SGLT-2 Inhibitors Versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Effects on Kidney and Clinical Outcomes in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney360 Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000597
Candis M Morello, Linda Awdishu, Stepfanie Lam, Amy Heman, Mark Bounthavong
{"title":"SGLT-2 Inhibitors Versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Effects on Kidney and Clinical Outcomes in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Candis M Morello, Linda Awdishu, Stepfanie Lam, Amy Heman, Mark Bounthavong","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary aim compared kidney endpoints between patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) 36 months after initiation on a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) or a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). Secondary aims compared estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), weight, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of propensity score matched veterans with T2D, baseline eGFR>20mL/min/1.73m2, and initiated on a SGLT2i vs GLP-1RA between 4/1/2009-9/1/2020. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to evaluate effectiveness between both groups on composite endpoint (decline of >=40% in eGFR from baseline, ESRD event, and all-cause mortality) and its components adjusting for baseline characteristics. Spline models were constructed to evaluate eGFR change and linear mixed effects models were constructed to evaluate changes in HbA1c, weight, and UACR. We used an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach as our main analysis followed by a per-protocol (PP) approach excluding veterans who discontinued or switched therapy during the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,146 propensity score matched veterans were included in SGLT2i and GLP-1RA groups (14,573 per group). In the ITT and PP analyses, veterans initiated on SGLT2i had a 35% (HR=0.65; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.68) and 34% (HR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.69) reduction in the hazard of experiencing the composite endpoint compared to veterans initiated on GLP-1RA adjusting for baseline characteristics, respectively. Between 6-36 months, we found an improved chronic eGFR slope with SGLT2i compared to GLP-1RA in both ITT and PP analyses; +1.19 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.45) and +1.29 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.57), respectively. The annual difference in chronic eGFR slope in both ITT and PP analyses were +0.97 mL/min/1.73m2/year (95% CI: 0.82, 1.11) and +1.08 mL/min/1.73m2/year (95% CI: 0.92, 1.25). Improved HbA1c, weight loss and UACR were reported for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world study, veterans with T2D initiated on SGLT2i were associated with reduced hazard of experiencing mortality, worsening eGFR, or developing ESRD and improved glycemic, metabolic, and renal endpoints compared to GLP-1RA use.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary aim compared kidney endpoints between patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) 36 months after initiation on a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) or a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). Secondary aims compared estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), weight, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) changes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of propensity score matched veterans with T2D, baseline eGFR>20mL/min/1.73m2, and initiated on a SGLT2i vs GLP-1RA between 4/1/2009-9/1/2020. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to evaluate effectiveness between both groups on composite endpoint (decline of >=40% in eGFR from baseline, ESRD event, and all-cause mortality) and its components adjusting for baseline characteristics. Spline models were constructed to evaluate eGFR change and linear mixed effects models were constructed to evaluate changes in HbA1c, weight, and UACR. We used an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach as our main analysis followed by a per-protocol (PP) approach excluding veterans who discontinued or switched therapy during the study period.

Results: A total of 29,146 propensity score matched veterans were included in SGLT2i and GLP-1RA groups (14,573 per group). In the ITT and PP analyses, veterans initiated on SGLT2i had a 35% (HR=0.65; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.68) and 34% (HR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.69) reduction in the hazard of experiencing the composite endpoint compared to veterans initiated on GLP-1RA adjusting for baseline characteristics, respectively. Between 6-36 months, we found an improved chronic eGFR slope with SGLT2i compared to GLP-1RA in both ITT and PP analyses; +1.19 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.45) and +1.29 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.57), respectively. The annual difference in chronic eGFR slope in both ITT and PP analyses were +0.97 mL/min/1.73m2/year (95% CI: 0.82, 1.11) and +1.08 mL/min/1.73m2/year (95% CI: 0.92, 1.25). Improved HbA1c, weight loss and UACR were reported for both groups.

Conclusion: In this real-world study, veterans with T2D initiated on SGLT2i were associated with reduced hazard of experiencing mortality, worsening eGFR, or developing ESRD and improved glycemic, metabolic, and renal endpoints compared to GLP-1RA use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SGLT-2 抑制剂与 GLP-1 受体激动剂对 2 型糖尿病退伍军人肾脏和临床结果的影响。
研究背景主要目的是比较2型糖尿病(T2D)患者在开始服用钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)或GLP-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)36个月后的肾脏终点。次要目的是比较估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)、体重和尿白蛋白-肌酐比值(UACR)的变化:我们对患有 T2D、基线 eGFR>20mL/min/1.73m2 且在 2009 年 1 月 4 日至 2020 年 1 月 9 日期间开始服用 SGLT2i 与 GLP-1RA 的倾向得分匹配退伍军人进行了一项回顾性队列研究。建立了 Cox 比例危险模型,以评估两组患者对复合终点(eGFR 从基线下降 >=40%、ESRD 事件和全因死亡率)及其组成部分的有效性,并对基线特征进行调整。我们构建了样条模型来评估 eGFR 的变化,并构建了线性混合效应模型来评估 HbA1c、体重和 UACR 的变化。我们采用意向治疗(ITT)方法进行主要分析,然后采用每方案(PP)方法排除在研究期间中断或转换疗法的退伍军人:SGLT2i组和GLP-1RA组共纳入了29146名倾向得分匹配的退伍军人(每组14573人)。在 ITT 和 PP 分析中,与开始使用 GLP-1RA 的退伍军人相比,在调整基线特征后,开始使用 SGLT2i 的退伍军人出现复合终点的危险分别降低了 35% (HR=0.65; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.68) 和 34% (HR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.69)。在 ITT 和 PP 分析中,我们发现与 GLP-1RA 相比,SGLT2i 在 6-36 个月期间改善了慢性 eGFR 坡度;分别为 +1.19 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.45) 和 +1.29 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.57)。在 ITT 和 PP 分析中,慢性 eGFR 坡度的年度差异分别为 +0.97 mL/min/1.73m2/year (95% CI: 0.82, 1.11) 和 +1.08 mL/min/1.73m2/year (95% CI: 0.92, 1.25)。两组患者的 HbA1c、体重减轻和 UACR 均有改善:在这项真实世界研究中,与使用 GLP-1RA 相比,患有 T2D 的退伍军人开始使用 SGLT2i 可降低死亡、eGFR 恶化或发生 ESRD 的风险,并改善血糖、代谢和肾脏终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
nPOD-Kidney: A Heterogenous Donor Cohort for the Investigation of Diabetic Kidney Disease Pathogenesis and Progression. Building a Physician/Advanced Practice Provider Partnership for Inpatient Dialysis Care. Changes in Microbiome in Patients with Kidney Injury after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Palliative Care Intervention Among Older or Adults with Advanced CKD and their Caregivers. Risk of Postoperative Hypermagnesemia in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Assisted Cardiovascular Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1