Comparison of perinatal outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to type of treatment for glycemic control.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Jornal de pediatria Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2024.03.016
Pollyana Carvalho de Souza, Amanda Gabriela Araújo da Silva, Cristina Maria de Araújo Medeiros Santos, Luciana Araújo Cartaxo da Costa Santiago, Maria Elionês de Oliveira Araújo, Isabelle Lorena Barbosa de Lima, Karla Danielly da Silva Ribeiro
{"title":"Comparison of perinatal outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to type of treatment for glycemic control.","authors":"Pollyana Carvalho de Souza, Amanda Gabriela Araújo da Silva, Cristina Maria de Araújo Medeiros Santos, Luciana Araújo Cartaxo da Costa Santiago, Maria Elionês de Oliveira Araújo, Isabelle Lorena Barbosa de Lima, Karla Danielly da Silva Ribeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2024.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the perinatal outcomes of women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), between pregnant treated only with lifestyle changes and pregnant treated with insulin and lifestyle changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study with follow-up of 64 women with GDM during the prenatal care and postpartum period until hospital discharge, divided into a control group (43) and an insulin group (21), with collection of sociodemographic, clinical, glycemic control and perinatal outcome data. Fetal macrosomia (≥ 4 Kg), or large-for-gestational-age newborns were considered the primary outcome of the research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-pregnancy BMI (31.2 ± 3.9 versus 28.8 ± 5.5), diastolic blood pressure (75 ± 8.7 versus 69 ± 6.9) and postprandial blood glucose (136.6 versus 115.4) ​​were higher in the insulin group, respectively. The control group had an average birth weight of 3058 g and an incidence of preterm birth of 11.6 %, while the insulin group had an average birth weight of 3203 g, with an incidence of preterm birth of 4.8 %. The majority of newborns had an adequate weight for their gestational age. Even all participants met glycemic goals, in the insulin group the Apgar score at the 5th minute and exclusive breastfeeding was lower, had 100 % of resuscitation cases, and a longer inpatient period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data reinforce that even during prenatal care with lifestyle changes, newborns of women with GDM treated with insulin had worse outcomes, including clinical complications and less exclusive breastfeeding. It is important in prenatal care to identify neonates with risk for prevention and health promotion measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2024.03.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the perinatal outcomes of women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), between pregnant treated only with lifestyle changes and pregnant treated with insulin and lifestyle changes.

Methods: Prospective cohort study with follow-up of 64 women with GDM during the prenatal care and postpartum period until hospital discharge, divided into a control group (43) and an insulin group (21), with collection of sociodemographic, clinical, glycemic control and perinatal outcome data. Fetal macrosomia (≥ 4 Kg), or large-for-gestational-age newborns were considered the primary outcome of the research.

Results: Pre-pregnancy BMI (31.2 ± 3.9 versus 28.8 ± 5.5), diastolic blood pressure (75 ± 8.7 versus 69 ± 6.9) and postprandial blood glucose (136.6 versus 115.4) ​​were higher in the insulin group, respectively. The control group had an average birth weight of 3058 g and an incidence of preterm birth of 11.6 %, while the insulin group had an average birth weight of 3203 g, with an incidence of preterm birth of 4.8 %. The majority of newborns had an adequate weight for their gestational age. Even all participants met glycemic goals, in the insulin group the Apgar score at the 5th minute and exclusive breastfeeding was lower, had 100 % of resuscitation cases, and a longer inpatient period.

Conclusion: These data reinforce that even during prenatal care with lifestyle changes, newborns of women with GDM treated with insulin had worse outcomes, including clinical complications and less exclusive breastfeeding. It is important in prenatal care to identify neonates with risk for prevention and health promotion measures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据控制血糖的治疗类型比较妊娠糖尿病妇女的围产期结局。
目的比较仅接受生活方式改变治疗的 GDM 孕妇与接受胰岛素和生活方式改变治疗的孕妇的围产期结局:前瞻性队列研究:对 64 名 GDM 孕妇进行产前和产后随访,直至出院,分为对照组(43 人)和胰岛素组(21 人),收集社会人口学、临床、血糖控制和围产期结局数据。胎儿巨大儿(≥ 4 千克)或妊娠期巨大儿是研究的主要结果:结果:胰岛素组的孕前体重指数(31.2 ± 3.9 对 28.8 ± 5.5)、舒张压(75 ± 8.7 对 69 ± 6.9)和餐后血糖(136.6 对 115.4)分别高于对照组。对照组新生儿的平均体重为 3058 克,早产率为 11.6%,而胰岛素组新生儿的平均体重为 3203 克,早产率为 4.8%。大多数新生儿的体重符合其胎龄。即使所有参与者都达到了血糖目标,但胰岛素组新生儿在第 5 分钟的阿普加评分和纯母乳喂养率较低,复苏率为 100%,住院时间较长:这些数据进一步说明,即使在改变生活方式的产前护理期间,使用胰岛素治疗 GDM 妇女的新生儿的预后也较差,包括临床并发症和纯母乳喂养率较低。在产前护理中,识别有风险的新生儿以采取预防和促进健康的措施非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal de pediatria
Jornal de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.
期刊最新文献
Climate change and children's health: resilience challenges for Brazil. Impact of air pollution and climate change on maternal, fetal and postnatal health. Neurodevelopment and climate change. Microplastics: the hidden danger. Spinal muscular atrophy in Brazil: from individual treatment to global management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1