) values were 0.84 ± 0.39 for the 8 mm group, exceeding the 0.52 ± 0.32 observed in the 9 mm group (p < 0.05). The mean incision depth percentage was significantly higher in the 9 mm group (79.30 ± 10.76%) compared to the 8 mm group (72.58 ± 8.73%) (p < 0.05). In the 8 mm group, CI values closer to 1.00 were associated with lower percentages of incision depth.

Conclusions: CRIs with an 8 mm OZ diameter demonstrated superior efficacy in correcting corneal astigmatism with shallower incision depths compared to those with a 9 mm diameter.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同光学区直径对使用飞秒激光角膜松弛切口矫正角膜散光的影响:8毫米与9毫米
目的:比较 8 毫米和 9 毫米光学区(OZ)直径对角膜散光矫正的影响,并评估飞秒激光角膜松弛切口(CRI)联合白内障手术后切口深度百分比的影响:39名患者的39只眼睛被纳入研究,并根据OZ直径随机分为两组:8毫米组和9毫米组。使用 Pentacam 和前段光学相干断层扫描测量角膜散光和 CRI 深度。结果:结果:8 毫米组的术后角膜散光减少了 0.77 ± 0.61 个屈光度(D),明显高于 9 毫米组减少的 0.42 ± 0.40 个屈光度(p p p p 结论):与直径为 9 mm 的 CRI 相比,直径为 8 mm OZ 的 CRI 在矫正角膜散光方面效果更佳,切口深度更浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Eye Research
Current Eye Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Correlation Between Refractive Asymmetry and Eye Dominance According to the Sensory and Fixation Method. Isolated Infantile Onset High Myopia: A Case Series with Long-Term Follow-Up. Intraocular Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection Following Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomised Trial. Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis of a TF-miRNA-mRNA Regulatory Network in Retinal Vein Occlusion with Metabolic Syndrome and its Association with Clinical Predictors. Virtual Reality Visual Field Testing Reduces Visit Duration in a Neuro-Ophthalmology Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1