Patient factors associated with embolization or splenectomy within 30 days of initiating surveillance for splenic trauma.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Emergency Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1007/s10140-024-02285-3
Fatah Tidadini, Eugenie Martinet, Jean-Louis Quesada, Alison Foote, Chayma El Wafir, Edouard Girard, Catherine Arvieux
{"title":"Patient factors associated with embolization or splenectomy within 30 days of initiating surveillance for splenic trauma.","authors":"Fatah Tidadini, Eugenie Martinet, Jean-Louis Quesada, Alison Foote, Chayma El Wafir, Edouard Girard, Catherine Arvieux","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02285-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-operative management of hemodynamically stable patients with splenic trauma has been recommended for more than 25 years, but in practice embolization and/or splenectomy (intervention) is often needed within the first 30 days. Identifying the risk factors associated with the need for intervention could support more individualized decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the SPLASH randomized clinical trial, a comparison of outcomes of surveillance or embolization. 140 patients were randomized, 133 retained in the study (embolization n = 66; surveillance n = 67) and 103 screened and registered in the non-inclusion register. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates were used to identify risk factors contributing to embolization and/or splenectomy within 30 days after initiating surveillance only for splenic trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>123 patients (median age, 30 [23; 48] years; 91 (74%) male) initially received non-operative management. At the day-30 visit, 34 (27.6%) patients had undergone an intervention (31 (25.2%) delayed embolization and 4 (3.3%) splenectomy). Multivariate analysis identified patients with OIS grade 4 or 5 splenic trauma (HR = 4.51 [2.06-9.88]) and (HR = 34.5 [6.84-174]); respectively) and splenic complications: arterial leak (HR = 1.80 [1.45-2.24]), pseudoaneurysm (HR = 1.22 [1.06-1.40]) and pseudocyst (HR = 1.41 [1.21-1.64]) to be independently associated with increased risk of need for an intervention within 30 days of initiating surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows that more than 1 in 4 patients who received non-operative management needed embolization or splenectomy by day 30. Arterial leak, pseudoaneurysm, pseudocyst, and OIS grade 4 or 5 were independent risk factors linked to the need for an intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02021396.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-024-02285-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-operative management of hemodynamically stable patients with splenic trauma has been recommended for more than 25 years, but in practice embolization and/or splenectomy (intervention) is often needed within the first 30 days. Identifying the risk factors associated with the need for intervention could support more individualized decision-making.

Methods: We used data from the SPLASH randomized clinical trial, a comparison of outcomes of surveillance or embolization. 140 patients were randomized, 133 retained in the study (embolization n = 66; surveillance n = 67) and 103 screened and registered in the non-inclusion register. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates were used to identify risk factors contributing to embolization and/or splenectomy within 30 days after initiating surveillance only for splenic trauma.

Results: 123 patients (median age, 30 [23; 48] years; 91 (74%) male) initially received non-operative management. At the day-30 visit, 34 (27.6%) patients had undergone an intervention (31 (25.2%) delayed embolization and 4 (3.3%) splenectomy). Multivariate analysis identified patients with OIS grade 4 or 5 splenic trauma (HR = 4.51 [2.06-9.88]) and (HR = 34.5 [6.84-174]); respectively) and splenic complications: arterial leak (HR = 1.80 [1.45-2.24]), pseudoaneurysm (HR = 1.22 [1.06-1.40]) and pseudocyst (HR = 1.41 [1.21-1.64]) to be independently associated with increased risk of need for an intervention within 30 days of initiating surveillance.

Conclusions: Our study shows that more than 1 in 4 patients who received non-operative management needed embolization or splenectomy by day 30. Arterial leak, pseudoaneurysm, pseudocyst, and OIS grade 4 or 5 were independent risk factors linked to the need for an intervention.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02021396.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在开始监测脾外伤后 30 天内进行栓塞或脾切除术的相关患者因素。
背景:对血流动力学稳定的脾脏外伤患者进行非手术治疗已被推荐超过 25 年,但实际上在最初的 30 天内往往需要进行栓塞和/或脾脏切除术(介入治疗)。确定与需要介入治疗相关的风险因素有助于做出更个性化的决策:我们使用了 SPLASH 随机临床试验的数据,该试验对监测或栓塞治疗的结果进行了比较。140名患者被随机选中,其中133名保留在研究中(栓塞n=66;监测n=67),103名被筛查并登记在非纳入登记册中。采用多变量 Cox 比例危险模型和随时间变化的协变量来确定导致仅对脾外伤进行监测后 30 天内进行栓塞和/或脾切除术的风险因素:123名患者(中位年龄为30 [23; 48]岁;91人(74%)为男性)最初接受了非手术治疗。在第 30 天就诊时,有 34 名(27.6%)患者接受了介入治疗(31 名(25.2%)患者接受了延迟栓塞治疗,4 名(3.3%)患者接受了脾切除术)。多变量分析确定了 OIS 4 级或 5 级脾创伤(HR = 4.51 [2.06-9.88]) 和(HR = 34.5 [6.84-174])患者以及脾并发症:动脉漏(HR = 1.80 [1.45-2.24])、假性动脉瘤(HR = 1.22 [1.06-1.40])和假性囊肿(HR = 1.41 [1.21-1.64])与开始监测后30天内需要干预的风险增加独立相关:我们的研究表明,在接受非手术治疗的患者中,每 4 人中就有 1 人以上在第 30 天前需要进行栓塞或脾切除术。动脉漏、假性动脉瘤、假性囊肿和 OIS 4 级或 5 级是导致需要干预的独立风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Radiology
Emergency Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Exploring the role of CT scouts in expediting MRI in acute stroke. Splenic artery embolization for variceal bleeding in portal hypertension: a systematic review and metanalysis. Radiology resident proficiency in pediatric trauma cases: a comparative analysis based on trauma center status using the WIDI SIM exam. Correction to: Emergency imaging protocols for pregnant patients: a multiinstitutional and multi- specialty comparison of physician education. Reliability of distal radius fracture classification systems: a CT based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1