Cultural translation of the ethical dimension: a study on the reliability and validity of the Chinese nurses' professional ethical dilemma scale.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02380-3
Wei Hu, Ke Shang, Xin Wang, Xia Li
{"title":"Cultural translation of the ethical dimension: a study on the reliability and validity of the Chinese nurses' professional ethical dilemma scale.","authors":"Wei Hu, Ke Shang, Xin Wang, Xia Li","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02380-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantifying the professional ethical challenges that nurses encounter is crucial for both theoretical insights and practical outcomes. The objective of this research is to assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese adaptation of the Moral Distress Scale for Healthcare Professionals (MD-APPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2024, a survey approach was utilized to engage with several tertiary-level healthcare institutions throughout China. A cohort of 448 nursing professionals who satisfied the specified selection benchmarks was consequently incorporated into the study. To evaluate the scale's reliability and validity, methods including the Content Validity Index (CVI), Factor Analysis-both Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory (CFA)-alongside assessments of internal consistency and test-retest reliability were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expert evaluations yielded an I-CVI of 0.90, suggesting good content validity for the MD-APPS's Chinese adaptation. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed a bi-dimensional framework with 7 components, explaining 56.34% of the cumulative variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) outcomes displayed a χ-square/df ratio of 1.542. The estimate for Robust RMSEA was 0.054, and the SRMR was ascertained to be 0.041. Indices for both Robust TLI and Robust CFI surpassed the 0.9 threshold, indicating an acceptable fit; this aspect was supported by a P-value (Chi-square) of 0.094. The internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's α, was found to be 0.74, while the test-retest reliability over a two-week period reached 0.964. These findings provide initial evidence for the psychometric properties of the Chinese MD-APPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Chinese adaptation of the MD-APPS demonstrates promising initial psychometric properties, suggesting its potential suitability for exploring nurses' professional ethical challenges within the Chinese cultural context. This scale may facilitate the identification of diverse elements influencing nurses' professional ethics and the assessment of the ethical climate in nursing practices. However, further validation studies are needed to fully establish its psychometric robustness across various healthcare settings in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02380-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantifying the professional ethical challenges that nurses encounter is crucial for both theoretical insights and practical outcomes. The objective of this research is to assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese adaptation of the Moral Distress Scale for Healthcare Professionals (MD-APPS).

Methods: In 2024, a survey approach was utilized to engage with several tertiary-level healthcare institutions throughout China. A cohort of 448 nursing professionals who satisfied the specified selection benchmarks was consequently incorporated into the study. To evaluate the scale's reliability and validity, methods including the Content Validity Index (CVI), Factor Analysis-both Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory (CFA)-alongside assessments of internal consistency and test-retest reliability were employed.

Results: Expert evaluations yielded an I-CVI of 0.90, suggesting good content validity for the MD-APPS's Chinese adaptation. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed a bi-dimensional framework with 7 components, explaining 56.34% of the cumulative variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) outcomes displayed a χ-square/df ratio of 1.542. The estimate for Robust RMSEA was 0.054, and the SRMR was ascertained to be 0.041. Indices for both Robust TLI and Robust CFI surpassed the 0.9 threshold, indicating an acceptable fit; this aspect was supported by a P-value (Chi-square) of 0.094. The internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's α, was found to be 0.74, while the test-retest reliability over a two-week period reached 0.964. These findings provide initial evidence for the psychometric properties of the Chinese MD-APPS.

Conclusion: The Chinese adaptation of the MD-APPS demonstrates promising initial psychometric properties, suggesting its potential suitability for exploring nurses' professional ethical challenges within the Chinese cultural context. This scale may facilitate the identification of diverse elements influencing nurses' professional ethics and the assessment of the ethical climate in nursing practices. However, further validation studies are needed to fully establish its psychometric robustness across various healthcare settings in China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦理维度的文化翻译:中国护士职业道德困境量表的信度和效度研究。
背景:量化护士遇到的职业道德挑战对于理论洞察和实践结果都至关重要。本研究旨在评估医护人员道德压力量表(MD-APPS)中文版的心理测量特性:方法:2024 年,我们采用调查的方法与全国多家三级医疗机构进行了接触。方法:2024 年,我们采用调查的方法,对全国多家三级医疗机构进行了调查,最终将 448 名符合规定选拔标准的护理专业人员纳入研究。为了评估量表的信度和效度,我们采用了内容效度指数(CVI)、因子分析(探索性 EFA 和确证性 CFA)以及内部一致性和重测信度评估等方法:专家评估得出的 I-CVI 为 0.90,表明 MD-APPS 的中文改编版具有良好的内容效度。探索性因子分析(EFA)揭示了一个包含 7 个成分的双维框架,解释了 56.34% 的累积方差。确认性因子分析(CFA)结果显示,χ-square/df 比值为 1.542。稳健 RMSEA 的估计值为 0.054,SRMR 为 0.041。稳健 TLI 和稳健 CFI 的指数均超过了 0.9 的临界值,表明拟合度可以接受;P 值(Chi-square)为 0.094,证明了这一点。用 Cronbach's α 测量的内部一致性为 0.74,而两周内的测试-再测可靠性达到 0.964。这些结果初步证明了中文 MD-APPS 的心理测量学特性:MD-APPS的中文改编版显示出良好的心理测量学特性,表明其可能适用于探讨中国文化背景下护士面临的职业道德挑战。该量表有助于识别影响护士职业道德的各种因素,并评估护理实践中的道德氛围。然而,还需要进一步的验证研究来充分确定其在中国不同医疗环境下的心理测量稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Coping strategies of intensive care units nurses in alarm management: a qualitative research study. Cultural translation of the ethical dimension: a study on the reliability and validity of the Chinese nurses' professional ethical dilemma scale. Effectiveness of donning and doffing personal protective equipment education using video debriefing among Korean undergraduate nursing students. Relationship between perceived value, attitudes, and academic motivation in distance learning among nursing students in rural areas. Testing the validity and reliability of the Korean nursing surveillance scale: a methodological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1