Health Insurance Type and Access to the Indian Health Service Before, During, and After Childbirth Among American Indian and Alaska Native People in the United States.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2024.08.002
Jessica L Liddell, Julia D Interrante, Emily C Sheffield, Hailey A Baker, Katy B Kozhimannil
{"title":"Health Insurance Type and Access to the Indian Health Service Before, During, and After Childbirth Among American Indian and Alaska Native People in the United States.","authors":"Jessica L Liddell, Julia D Interrante, Emily C Sheffield, Hailey A Baker, Katy B Kozhimannil","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people in the United States face elevated childbirth-related risks when compared with non-Hispanic white people. Access to health care is a treaty right of many AI/AN people, often facilitated through the Indian Health Service (IHS), but many AI/AN people do not qualify for or cannot access IHS care and rely on health insurance coverage to access care in other facilities. Our goal was to describe health insurance coverage and access to IHS care before, during, and after childbirth for AI/AN birthing people in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 2016 ton 2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data (44 states and 2 other jurisdictions) for 102,860 postpartum individuals (12,920 AI/AN and 89,940 non-Hispanic white). We calculated weighted percentages, adjusted predicted probabilities, and percentage point differences for health care coverage (insurance type and IHS care) before, during, and after childbirth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 75% of AI/AN birthing people did not have IHS care around the time of childbirth. AI/AN people had greater variability in insurance coverage and more insurance churn (changes in type of insurance, including between coverage and no coverage) during the perinatal period, compared with non-Hispanic white people. Health care coverage differed for rural and urban AI/AN people, with rural AI/AN residents having the lowest prevalence of continuous insurance (60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI/AN birthing people experience insurance churning and limited access to IHS care during the perinatal period. Efforts to improve care for AI/AN birthing people should engage federal, state, and tribal entities to ensure fulfillment of the trust responsibility of the United States and to address health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2024.08.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people in the United States face elevated childbirth-related risks when compared with non-Hispanic white people. Access to health care is a treaty right of many AI/AN people, often facilitated through the Indian Health Service (IHS), but many AI/AN people do not qualify for or cannot access IHS care and rely on health insurance coverage to access care in other facilities. Our goal was to describe health insurance coverage and access to IHS care before, during, and after childbirth for AI/AN birthing people in the United States.

Methods: We analyzed 2016 ton 2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data (44 states and 2 other jurisdictions) for 102,860 postpartum individuals (12,920 AI/AN and 89,940 non-Hispanic white). We calculated weighted percentages, adjusted predicted probabilities, and percentage point differences for health care coverage (insurance type and IHS care) before, during, and after childbirth.

Results: Approximately 75% of AI/AN birthing people did not have IHS care around the time of childbirth. AI/AN people had greater variability in insurance coverage and more insurance churn (changes in type of insurance, including between coverage and no coverage) during the perinatal period, compared with non-Hispanic white people. Health care coverage differed for rural and urban AI/AN people, with rural AI/AN residents having the lowest prevalence of continuous insurance (60%).

Conclusion: AI/AN birthing people experience insurance churning and limited access to IHS care during the perinatal period. Efforts to improve care for AI/AN birthing people should engage federal, state, and tribal entities to ensure fulfillment of the trust responsibility of the United States and to address health inequities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民在分娩前、分娩期间和分娩后的医疗保险类型和获得印第安人医疗服务的情况》(Health Insurance Type and Access to the Indian Health Service Before, During, and After Childbirth Among American Indian and Alaska Native People in the United States)。
背景:与非西班牙裔白人相比,美国的美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)面临着更高的分娩相关风险。获得医疗服务是许多美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的条约权利,通常通过印第安人医疗服务机构(IHS)来实现,但许多美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民没有资格或无法获得印第安人医疗服务机构的医疗服务,只能依靠医疗保险在其他机构获得医疗服务。我们的目标是描述美国印第安人/阿诺人分娩前、分娩期间和分娩后的医疗保险覆盖范围以及获得 IHS 医疗服务的情况:我们分析了 2016 吨 2020 年妊娠风险评估监测系统(44 个州和 2 个其他辖区)中 102,860 名产后人士(12,920 名印第安人/原住民和 89,940 名非西班牙裔白人)的数据。我们计算了加权百分比、调整后的预测概率以及产前、产中和产后医疗保险(保险类型和 IHS 护理)的百分点差异:结果:大约 75% 的印第安人/原住民分娩者在分娩前后没有接受过 IHS 护理。与非西班牙裔白人相比,美国原住民/印第安人在围产期的保险覆盖范围变化更大,保险流失(保险类型的变化,包括有保险和无保险之间的变化)更多。农村和城市的美国原住民/印第安人的医疗保险范围不同,农村美国原住民/印第安人的连续保险率最低(60%):结论:亚裔美国人/印第安人在围产期经历了保险变更和获得综合保健服务的机会有限。为改善对阿拉斯加原住民/印第安人分娩者的护理,联邦、州和部落实体应参与其中,以确保履行美国的信托责任并解决健康不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
Community-dwelling Black Women's Experiences With Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study. "Neither Side Really Knows… What an Abortion Is Like": A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Students' Experiences With Second-Trimester Procedural Abortions. A Mixed Methods Longitudinal Investigation of Maternal Depression Across the Perinatal Period Among Mothers Who Gave Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring Consumer Preferences for Pharmacy Provision of Mifepristone in the Human-centered Design Discovery Phase. "Women's Lives Are on the Line, and Our Hands Are Tied": How Television Is Reckoning With a Post-Dobbs America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1