Chemsex and its impact on gay and bisexual men who have sex with men: Findings from an online survey in Belgium.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES HIV Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1111/hiv.13717
Tom Platteau, C Herrijgers, V Barvaux, W Vanden Berghe, L Apers, T Vanbaelen
{"title":"Chemsex and its impact on gay and bisexual men who have sex with men: Findings from an online survey in Belgium.","authors":"Tom Platteau, C Herrijgers, V Barvaux, W Vanden Berghe, L Apers, T Vanbaelen","doi":"10.1111/hiv.13717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of sexualized drug use, or chemsex, in a wide group of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) in Belgium. It examined which drugs gbMSM used before and during sex, the frequency with which they used it, whether they experienced non-consensual sex, and evaluated the impact of chemsex on the health and professional and social lives of respondents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online survey among Belgian gbMSM. Five specific questions on chemsex were included in the survey. These questions assessed whether gbMSM engaged in chemsex. If they did, they were asked to provide information on which drugs they had used and how often. We asked whether their and their partners' boundaries had been respected and whether and how engaging in chemsex had affected a range of life domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 836 respondents, 258 (30.9%) self-reported having had sex under the influence of substances (\"chemsex\") in the previous 6 months. Of these, 227 (88%) were considered chemsex users according to the definition used for the analysis. Poppers (73%), gamma-hydroxybutyrate/gamma-butyrolactone (GHB/GBL; 69%) and cathinones (68%) were the most commonly reported substances. Almost half of respondents (45%) engaging in chemsex were high on drugs during at least half of their sexual encounters. Nearly 1 in 10 (9%) reported that boundaries had not been respected, suggesting non-consensual sexual activities. The 82 respondents experiencing negative impacts from their chemsex use reported that mental health (65%), physical health (40%) and sexual health (38%) were most impacted.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings provide a snapshot of the current chemsex situation in Belgium. The frequency of chemsex is concerning because several health, professional and social aspects are impacted. Almost 1 in 10 respondents using chemsex reported that chemsex impacted consent around sex, requiring additional efforts to eradicate these non-consensual sexual experiences. Therefore, larger scale research focusing on respected boundaries and consent during chemsex and the frequency of drug use for sex seems required. Additionally, sensitisation, as well as care and support programmes are critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":13176,"journal":{"name":"HIV Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of sexualized drug use, or chemsex, in a wide group of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) in Belgium. It examined which drugs gbMSM used before and during sex, the frequency with which they used it, whether they experienced non-consensual sex, and evaluated the impact of chemsex on the health and professional and social lives of respondents.

Methods: We conducted an online survey among Belgian gbMSM. Five specific questions on chemsex were included in the survey. These questions assessed whether gbMSM engaged in chemsex. If they did, they were asked to provide information on which drugs they had used and how often. We asked whether their and their partners' boundaries had been respected and whether and how engaging in chemsex had affected a range of life domains.

Results: Of 836 respondents, 258 (30.9%) self-reported having had sex under the influence of substances ("chemsex") in the previous 6 months. Of these, 227 (88%) were considered chemsex users according to the definition used for the analysis. Poppers (73%), gamma-hydroxybutyrate/gamma-butyrolactone (GHB/GBL; 69%) and cathinones (68%) were the most commonly reported substances. Almost half of respondents (45%) engaging in chemsex were high on drugs during at least half of their sexual encounters. Nearly 1 in 10 (9%) reported that boundaries had not been respected, suggesting non-consensual sexual activities. The 82 respondents experiencing negative impacts from their chemsex use reported that mental health (65%), physical health (40%) and sexual health (38%) were most impacted.

Discussion: Our findings provide a snapshot of the current chemsex situation in Belgium. The frequency of chemsex is concerning because several health, professional and social aspects are impacted. Almost 1 in 10 respondents using chemsex reported that chemsex impacted consent around sex, requiring additional efforts to eradicate these non-consensual sexual experiences. Therefore, larger scale research focusing on respected boundaries and consent during chemsex and the frequency of drug use for sex seems required. Additionally, sensitisation, as well as care and support programmes are critical.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化性及其对男同性恋者和双性恋者的影响:比利时在线调查的结果。
研究目的该研究旨在估算比利时广大男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(gbMSM)群体中性化药物使用(或称 "性化")的普遍程度。该研究调查了男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者在性爱前和性爱过程中使用的药物、使用频率、是否经历过未经同意的性行为,并评估了化学性行为对受访者健康、职业和社会生活的影响:我们对比利时的男男性行为者进行了在线调查。方法:我们对比利时的男男性行为者进行了一次在线调查,其中包括五个关于化学性行为的具体问题。这些问题用于评估性别男男性行为者是否参与了性交易。如果有,则要求他们提供使用过哪些药物以及使用频率的信息。我们询问他们及其伴侣的界限是否得到了尊重,以及化学性行为是否以及如何影响了一系列生活领域:在 836 名受访者中,有 258 人(30.9%)自称在过去 6 个月中曾在药物影响下发生过性行为("chemsex")。根据分析所用的定义,其中 227 人(88%)被认为是化学性行为使用者。罂粟碱(73%)、γ-羟丁酸/γ-丁内酯(GHB/GBL;69%)和卡西酮(68%)是最常报告的药物。近一半(45%)参与 "化学性交 "的受访者在至少一半的性接触中嗑药。每 10 名受访者中就有近 1 人(9%)报告说,性界限没有得到尊重,这表明性活动是未经同意的。82名受访者表示,他们的精神健康(65%)、身体健康(40%)和性健康(38%)受到的影响最大:讨论:我们的调查结果显示了比利时目前的性交易情况。性交易的频繁程度令人担忧,因为健康、职业和社会等多个方面都受到了影响。几乎每 10 个使用过化学性交的受访者中就有 1 人表示,化学性交影响了对性行为的同意,这就要求我们做出更多努力来消除这些未经同意的性经历。因此,似乎需要开展更大规模的研究,重点关注药交过程中受尊重的界限和同意,以及为性而使用药物的频率。此外,宣传以及护理和支持计划也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HIV Medicine
HIV Medicine 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: HIV Medicine aims to provide an alternative outlet for publication of international research papers in the field of HIV Medicine, embracing clinical, pharmocological, epidemiological, ethical, preclinical and in vitro studies. In addition, the journal will commission reviews and other feature articles. It will focus on evidence-based medicine as the mainstay of successful management of HIV and AIDS. The journal is specifically aimed at researchers and clinicians with responsibility for treating HIV seropositive patients.
期刊最新文献
High prevalence of osteoporosis among virally suppressed older people (≥60 years) living with HIV. Comparing short-term mortality between people with and without HIV admitted to the intensive care unit: A single-centre matched cohort study (2000-2019). Rising mortality among people who inject drugs living with HIV in Scotland, UK: A 20-year retrospective cohort study. In vitro and patient studies with platelets to explore off-target cardiovascular effects of integrase inhibitors. Clinical staff attitudes towards opt-out consent for blood-borne virus screening in emergency departments in England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1