Assessment of chemical-shift and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating malignant and benign vertebral lesions in oncologic patients. A single institution experience.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiology and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-04 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.2478/raon-2024-0049
Marija B Mijaljevic, Zorica C Milosevic, Slobodan Đ Lavrnic, Zorica M Jokovic, Danica I Ninkovic, Radoje M Tubic, Rajna R Jankovic
{"title":"Assessment of chemical-shift and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating malignant and benign vertebral lesions in oncologic patients. A single institution experience.","authors":"Marija B Mijaljevic, Zorica C Milosevic, Slobodan Đ Lavrnic, Zorica M Jokovic, Danica I Ninkovic, Radoje M Tubic, Rajna R Jankovic","doi":"10.2478/raon-2024-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To analyze the contribution of two non-standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques the chemical-shift image (CSI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in distinguishing malignant and benign vertebral bone marrow lesions (VBMLs).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Conventional spine MRI protocol, followed by CSI and DWI was performed with a 1.5 T system on 102 oncologic patients between January 2020 and December 2023. From the identified 325 VBMLs, 102 representative lesions (one per patient) were selected. VBMLs were divided into malignant (n = 74) and benign (n = 28) based on histopathology, or imaging follow-up. The quantitative parameters for VBMLs assessment were signal intensity ratio (SIR) derived from CSI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from DWI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The malignant VBMLs had significantly higher SIR values (p < 0.05) and lower ADC values compared to benign VBMLs (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.953 (p < 0.001) for SIR, and 0.894 for ADC (p < 0.001) (cut-off at > 0.82, and ≤ 1.57x10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity for SIR were 93.6%, and 88.5%, while for ADC were 88.2% and 92.3% (respectively). The combined use of SIR and ADC improved the diagnostic accuracy to AUC of 0.988 (p < 0.001, cut-off at > 0.19), sensitivity, and specificity of 100.0% and 90.9% (respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quantitative parameters, SIR and ADC, derived from two non-standard MRI techniques, CSI, and DWI, showed diagnostic strength in differentiating malignant and benign VBMLs. Combining both methods can further enhance the diagnostic performance and accuracy of spine MRI in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"527-534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To analyze the contribution of two non-standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques the chemical-shift image (CSI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in distinguishing malignant and benign vertebral bone marrow lesions (VBMLs).

Patients and methods: Conventional spine MRI protocol, followed by CSI and DWI was performed with a 1.5 T system on 102 oncologic patients between January 2020 and December 2023. From the identified 325 VBMLs, 102 representative lesions (one per patient) were selected. VBMLs were divided into malignant (n = 74) and benign (n = 28) based on histopathology, or imaging follow-up. The quantitative parameters for VBMLs assessment were signal intensity ratio (SIR) derived from CSI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from DWI.

Results: The malignant VBMLs had significantly higher SIR values (p < 0.05) and lower ADC values compared to benign VBMLs (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.953 (p < 0.001) for SIR, and 0.894 for ADC (p < 0.001) (cut-off at > 0.82, and ≤ 1.57x10-3 mm2/s, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity for SIR were 93.6%, and 88.5%, while for ADC were 88.2% and 92.3% (respectively). The combined use of SIR and ADC improved the diagnostic accuracy to AUC of 0.988 (p < 0.001, cut-off at > 0.19), sensitivity, and specificity of 100.0% and 90.9% (respectively).

Conclusions: Quantitative parameters, SIR and ADC, derived from two non-standard MRI techniques, CSI, and DWI, showed diagnostic strength in differentiating malignant and benign VBMLs. Combining both methods can further enhance the diagnostic performance and accuracy of spine MRI in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化学位移和弥散加权磁共振成像在区分肿瘤患者脊椎恶性和良性病变方面的评估。单一机构的经验。
背景:分析化学位移成像(CSI)和弥散加权成像(DWI)这两种非标准磁共振成像(MRI)技术在区分恶性和良性椎体骨髓病变(VBMLs)中的作用:2020年1月至2023年12月期间,使用1.5 T系统对102名肿瘤患者进行了常规脊柱核磁共振成像,随后进行了CSI和DWI成像。从确定的 325 个 VBML 中选出 102 个有代表性的病灶(每个患者一个)。根据组织病理学或成像随访结果,VBML 被分为恶性(n = 74)和良性(n = 28)。VBMLs的定量评估参数为CSI得出的信号强度比(SIR)和DWI得出的表观弥散系数(ADC):结果:与良性 VBMLs 相比,恶性 VBMLs 的 SIR 值明显更高(P < 0.05),ADC 值更低(P < 0.05)。SIR的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.953(p < 0.001),ADC的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.894(p < 0.001)(临界值分别为> 0.82和≤ 1.57x10-3 mm2/s)。SIR 的灵敏度和特异度分别为 93.6% 和 88.5%,而 ADC 的灵敏度和特异度分别为 88.2% 和 92.3%。联合使用 SIR 和 ADC 提高了诊断准确性,其 AUC 为 0.988(P < 0.001,临界值 > 0.19),灵敏度和特异性分别为 100.0% 和 90.9%:由 CSI 和 DWI 这两种非标准磁共振成像技术得出的定量参数 SIR 和 ADC 在区分恶性和良性 VBML 方面显示出了诊断优势。在临床实践中,结合这两种方法可进一步提高脊柱磁共振成像的诊断性能和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
期刊最新文献
Whole-body PET/MRI to detect bone metastases: comparison of the diagnostic performance of the sequences. Liver volumetry improves evaluation of treatment response to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases. The initial results of MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy in high volume tertiary center. [18F]fluorocholine PET vs. [99mTc]sestamibi scintigraphy for detection and localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: outcomes and resource efficiency. Current Operating Procedure (COP) for Bleomycin ElectroScleroTherapy (BEST) of low-flow vascular malformations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1