X- vs. Y-chromosome influences on human behavior: a deep phenotypic comparison of psychopathology in XXY and XYY syndromes.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1186/s11689-024-09574-5
Lukas Schaffer, Srishti Rau, Isabella G Larsen, Liv Clasen, Allysa Warling, Ethan T Whitman, Ajay Nadig, Cassidy McDermott, Anastasia Xenophontos, Kathleen Wilson, Jonathan Blumenthal, Erin Torres, Armin Raznahan
{"title":"X- vs. Y-chromosome influences on human behavior: a deep phenotypic comparison of psychopathology in XXY and XYY syndromes.","authors":"Lukas Schaffer, Srishti Rau, Isabella G Larsen, Liv Clasen, Allysa Warling, Ethan T Whitman, Ajay Nadig, Cassidy McDermott, Anastasia Xenophontos, Kathleen Wilson, Jonathan Blumenthal, Erin Torres, Armin Raznahan","doi":"10.1186/s11689-024-09574-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Do different genetic disorders impart different psychiatric risk profiles? This question has major implications for biological and translational aspects of psychiatry, but has been difficult to tackle given limited access to shared batteries of fine-grained clinical data across genetic disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a new suite of generalizable analytic approaches, we examine gold-standard diagnostic ratings, scores on 66 dimensional measures of psychopathology, and measures of cognition and functioning in two different sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs)-Klinefelter (XXY/KS) and XYY syndrome (n = 102 and 64 vs. n = 74 and 60 matched XY controls, total n = 300). We focus on SCAs for their high collective prevalence, informativeness regarding differential X- vs. Y-chromosome effects, and potential relevance for normative sex differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show that XXY/KS elevates rates for most psychiatric diagnoses as previously reported for XYY, but disproportionately so for anxiety disorders. Fine-mapping across all 66 traits provides a detailed profile of psychopathology in XXY/KS which is strongly correlated with that of XYY (r = .75 across traits) and robust to ascertainment biases, but reveals: (i) a greater penetrance of XYY than KS/XXY for most traits except mood/anxiety problems, and (ii) a disproportionate impact of XYY vs. XXY/KS on social problems. XXY/KS and XYY showed a similar coupling of psychopathology with adaptive function and caregiver strain, but not IQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work provides new tools for deep-phenotypic comparisons of genetic disorders in psychiatry and uses these to detail unique and shared effects of the X- and Y-chromosome on human behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":16530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":"16 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-024-09574-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Do different genetic disorders impart different psychiatric risk profiles? This question has major implications for biological and translational aspects of psychiatry, but has been difficult to tackle given limited access to shared batteries of fine-grained clinical data across genetic disorders.

Methods: Using a new suite of generalizable analytic approaches, we examine gold-standard diagnostic ratings, scores on 66 dimensional measures of psychopathology, and measures of cognition and functioning in two different sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs)-Klinefelter (XXY/KS) and XYY syndrome (n = 102 and 64 vs. n = 74 and 60 matched XY controls, total n = 300). We focus on SCAs for their high collective prevalence, informativeness regarding differential X- vs. Y-chromosome effects, and potential relevance for normative sex differences.

Results: We show that XXY/KS elevates rates for most psychiatric diagnoses as previously reported for XYY, but disproportionately so for anxiety disorders. Fine-mapping across all 66 traits provides a detailed profile of psychopathology in XXY/KS which is strongly correlated with that of XYY (r = .75 across traits) and robust to ascertainment biases, but reveals: (i) a greater penetrance of XYY than KS/XXY for most traits except mood/anxiety problems, and (ii) a disproportionate impact of XYY vs. XXY/KS on social problems. XXY/KS and XYY showed a similar coupling of psychopathology with adaptive function and caregiver strain, but not IQ.

Conclusions: This work provides new tools for deep-phenotypic comparisons of genetic disorders in psychiatry and uses these to detail unique and shared effects of the X- and Y-chromosome on human behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
X 染色体与 Y 染色体对人类行为的影响:XXY 和 XYY 综合征精神病理学的深度表型比较。
背景:不同的遗传疾病是否会带来不同的精神疾病风险特征?这个问题对精神病学的生物学和转化方面具有重大影响,但由于难以获得不同遗传疾病的共享精细临床数据,因此很难解决这个问题:我们使用一套新的通用分析方法,对两种不同的性染色体非整倍体(SCA)--Klinefelter (XXY/KS) 和 XYY 综合征(n = 102 和 64 vs. n = 74 和 60 匹配的 XY 对照组,共 n = 300)--的金标准诊断评级、66 个精神病理学维度测量的得分以及认知和功能测量进行了研究。我们重点研究了SCA,因为它们的集体发病率高,在X染色体与Y染色体效应差异方面信息量大,而且可能与正常性别差异有关:结果:我们发现,XXY/KS 会提高大多数精神疾病的诊断率,这与之前报道的 XYY 的诊断率相同,但焦虑症的诊断率则不成比例地升高。对所有 66 个性状的精细映射提供了详细的 XXY/KS 精神病理学特征,它与 XYY 的精神病理学特征具有很强的相关性(各性状间的 r = 0.75),并且不受确定偏差的影响,但显示:(i) 除情绪/焦虑问题外,在大多数性状上 XYY 比 KS/XXY 具有更高的渗透性;(ii) XYY 与 XXY/KS 对社会问题的影响不成比例。XXY/KS 和 XYY 显示出类似的心理病理学与适应功能和照顾者压力的耦合,但与智商无关:这项研究为精神病学中遗传疾病的深度表型比较提供了新的工具,并利用这些工具详细说明了 X 染色体和 Y 染色体对人类行为的独特和共同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders is an open access journal that integrates current, cutting-edge research across a number of disciplines, including neurobiology, genetics, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology. The journal’s primary focus is on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders including autism, fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, Turner Syndrome, 22q Deletion Syndrome, Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndrome, Williams syndrome, lysosomal storage diseases, dyslexia, specific language impairment and fetal alcohol syndrome. With the discovery of specific genes underlying neurodevelopmental syndromes, the emergence of powerful tools for studying neural circuitry, and the development of new approaches for exploring molecular mechanisms, interdisciplinary research on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders is now increasingly common. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders provides a unique venue for researchers interested in comparing and contrasting mechanisms and characteristics related to the pathogenesis of the full range of neurodevelopmental disorders, sharpening our understanding of the etiology and relevant phenotypes of each condition.
期刊最新文献
Investigating social orienting in children with Phelan-McDermid syndrome and 'idiopathic' autism. Predicting neurodevelopmental disorders using machine learning models and electronic health records - status of the field. The utility of wearable electroencephalography combined with behavioral measures to establish a practical multi-domain model for facilitating the diagnosis of young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Early onset and increasing disparities in neurodevelopmental delays from birth to age 6 in children from low socioeconomic backgrounds. The effect of anxiety and autism symptom severity on restricted and repetitive behaviors over time in children with fragile X syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1