Use of transportability methods for real-world evidence generation: a review of current applications.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of comparative effectiveness research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.57264/cer-2024-0064
Natalie S Levy, Patrick J Arena, Thomas Jemielita, Shahrul Mt-Isa, Shane McElwee, David Lenis, Ulka B Campbell, Ashley Jaksa, Gleicy M Hair
{"title":"Use of transportability methods for real-world evidence generation: a review of current applications.","authors":"Natalie S Levy, Patrick J Arena, Thomas Jemielita, Shahrul Mt-Isa, Shane McElwee, David Lenis, Ulka B Campbell, Ashley Jaksa, Gleicy M Hair","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate how transportability methods are currently used for real-world evidence (RWE) generation to inform good practices and support adoption and acceptance of these methods in the RWE context. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a targeted literature review to identify studies that transported an effect estimate of the clinical effectiveness or safety of a biomedical exposure to a target real-world population. Records were identified from PubMed-indexed articles published any time before 25 July 2023 (inclusive). Two reviewers screened abstracts/titles and reviewed the full text of candidate studies to identify the final set of articles. Data on the therapeutic area, exposure(s), outcome(s), original and target populations and details of the transportability analysis (e.g., analytic method used, estimate transported, stated assumptions) were abstracted from each article. <b>Results:</b> Of 458 unique records identified, six were retained in the final review. Articles were published during 2021-2023, focused on the US/Canada context, and covered a range of therapeutic areas. Four studies transported an RCT effect estimate, while two transported effect estimates derived from real-world data. Almost all articles used weighting methods to transport estimates. Two studies discussed all transportability assumptions, and one evaluated the likelihood of meeting all assumptions and the impact of potential violations. <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of transportability methods for RWE generation is an emerging and promising area of research to address evidence gaps in settings with limited data and infrastructure. More transparent and rigorous reporting of methods, assumptions and limitations may increase the use and acceptability of transportability for producing robust evidence on treatment effectiveness and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate how transportability methods are currently used for real-world evidence (RWE) generation to inform good practices and support adoption and acceptance of these methods in the RWE context. Methods: We conducted a targeted literature review to identify studies that transported an effect estimate of the clinical effectiveness or safety of a biomedical exposure to a target real-world population. Records were identified from PubMed-indexed articles published any time before 25 July 2023 (inclusive). Two reviewers screened abstracts/titles and reviewed the full text of candidate studies to identify the final set of articles. Data on the therapeutic area, exposure(s), outcome(s), original and target populations and details of the transportability analysis (e.g., analytic method used, estimate transported, stated assumptions) were abstracted from each article. Results: Of 458 unique records identified, six were retained in the final review. Articles were published during 2021-2023, focused on the US/Canada context, and covered a range of therapeutic areas. Four studies transported an RCT effect estimate, while two transported effect estimates derived from real-world data. Almost all articles used weighting methods to transport estimates. Two studies discussed all transportability assumptions, and one evaluated the likelihood of meeting all assumptions and the impact of potential violations. Conclusion: The use of transportability methods for RWE generation is an emerging and promising area of research to address evidence gaps in settings with limited data and infrastructure. More transparent and rigorous reporting of methods, assumptions and limitations may increase the use and acceptability of transportability for producing robust evidence on treatment effectiveness and safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用可传输性方法生成真实世界的证据:当前应用综述。
目的:评估目前如何将可转移性方法用于真实世界证据(RWE)的生成,以便为良好实践提供信息,并支持在真实世界证据背景下采用和接受这些方法。方法我们进行了一次有针对性的文献综述,以确定对目标真实世界人群的生物医学暴露的临床有效性或安全性进行效果评估的研究。从 2023 年 7 月 25 日(含)之前发表的任何时间的 PubMed 索引文章中识别记录。两名审稿人筛选了候选研究的摘要/标题并审阅了全文,最终确定了一组文章。从每篇文章中摘录有关治疗领域、暴露、结果、原始人群和目标人群的数据,以及可迁移性分析的详细信息(如使用的分析方法、迁移的估计值、陈述的假设)。结果:在确定的 458 条唯一记录中,有 6 条保留在最终审查中。这些文章发表于 2021-2023 年间,主要集中在美国/加拿大,涵盖了一系列治疗领域。四项研究采用了 RCT 效果估算,两项研究采用了来自真实世界数据的效果估算。几乎所有文章都使用了加权方法来迁移估计值。两项研究讨论了所有可迁移性假设,一项研究评估了满足所有假设的可能性以及潜在违反假设的影响。结论使用可迁移性方法生成 RWE 是一个新兴且前景广阔的研究领域,可在数据和基础设施有限的情况下解决证据差距问题。对方法、假设和局限性进行更透明、更严格的报告,可提高可迁移性的使用率和可接受性,从而为治疗的有效性和安全性提供可靠的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Dependent censoring bias assessment using inverse probability of censoring weights: Type 2 diabetes mellitus risk in patients initiating bisoprolol versus other antihypertensives in a Clinical Practice Research Datalink cohort study. Access in all areas? A round up of developments in market access and HTA: part 5. Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with volume computed tomography in Portugal. Use of transportability methods for real-world evidence generation: a review of current applications. Ravulizumab for adults with generalized myasthenia gravis: a plain language summary of three studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1