Timothy M Markman, Lingyu Xu, Sohail Zahid, Darshak Patel, Francis E Marchlinski, David Callans, Saman Nazarian
{"title":"Augmentation of Atrial Conduction Velocity With Pharmacological and Direct Electrical Sympathetic Stimulation.","authors":"Timothy M Markman, Lingyu Xu, Sohail Zahid, Darshak Patel, Francis E Marchlinski, David Callans, Saman Nazarian","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial conduction velocity (CV) is influenced by autonomic tone and contributes to the pathophysiology of re-entrant arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation. Cardiac sympathetic nerve activation has been reported via electrical stimulation within the vertebral vein (VV).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study sought to characterize changes in right atrial (RA) CV associated with sympathetic stimulation from pharmacologic (isoproterenol) or direct electrical (VV stimulation) approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation had baseline RA electroanatomic maps performed in sinus rhythm (SR). RA mapping was repeated during right VV stimulation (20 Hz; up to 20 mA) and again with both RA pacing and during isoproterenol infusion, each titrated to the heart rate achieved with VV stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 RA maps were analyzed from 25 subjects (mean age: 58 ± 14 years; 56% male), and CV was calculated from 51,534 electroanatomic map points. VV stimulation increased heart rate from baseline in all subjects (22.5 ± 5.5 beats/min). The average CV increased with VV stimulation (82.0 ± 34.5 cm/s) or isoproterenol (83.7 ± 35.0 cm/s) when compared to SR (70.8 ± 32.5 cm/s; P < 0.001). Heterogeneity of CV decreased with VV stimulation or isoproterenol when compared to SR (coefficient of variation: 0.33 ± 0.21 vs 0.35 ± 0.23 vs 0.57 ± 0.29; P < 0.001). There was no difference in CV or CV heterogeneity between SR and RA pacing, suggesting that these changes were independent of heart rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Global RA CV is enhanced, and heterogeneity of CV is reduced, with either pharmacologic or direct electrical sympathetic stimulation via the right VV.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.08.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Atrial conduction velocity (CV) is influenced by autonomic tone and contributes to the pathophysiology of re-entrant arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation. Cardiac sympathetic nerve activation has been reported via electrical stimulation within the vertebral vein (VV).
Objectives: This study sought to characterize changes in right atrial (RA) CV associated with sympathetic stimulation from pharmacologic (isoproterenol) or direct electrical (VV stimulation) approaches.
Methods: Subjects undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation had baseline RA electroanatomic maps performed in sinus rhythm (SR). RA mapping was repeated during right VV stimulation (20 Hz; up to 20 mA) and again with both RA pacing and during isoproterenol infusion, each titrated to the heart rate achieved with VV stimulation.
Results: A total of 100 RA maps were analyzed from 25 subjects (mean age: 58 ± 14 years; 56% male), and CV was calculated from 51,534 electroanatomic map points. VV stimulation increased heart rate from baseline in all subjects (22.5 ± 5.5 beats/min). The average CV increased with VV stimulation (82.0 ± 34.5 cm/s) or isoproterenol (83.7 ± 35.0 cm/s) when compared to SR (70.8 ± 32.5 cm/s; P < 0.001). Heterogeneity of CV decreased with VV stimulation or isoproterenol when compared to SR (coefficient of variation: 0.33 ± 0.21 vs 0.35 ± 0.23 vs 0.57 ± 0.29; P < 0.001). There was no difference in CV or CV heterogeneity between SR and RA pacing, suggesting that these changes were independent of heart rate.
Conclusions: Global RA CV is enhanced, and heterogeneity of CV is reduced, with either pharmacologic or direct electrical sympathetic stimulation via the right VV.
期刊介绍：
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
