Patient navigation in reproductive healthcare.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000997
Melissa Schechter, Eve Espey, Jamie W Krashin
{"title":"Patient navigation in reproductive healthcare.","authors":"Melissa Schechter, Eve Espey, Jamie W Krashin","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review summarizes evidence about barriers to abortion care pre- Dobbs and post- Dobbs , inequities in abortion access, and approaches to improving access to abortion care with use of patient navigators.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The Dobbs decision and resulting state-level restrictions exacerbated economic, knowledge, and logistic barriers to abortion care. Abortion funds and emotional support are two main resources to help address these barriers; however, only with coordination can patients and clinics fully benefit from the resources. Patient navigation provides that coordination. Evidence shows it improves reproductive outcomes, is acceptable to patients and providers, and engages community health workers and community-based organizations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Increasing legal restrictions and barriers to abortion care have motivated advocates to identify effective interventions to facilitate patient-centered and culturally competent care. Navigators have improved postpartum care by increasing attendance, education and helping coordinate overall care. They have improved referrals and access to abortion care in statewide programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"420-425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review summarizes evidence about barriers to abortion care pre- Dobbs and post- Dobbs , inequities in abortion access, and approaches to improving access to abortion care with use of patient navigators.

Recent findings: The Dobbs decision and resulting state-level restrictions exacerbated economic, knowledge, and logistic barriers to abortion care. Abortion funds and emotional support are two main resources to help address these barriers; however, only with coordination can patients and clinics fully benefit from the resources. Patient navigation provides that coordination. Evidence shows it improves reproductive outcomes, is acceptable to patients and providers, and engages community health workers and community-based organizations.

Summary: Increasing legal restrictions and barriers to abortion care have motivated advocates to identify effective interventions to facilitate patient-centered and culturally competent care. Navigators have improved postpartum care by increasing attendance, education and helping coordinate overall care. They have improved referrals and access to abortion care in statewide programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生殖保健中的患者导航。
综述目的:本综述总结了有关多布斯案之前和之后堕胎护理的障碍、堕胎机会不平等以及使用患者导航员改善堕胎护理机会的方法的证据:多布斯案的判决及由此产生的州一级限制加剧了堕胎护理的经济、知识和后勤障碍。堕胎基金和情感支持是帮助解决这些障碍的两大资源;然而,只有通过协调,患者和诊所才能充分受益于这些资源。患者导引服务就提供了这种协调。有证据表明,它能改善生殖结果,为患者和医疗服务提供者所接受,并能吸引社区卫生工作者和社区组织的参与。摘要:堕胎护理方面日益增多的法律限制和障碍促使倡导者确定有效的干预措施,以促进以患者为中心和具有文化适应性的护理。导航员通过提高就诊率、加强教育和帮助协调整体护理,改善了产后护理。在全州范围内,他们改善了转诊和获得堕胎护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Access to maternity care: challenges and solutions for improving equity across US communities. Contemporary uses of "lethal" or "life limiting" terminology in perinatal research. Rho(D) immune globulin shortage and fetal Rh(D) screening with cell-free DNA. State of the art endocrine treatments for patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer in 2025. Sleep disturbance and menopause.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1