Enhancing postural balance assessment through neural network-based lower-limb muscle strength evaluation with reduced markers.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1080/10255842.2024.2410505
Jianhan Chen, Yueshan Huang, Runfeng Li, Hancong Wu, Jin Ke, Chengrang Liu, Yonghua Lao
{"title":"Enhancing postural balance assessment through neural network-based lower-limb muscle strength evaluation with reduced markers.","authors":"Jianhan Chen, Yueshan Huang, Runfeng Li, Hancong Wu, Jin Ke, Chengrang Liu, Yonghua Lao","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2024.2410505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aiming to simplify the data acquisition process for balance diagnosis and focused on muscle, a direct factor affecting balance, to assess and judge postural stability. Utilizing a publicly available kinematic dataset, the research retained 3D coordinates and mechanical data for 8 markers on the lower limbs. By integrating this data with the musculoskeletal model in OpenSim, inverse kinematic calculations were performed to derive muscle forces. These forces, alongside the coordinates, were split into an 8:2 training and test set ratio. A neural network was then developed to predict muscle forces using normalized coordinate data from the training set as input, with corresponding muscle force data as training labels. The model's accuracy was confirmed on the test set, achieving coefficients of determination (<math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math>) above 0.99 for 276 muscle forces. Furthermore, the Force Maximum Percentage Difference (<i>FMPD</i>) was introduced as a novel criterion to evaluate and visualize lower limb balance, revealing significant discrepancies between the patient and control groups. This study successfully demonstrates that the neural network model can precisely predict lower limb muscle forces using reduced markers and introduces <i>FMPD</i> as an effective tool for assessing limb balance, providing a robust framework for future diagnostic and rehabilitative applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2024.2410505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aiming to simplify the data acquisition process for balance diagnosis and focused on muscle, a direct factor affecting balance, to assess and judge postural stability. Utilizing a publicly available kinematic dataset, the research retained 3D coordinates and mechanical data for 8 markers on the lower limbs. By integrating this data with the musculoskeletal model in OpenSim, inverse kinematic calculations were performed to derive muscle forces. These forces, alongside the coordinates, were split into an 8:2 training and test set ratio. A neural network was then developed to predict muscle forces using normalized coordinate data from the training set as input, with corresponding muscle force data as training labels. The model's accuracy was confirmed on the test set, achieving coefficients of determination (R2) above 0.99 for 276 muscle forces. Furthermore, the Force Maximum Percentage Difference (FMPD) was introduced as a novel criterion to evaluate and visualize lower limb balance, revealing significant discrepancies between the patient and control groups. This study successfully demonstrates that the neural network model can precisely predict lower limb muscle forces using reduced markers and introduces FMPD as an effective tool for assessing limb balance, providing a robust framework for future diagnostic and rehabilitative applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过基于神经网络的下肢肌肉力量评估,减少标记物,加强姿势平衡评估。
该研究旨在简化平衡诊断的数据采集过程,并将重点放在肌肉这一影响平衡的直接因素上,以评估和判断姿势的稳定性。研究利用公开的运动学数据集,保留了下肢 8 个标记的三维坐标和机械数据。通过将这些数据与 OpenSim 中的肌肉骨骼模型整合,进行了反运动学计算,得出了肌肉力量。这些肌力与坐标一起被分成 8:2 的训练集和测试集。然后开发了一个神经网络,使用训练集的归一化坐标数据作为输入,以相应的肌肉力量数据作为训练标签,预测肌肉力量。该模型的准确性在测试集上得到了证实,276 种肌肉力量的决定系数 (R2) 超过了 0.99。此外,研究还引入了最大肌力百分比差(FMPD)作为评估和可视化下肢平衡的新标准,发现了患者组和对照组之间的显著差异。这项研究成功地证明了神经网络模型可以利用减少的标记精确预测下肢肌肉力量,并将 FMPD 作为评估肢体平衡的有效工具,为未来的诊断和康复应用提供了一个稳健的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
179
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.
期刊最新文献
The use of finite element models for backface deformation and body armour design: a systematic review. Significance of peripheral layer: the case of mucus flow through a ciliated tube using Rabinowitsch model. A high-fidelity biomechanical modeling framework for injury prediction during frontal car crash. Multivariable identification based MPC for closed-loop glucose regulation subject to individual variability. Research on MI EEG signal classification algorithm using multi-model fusion strategy coupling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1