Validity of Endometrial Cavity Length on 3D Pelvic Ultrasound before Endometrial Ablation.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Southern Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001736
Kayla Shine, Rachael Cowherd, Alexandra Rowin, Raksha Soora, Michelle Meglin
{"title":"Validity of Endometrial Cavity Length on 3D Pelvic Ultrasound before Endometrial Ablation.","authors":"Kayla Shine, Rachael Cowherd, Alexandra Rowin, Raksha Soora, Michelle Meglin","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare endometrial cavity length measurements obtained by preoperative three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of coronal images on pelvic ultrasound with intraoperative endometrial cavity measurements obtained in advance of Minerva endometrial ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of 41 individuals who underwent a Minerva endometrial ablation between August 1, 2018 and March 15, 2022 at a single academic medical center. Patients were excluded if they had an in-clinic ablation or no ultrasound with 3D uterine volume within 180 days before surgery. Physician sonologists measured the endometrial cavity length using 3D coronal reconstruction of the cavity. Two measurements were obtained by separate physicians who were blinded to intraoperative values. Intraoperative endometrial cavity lengths were obtained from operative reports. A Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the agreement of intraoperative and ultrasound measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean intraoperative endometrial cavity length (50.7 ± 7.8 mm) was greater than the mean endometrial cavity length by 3D coronal reconstruction of pelvic ultrasound (36.1 ± 6.2 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The average difference between intraoperative and ultrasound measurements of cavity length was 14.6 ± 9.0 mm. The agreement between measurements was poor (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.06). Using a Bland-Altman plot, the limits of agreement (-3.1 to 32 mm) exceeded the a priori acceptable limits of agreement (-10 to 10 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that preoperative coronal endometrial cavity length measurements by ultrasound are not a valid substitute for intraoperative measurements before Minerva ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 10","pages":"599-602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare endometrial cavity length measurements obtained by preoperative three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of coronal images on pelvic ultrasound with intraoperative endometrial cavity measurements obtained in advance of Minerva endometrial ablation.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 41 individuals who underwent a Minerva endometrial ablation between August 1, 2018 and March 15, 2022 at a single academic medical center. Patients were excluded if they had an in-clinic ablation or no ultrasound with 3D uterine volume within 180 days before surgery. Physician sonologists measured the endometrial cavity length using 3D coronal reconstruction of the cavity. Two measurements were obtained by separate physicians who were blinded to intraoperative values. Intraoperative endometrial cavity lengths were obtained from operative reports. A Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the agreement of intraoperative and ultrasound measurements.

Results: The mean intraoperative endometrial cavity length (50.7 ± 7.8 mm) was greater than the mean endometrial cavity length by 3D coronal reconstruction of pelvic ultrasound (36.1 ± 6.2 mm, P < 0.0001). The average difference between intraoperative and ultrasound measurements of cavity length was 14.6 ± 9.0 mm. The agreement between measurements was poor (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.06). Using a Bland-Altman plot, the limits of agreement (-3.1 to 32 mm) exceeded the a priori acceptable limits of agreement (-10 to 10 mm).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that preoperative coronal endometrial cavity length measurements by ultrasound are not a valid substitute for intraoperative measurements before Minerva ablation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜消融术前三维盆腔超声检查子宫内膜腔长度的有效性
研究目的本研究旨在比较通过盆腔超声冠状图像术前三维(3D)重建获得的子宫内膜腔长度测量值和术中在Minerva子宫内膜消融术前获得的子宫内膜腔测量值:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2018年8月1日至2022年3月15日期间在一家学术医疗中心接受Minerva子宫内膜消融术的41名患者。如果患者在术前 180 天内进行过门诊消融术或未进行过三维子宫容积超声检查,则排除在外。超声医师使用子宫腔的三维冠状重建测量子宫内膜腔长度。两次测量分别由不同的医生进行,他们对术中测量值都是盲测。术中子宫内膜腔长度来自手术报告。使用Bland-Altman图评估术中测量值与超声测量值的一致性:结果:术中子宫内膜腔平均长度(50.7 ± 7.8 mm)大于盆腔超声三维冠状重建子宫内膜腔平均长度(36.1 ± 6.2 mm,P < 0.0001)。术中和超声测量的子宫腔长度平均相差 14.6 ± 9.0 毫米。测量结果之间的一致性较差(Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.06)。使用 Bland-Altman 图,一致性的极限(-3.1 至 32 毫米)超过了先验可接受的一致性极限(-10 至 10 毫米):我们的研究结果表明,在米涅瓦消融术前通过超声测量子宫内膜腔冠状面长度不能有效替代术中测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Cohort Study of Lt. Col. Luke J. Weathers VA Medical Center Patients with Positive FIT and Incomplete GI Evaluation during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advancement of a Vertically Integrated Training Program (VITP): Introspective Assessment and Expansion. Clinical Shift Distribution in Academic Hospital Medicine Fellowship across 10 Years. Effect of HIV Status and Charlson Comorbidity Index on COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes in a Case-Control Study. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Cirrhosis and Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1