rRNA operon improves species-level classification of bacteria and microbial community analysis compared to 16S rRNA.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Microbiology spectrum Pub Date : 2024-11-05 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1128/spectrum.00931-24
Sohyoung Won, Seoae Cho, Heebal Kim
{"title":"rRNA operon improves species-level classification of bacteria and microbial community analysis compared to 16S rRNA.","authors":"Sohyoung Won, Seoae Cho, Heebal Kim","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.00931-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Precise identification of species is fundamental in microbial genomics and is crucial for understanding the microbial communities. While the 16S rRNA gene, particularly its V3-V4 regions, has been extensively employed for microbial identification, however has limitations in achieving species-level resolution. Advancements in long-read sequencing technologies have highlighted the rRNA operon as a more accurate marker for microbial classification and analysis than the 16S rRNA gene. This study aims to compare the accuracy of species classification and microbial community analysis using the rRNA operon versus the 16S rRNA gene. We evaluated the species classification accuracy of the rRNA operon,16S rRNA gene, and 16S rRNA V3-V4 regions using a BLAST-based method and a k-mer matching-based method with public data available from NCBI. We further performed simulations to model microbial community analysis. We accessed the performance using each marker in community composition estimation and differential abundance analysis. Our findings demonstrate that the rRNA operon offers an advantage over the 16S rRNA gene and its V3-V4 regions for species-level classification within the genus. When applied to microbial community analysis, the rRNA operon enables a more accurate determination of composition. Using the rRNA operon yielded more reliable results in differential abundance analysis as well.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>We quantitatively demonstrated that the rRNA operon outperformed the 16S rRNA and its V3-V4 regions in accuracy for both individual species identification and species-level microbial community analysis. Our findings can provide guidelines for selecting appropriate markers in the field of microbial research.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0093124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00931-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precise identification of species is fundamental in microbial genomics and is crucial for understanding the microbial communities. While the 16S rRNA gene, particularly its V3-V4 regions, has been extensively employed for microbial identification, however has limitations in achieving species-level resolution. Advancements in long-read sequencing technologies have highlighted the rRNA operon as a more accurate marker for microbial classification and analysis than the 16S rRNA gene. This study aims to compare the accuracy of species classification and microbial community analysis using the rRNA operon versus the 16S rRNA gene. We evaluated the species classification accuracy of the rRNA operon,16S rRNA gene, and 16S rRNA V3-V4 regions using a BLAST-based method and a k-mer matching-based method with public data available from NCBI. We further performed simulations to model microbial community analysis. We accessed the performance using each marker in community composition estimation and differential abundance analysis. Our findings demonstrate that the rRNA operon offers an advantage over the 16S rRNA gene and its V3-V4 regions for species-level classification within the genus. When applied to microbial community analysis, the rRNA operon enables a more accurate determination of composition. Using the rRNA operon yielded more reliable results in differential abundance analysis as well.

Importance: We quantitatively demonstrated that the rRNA operon outperformed the 16S rRNA and its V3-V4 regions in accuracy for both individual species identification and species-level microbial community analysis. Our findings can provide guidelines for selecting appropriate markers in the field of microbial research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与 16S rRNA 相比,rRNA 操作子可改进细菌的物种级分类和微生物群落分析。
物种的精确鉴定是微生物基因组学的基础,也是了解微生物群落的关键。虽然 16S rRNA 基因,特别是其 V3-V4 区域,已被广泛用于微生物鉴定,但在实现物种级分辨率方面存在局限性。长线程测序技术的进步凸显了 rRNA 操作子是比 16S rRNA 基因更准确的微生物分类和分析标记。本研究旨在比较使用 rRNA 操作子和 16S rRNA 基因进行物种分类和微生物群落分析的准确性。我们使用基于 BLAST 的方法和基于 k-mer 匹配的方法,利用 NCBI 提供的公开数据,评估了 rRNA 操作子、16S rRNA 基因和 16S rRNA V3-V4 区域的物种分类准确性。我们进一步进行了模拟,以建立微生物群落分析模型。我们访问了每个标记在群落组成估计和差异丰度分析中的表现。我们的研究结果表明,与 16S rRNA 基因及其 V3-V4 区域相比,rRNA 操作子在属内物种级分类方面更具优势。当应用于微生物群落分析时,rRNA 操作子能更准确地确定其组成。在差异丰度分析中,使用 rRNA 操作子也能获得更可靠的结果:我们通过定量分析证明,在单个物种鉴定和物种级微生物群落分析方面,rRNA 操作子的准确性优于 16S rRNA 及其 V3-V4 区域。我们的研究结果可为微生物研究领域选择合适的标记物提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of commercial susceptibility testing methods for in vitro determining daptomycin susceptibility in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Grass supplementation to a pellet-based diet fails to enrich gut microbiomes with wild-like functions in captive-bred hares. Paired genomic and proteomic analysis of Acinetobacter towneri from waste sludge reveals an extensive repertoire of enzymes for breakdown of hydrocarbons. Verapamil HCl demonstrates antiviral activity against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by regulating Ca2+ influx and promoting type I interferon production. One-step multiplex PCR assay for identification of Mycobacterium kansasii complex species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1