Mechanical analysis of modified femoral neck system in the treatment of osteoporotic femoral neck fractures.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07907-y
Chong Nan, Yuxiu Liu, Di Zhang, Yazhuo Qin, Hetong Yu, Yong Liu, Zhanbei Ma
{"title":"Mechanical analysis of modified femoral neck system in the treatment of osteoporotic femoral neck fractures.","authors":"Chong Nan, Yuxiu Liu, Di Zhang, Yazhuo Qin, Hetong Yu, Yong Liu, Zhanbei Ma","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-07907-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the explicit biomechanical advantages associated with FNS, it is currently inconclusive, based on the existing literature, whether Femoral Neck System (FNS) outperforms Cannulated cancellous screws (CSS) in all aspects. Due to variances in bone morphology and bone density between the elderly and young cohorts, additional research is warranted to ascertain whether the benefits of FNS remain applicable to elderly osteoporosis patients. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties of FNS in osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and propose optimization strategies including additional anti-rotation screw.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture models were reconstructed using finite element numerical techniques. The CSS, FNS, and modified FNS (M-FNS) models were created based on features and parameterization. The various internal fixations were individually assembled with the assigned normal and osteoporotic models. In the static analysis mode, uniform stress loads were imposed on all models. The deformation and stress variations of the femur and internal fixation models were recorded. Simultaneously, descriptions of shear stress and strain energy were also incorporated into the figures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following bone mass reduction, deformations in CSS, FNS, and M-FNS increased by 47%, 52%, and 40%, respectively. The equivalent stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 3%, 43%, 17%, respectively. Meanwhile, variations in strain energy and shear stress were observed. The strain energy increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 76%, and 5%, respectively. The shear stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 65% and 44%, respectively. Within the osteoporotic model, M-FNS demonstrated the lowest total displacement, shear stress, and strain energy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modified FNS showed better stability in the osteoporotic model (OM). Using FNS alone may not exhibit immediate shear resistance advantages in OM. Concurrently, the addition of one anti-rotation screw can be regarded as a potential optimization choice, ensuring a harmonious alignment with the structural characteristics of FNS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07907-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the explicit biomechanical advantages associated with FNS, it is currently inconclusive, based on the existing literature, whether Femoral Neck System (FNS) outperforms Cannulated cancellous screws (CSS) in all aspects. Due to variances in bone morphology and bone density between the elderly and young cohorts, additional research is warranted to ascertain whether the benefits of FNS remain applicable to elderly osteoporosis patients. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties of FNS in osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and propose optimization strategies including additional anti-rotation screw.

Methods: The Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture models were reconstructed using finite element numerical techniques. The CSS, FNS, and modified FNS (M-FNS) models were created based on features and parameterization. The various internal fixations were individually assembled with the assigned normal and osteoporotic models. In the static analysis mode, uniform stress loads were imposed on all models. The deformation and stress variations of the femur and internal fixation models were recorded. Simultaneously, descriptions of shear stress and strain energy were also incorporated into the figures.

Results: Following bone mass reduction, deformations in CSS, FNS, and M-FNS increased by 47%, 52%, and 40%, respectively. The equivalent stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 3%, 43%, 17%, respectively. Meanwhile, variations in strain energy and shear stress were observed. The strain energy increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 76%, and 5%, respectively. The shear stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 65% and 44%, respectively. Within the osteoporotic model, M-FNS demonstrated the lowest total displacement, shear stress, and strain energy.

Conclusion: Modified FNS showed better stability in the osteoporotic model (OM). Using FNS alone may not exhibit immediate shear resistance advantages in OM. Concurrently, the addition of one anti-rotation screw can be regarded as a potential optimization choice, ensuring a harmonious alignment with the structural characteristics of FNS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良股骨颈系统在治疗骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折中的力学分析。
背景:尽管股骨颈系统(FNS)具有明显的生物力学优势,但根据现有文献,股骨颈系统(FNS)是否在所有方面都优于套筒松质骨螺钉(CSS),目前尚无定论。由于老年人和年轻人的骨形态和骨密度存在差异,因此有必要开展更多研究,以确定 FNS 的优点是否仍然适用于老年骨质疏松症患者。本研究旨在探讨 FNS 在骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折中的生物力学特性,并提出包括额外防旋转螺钉在内的优化策略:方法:采用有限元数值技术重建了 Pauwels III 型股骨颈骨折模型。方法:采用有限元数值技术重建 Pauwels III 型股骨颈骨折模型,并根据特征和参数化创建 CSS、FNS 和改良 FNS(M-FNS)模型。各种内固定装置分别与指定的正常和骨质疏松模型组装在一起。在静态分析模式下,对所有模型施加均匀的应力载荷。记录股骨和内固定模型的变形和应力变化。同时,剪应力和应变能的描述也被纳入图表中:结果:骨量减少后,CSS、FNS 和 M-FNS 的变形分别增加了 47%、52% 和 40%。CSS、FNS 和 M-FNS 的等效应力增量分别为 3%、43% 和 17%。同时,应变能和剪应力也出现了变化。CSS、FNS 和 M-FNS 的应变能增量分别为 4%、76% 和 5%。CSS、FNS 和 M-FNS 的剪应力增量分别为 4%、65% 和 44%。在骨质疏松症模型中,M-FNS 的总位移、剪应力和应变能最低:结论:改良 FNS 在骨质疏松模型(OM)中表现出更好的稳定性。在骨质疏松症模型中,单独使用 FNS 可能不会立即显示出抗剪优势。同时,增加一个防旋转螺钉可被视为一种潜在的优化选择,可确保与 FNS 的结构特征协调一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Innovative method for efficient placement of a working cannula in uniportal transarticular full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: transarticular trephonic plasty (TTP). Internet-based digital interventions on rehabilitation for patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Specialty-related differences in diagnosing hip-spine syndrome: a multi-center retrospective cohort study. Perioperative transition experience of patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy day surgery: a qualitative exploratory study using patient journey mapping. Impact of plate placement position on the efficacy and safety of derotational distal femoral osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in treating recurrent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1