Do marked discharge summaries with recommendation text boxes enhance patient safety? A nationwide survey.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0037
Thorbjørn H Mikkelsen, Jesper B Nielsen, Maria M Storsveen, Jens Søndergaard
{"title":"Do marked discharge summaries with recommendation text boxes enhance patient safety? A nationwide survey.","authors":"Thorbjørn H Mikkelsen, Jesper B Nielsen, Maria M Storsveen, Jens Søndergaard","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Danish hospital physicians are required to mark their discharge summaries addressing whether the patient's general practitioner (GP) is recommended to follow up as well as suggest follow-up actions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether a new form of discharge summaries may contribute to improve the perceived patient safety following transition from hospitals to general practice.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>This paper reports data from a questionnaire sent to a representative sample of GPs in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A questionnaire was prepared for GPs based on background material, focus group interviews and discussions with relevant professionals. It was subsequently pilot tested by fellow researchers and GPs and revised prior to the presently reported survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 310 participating GPs, 197 (63%) 'totally agree' or 'partly agree' that the marked discharge summaries with a recommendation text box contribute to a better handover to general practice, and 223 (72%) 'totally agree' or 'partly agree' that they improve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of responding GPs believe that the marked discharge summaries with a recommendation text box enhance patient safety and facilitate the transition of care to general practice following hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Danish hospital physicians are required to mark their discharge summaries addressing whether the patient's general practitioner (GP) is recommended to follow up as well as suggest follow-up actions.

Aim: To investigate whether a new form of discharge summaries may contribute to improve the perceived patient safety following transition from hospitals to general practice.

Design & setting: This paper reports data from a questionnaire sent to a representative sample of GPs in Denmark.

Method: A questionnaire was prepared for GPs based on background material, focus group interviews and discussions with relevant professionals. It was subsequently pilot tested by fellow researchers and GPs and revised prior to the presently reported survey.

Results: Of 310 participating GPs, 197 (63%) 'totally agree' or 'partly agree' that the marked discharge summaries with a recommendation text box contribute to a better handover to general practice, and 223 (72%) 'totally agree' or 'partly agree' that they improve patient safety.

Conclusion: The majority of responding GPs believe that the marked discharge summaries with a recommendation text box enhance patient safety and facilitate the transition of care to general practice following hospital discharge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带建议文本框的标记出院摘要能提高患者安全吗?一项全国性调查。
背景:丹麦医院要求医生在出院小结中标注是否建议患者的全科医生(GP)进行随访,并提出随访行动建议。目的:调查新形式的出院小结是否有助于改善从医院转到全科诊所后患者的安全感:本文报告了向丹麦具有代表性的全科医生样本发送的问卷调查数据:根据背景材料、焦点小组访谈以及与相关专业人士的讨论,为全科医生准备了一份问卷。随后,研究人员和全科医生对问卷进行了试点测试,并在目前报告的调查之前对问卷进行了修订:在 310 名参与调查的全科医生中,197 人(63%)"完全同意 "或 "部分同意 "带有建议文本框的标记出院摘要有助于更好地与全科医生进行交接,223 人(72%)"完全同意 "或 "部分同意 "出院摘要能提高患者安全:结论:大多数受访全科医生认为,带有建议文本框的标注出院摘要可提高患者安全,并有助于出院后向全科医生移交护理工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review. Editorial: Global health inequity and primary care. Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of GP experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1