Letter to editor regarding the article ‘Prediction of heart failure events based on physiologic sensor data’

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS ESC Heart Failure Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15106
Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit
{"title":"Letter to editor regarding the article ‘Prediction of heart failure events based on physiologic sensor data’","authors":"Hinpetch Daungsupawong,&nbsp;Viroj Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We would like to comment on ‘Associations between COVID-19 therapies and outcomes in rural and urban America: A multisite, temporal analysis from the Alpha to Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants’.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The HeartLogic algorithm's sensitivity in foretelling patients with implanted cardiac devices' worsening heart failure episodes (HFEs) was assessed in this study. A cohort of 144 individuals, followed for a total of 244 years, was included in the research; 73 HFEs were noted throughout that time. With an alarm rate of 1.27 alerts per patient-year, it was discovered that the HeartLogic alerts had an 80.8% sensitivity in identifying HFEs. Additionally, the study showed that when patients were in an awake state as opposed to when they were not, the HFE rate was much greater, suggesting that the algorithm may be more effective in monitoring patients during their working hours, potentially allowing for timely interventions and improved management of heart failure episodes.</p><p>The retroactive simulation of HeartLogic alerts using sensor data, which could include bias or inconsistencies in the results, is one potential drawback in the study. Furthermore, the study omitted details regarding the particular causes or symptoms of the HFEs, which would have shed light on the algorithm's capacity for prediction. Furthermore, the study did not address how other factors, which could affect the algorithm's sensitivity and false positive rates, including co-morbidities or medication modifications, might affect how accurate the alerts are.</p><p>Given that the study included patients with both types of implanted devices—ICD and CRT-D—one question that one may pose to the authors is whether the HeartLogic algorithm was equally effective in predicting HFEs in these individuals. Future studies may examine the advantages of modifying the HeartLogic algorithm's alert threshold in order to maximize its sensitivity and specificity across a range of patient demographics. More research might look into the long-term effects and financial viability of using the HeartLogic algorithm in clinical settings to lower hospital stays and enhance patient outcomes for heart failure treatment.</p><p>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":"12 1","pages":"704"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11769643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.15106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We would like to comment on ‘Associations between COVID-19 therapies and outcomes in rural and urban America: A multisite, temporal analysis from the Alpha to Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants’.1 The HeartLogic algorithm's sensitivity in foretelling patients with implanted cardiac devices' worsening heart failure episodes (HFEs) was assessed in this study. A cohort of 144 individuals, followed for a total of 244 years, was included in the research; 73 HFEs were noted throughout that time. With an alarm rate of 1.27 alerts per patient-year, it was discovered that the HeartLogic alerts had an 80.8% sensitivity in identifying HFEs. Additionally, the study showed that when patients were in an awake state as opposed to when they were not, the HFE rate was much greater, suggesting that the algorithm may be more effective in monitoring patients during their working hours, potentially allowing for timely interventions and improved management of heart failure episodes.

The retroactive simulation of HeartLogic alerts using sensor data, which could include bias or inconsistencies in the results, is one potential drawback in the study. Furthermore, the study omitted details regarding the particular causes or symptoms of the HFEs, which would have shed light on the algorithm's capacity for prediction. Furthermore, the study did not address how other factors, which could affect the algorithm's sensitivity and false positive rates, including co-morbidities or medication modifications, might affect how accurate the alerts are.

Given that the study included patients with both types of implanted devices—ICD and CRT-D—one question that one may pose to the authors is whether the HeartLogic algorithm was equally effective in predicting HFEs in these individuals. Future studies may examine the advantages of modifying the HeartLogic algorithm's alert threshold in order to maximize its sensitivity and specificity across a range of patient demographics. More research might look into the long-term effects and financial viability of using the HeartLogic algorithm in clinical settings to lower hospital stays and enhance patient outcomes for heart failure treatment.

None.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致编辑的信,内容涉及 "基于生理传感器数据预测心力衰竭事件 "一文。
我们想对“美国农村和城市COVID-19治疗与结果之间的关联:从Alpha到Omicron SARS-CoV-2变体的多地点、时间分析”发表评论本研究评估了HeartLogic算法预测植入心脏装置患者心力衰竭发作恶化的敏感性。研究人员对144人进行了长达244年的跟踪调查;在此期间共记录到73例hfe。每患者年报警率为1.27次,发现HeartLogic警报识别hfe的灵敏度为80.8%。此外,该研究表明,当患者处于清醒状态时,HFE率要比处于非清醒状态时高得多,这表明该算法可能更有效地监测患者在工作时间的情况,从而有可能及时干预并改善心力衰竭发作的管理。使用传感器数据对HeartLogic警报进行追溯模拟,结果可能存在偏差或不一致,这是该研究的一个潜在缺陷。此外,该研究省略了有关hfe的特定原因或症状的细节,这将揭示该算法的预测能力。此外,该研究没有解决其他可能影响算法敏感性和假阳性率的因素,包括合并症或药物修改,这些因素可能会影响警报的准确性。考虑到这项研究包括了两种类型的植入设备——icd和crt - d——的患者,人们可能会向作者提出一个问题,即HeartLogic算法在预测这些个体的hfe方面是否同样有效。未来的研究可能会检查修改HeartLogic算法的警报阈值的优势,以便最大限度地提高其在一系列患者人口统计学中的敏感性和特异性。更多的研究可能会关注在临床环境中使用HeartLogic算法的长期效果和经济可行性,以降低住院时间并提高心力衰竭治疗的患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Addressing the Gaps in Heart Failure Treatment for Frail Older Adults: Challenges, Evidence, and Future Directions. Real-world evidence with dapagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Central Eastern Europe and the Baltic region (EVOLUTION-HF CEE-BA Study). Long-term outcomes following Sacubitril/Valsartan therapy for chronic HFrEF. Italian Real-World Multicenter Study. Cardiac Biomarkers Response Under Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor: A Sub-Analysis of the Natrium-HF Study. cDPP3 and Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure: An Analysis of the STRONG-HF and CORTAHF Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1