Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing total pancreatectomy.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02575-0
Tianyu Li, Chen Lin, Bangbo Zhao, Zeru Li, Yutong Zhao, Xianlin Han, Menghua Dai, Junchao Guo, Weibin Wang
{"title":"Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing total pancreatectomy.","authors":"Tianyu Li, Chen Lin, Bangbo Zhao, Zeru Li, Yutong Zhao, Xianlin Han, Menghua Dai, Junchao Guo, Weibin Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02575-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current research on delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery is predominantly focused on pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), with little exploration into DGE following total pancreatectomy (TP). This study aims to investigate the risk factors for DGE after TP and develop a predictive model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 106 consecutive cases of TP performed between January 2013 and December 2023 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH). After applying the inclusion criteria, 96 cases were selected for analysis. These patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 67) and a validation set (n = 29) in a 7:3 ratio. LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with clinically relevant DGE (grades B/C) and to construct a predictive nomogram. The ROC curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC) were employed to evaluate the model's prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predictive model identified end-to-side gastrointestinal anastomosis, intraoperative blood transfusion, and venous reconstruction as risk factors for clinically relevant DGE after TP. The ROC was 0.853 (95%CI 0.681-0.900) in the training set and 0.789 (95%CI 0.727-0.857) in the validation set. The calibration curve, DCA, and CIC confirmed the accuracy and practicality of the nomogram.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a novel predictive model that accurately identifies potential risk factors associated with clinically relevant DGE in patients undergoing TP.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02575-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current research on delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery is predominantly focused on pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), with little exploration into DGE following total pancreatectomy (TP). This study aims to investigate the risk factors for DGE after TP and develop a predictive model.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 106 consecutive cases of TP performed between January 2013 and December 2023 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH). After applying the inclusion criteria, 96 cases were selected for analysis. These patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 67) and a validation set (n = 29) in a 7:3 ratio. LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with clinically relevant DGE (grades B/C) and to construct a predictive nomogram. The ROC curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC) were employed to evaluate the model's prediction accuracy.

Results: The predictive model identified end-to-side gastrointestinal anastomosis, intraoperative blood transfusion, and venous reconstruction as risk factors for clinically relevant DGE after TP. The ROC was 0.853 (95%CI 0.681-0.900) in the training set and 0.789 (95%CI 0.727-0.857) in the validation set. The calibration curve, DCA, and CIC confirmed the accuracy and practicality of the nomogram.

Conclusion: We developed a novel predictive model that accurately identifies potential risk factors associated with clinically relevant DGE in patients undergoing TP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证用于预测全胰腺切除术患者临床相关延迟胃排空的提名图。
背景:目前关于胰腺手术后延迟胃排空(DGE)的研究主要集中在胰十二指肠切除术(PD)上,而对全胰切除术(TP)后延迟胃排空的研究很少。本研究旨在调查全胰切除术后 DGE 的风险因素,并建立一个预测模型:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间在北京协和医院(PUMCH)进行的 106 例连续全胰腺切除术(TP)病例。应用纳入标准后,选取 96 例进行分析。这些患者按 7:3 的比例随机分为训练集(67 例)和验证集(29 例)。采用 LASSO 回归和多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与临床相关的 DGE(B/C 级)相关的因素,并构建预测提名图。采用 ROC 曲线、校准曲线、决策曲线分析 (DCA) 和临床影响曲线 (CIC) 评估模型的预测准确性:结果:预测模型确定了端侧胃肠吻合、术中输血和静脉重建是 TP 术后出现临床相关 DGE 的风险因素。训练集的 ROC 为 0.853(95%CI 0.681-0.900),验证集的 ROC 为 0.789(95%CI 0.727-0.857)。校准曲线、DCA和CIC证实了提名图的准确性和实用性:我们建立了一个新的预测模型,该模型能准确识别与接受 TP 患者临床相关 DGE 相关的潜在风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a narrative review. The impact of qualitative [18F]FDG PET/CT in predicting clinical outcomes of post-surgical differentiated thyroid cancer patients with elevated thyroglobulin and negative radioiodine whole-body scan. Application of RhBMP-2 in Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Cumulative sum analysis for evaluating learning curve of endoscopic lateral neck dissection. Influence of the ligation sequence of the inferior mesenteric artery and vein on circulating tumor cells in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a prospective pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1