Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1055/a-2434-5177
Deborah R Levy, Sarah Collins Rossetti, Cynthia Brandt, Edward R Melnick, Andrew Hamilton, Seppo Rinne, Dana Womack, Vishnu Mohan
{"title":"Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review.","authors":"Deborah R Levy, Sarah Collins Rossetti, Cynthia Brandt, Edward R Melnick, Andrew Hamilton, Seppo Rinne, Dana Womack, Vishnu Mohan","doi":"10.1055/a-2434-5177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health professions trainees (trainees) are unique as they learn a chosen field while working within electronic health records (EHR). Efforts to mitigate EHR burden have been described for the experienced health professional (HP), but less is understood for trainees. EHR or documentation burden (EHR burden) affects trainees, although not all trainees use EHRs, and use may differ for experienced HPs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a model of how interventions to mitigate EHR burden fit within the trainee EHR workflow: the Trainee EHR Burden Model. 1) Examine trainee experiences of interventions aimed at mitigating EHR burden(scoping review). 2) Adapt an existing workflow model by mapping included studies(concept clarification).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 4-database scoping review applying PRISMA-ScR guidance, examining scholarly, peer-reviewed studies that measured trainee experience of interventions to mitigate EHR burden. We conducted a concept clarification categorizing, then mapping studies to workflow model elements. We adapted the model to intervenable points for trainee EHR burden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 11 studies examining interventions to mitigate EHR burden that measured trainee experience. Interventions included: curriculum, training, coaching on the existing EHR for both simulated or live tasks; evaluating scribes' impact; adding devices or technology tailored to rounds; team communication or data presentation at end-of shift handoffs. Interventions had varying effects on EHR burden, most commonly measured through surveys, and less commonly, direct observation. Most studies had limited sample sizes, focused on inpatient settings, and physician trainees.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few studies measured trainee perspectives of interventions aiming to mitigate EHR burden. Many studies applied quasi-experimental designs and focused on inpatient settings. The Trainee EHR Burden Model, adapted from an existing workflow model, offers a starting place to situate points of intervention in trainee workflow. Further research is needed to design new interventions targeting stages of HP trainee workflow, in a range of clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2434-5177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health professions trainees (trainees) are unique as they learn a chosen field while working within electronic health records (EHR). Efforts to mitigate EHR burden have been described for the experienced health professional (HP), but less is understood for trainees. EHR or documentation burden (EHR burden) affects trainees, although not all trainees use EHRs, and use may differ for experienced HPs.

Objectives: To develop a model of how interventions to mitigate EHR burden fit within the trainee EHR workflow: the Trainee EHR Burden Model. 1) Examine trainee experiences of interventions aimed at mitigating EHR burden(scoping review). 2) Adapt an existing workflow model by mapping included studies(concept clarification).

Methods: We conducted a 4-database scoping review applying PRISMA-ScR guidance, examining scholarly, peer-reviewed studies that measured trainee experience of interventions to mitigate EHR burden. We conducted a concept clarification categorizing, then mapping studies to workflow model elements. We adapted the model to intervenable points for trainee EHR burden.

Results: We identified 11 studies examining interventions to mitigate EHR burden that measured trainee experience. Interventions included: curriculum, training, coaching on the existing EHR for both simulated or live tasks; evaluating scribes' impact; adding devices or technology tailored to rounds; team communication or data presentation at end-of shift handoffs. Interventions had varying effects on EHR burden, most commonly measured through surveys, and less commonly, direct observation. Most studies had limited sample sizes, focused on inpatient settings, and physician trainees.

Conclusion: Few studies measured trainee perspectives of interventions aiming to mitigate EHR burden. Many studies applied quasi-experimental designs and focused on inpatient settings. The Trainee EHR Burden Model, adapted from an existing workflow model, offers a starting place to situate points of intervention in trainee workflow. Further research is needed to design new interventions targeting stages of HP trainee workflow, in a range of clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减轻卫生专业受训人员电子病历和文件负担的干预措施:范围综述。
背景:卫生专业受训人员(受训人员)是独一无二的,他们在电子健康记录(EHR)中学习所选领域的知识。针对有经验的卫生专业人员(HP)减轻电子健康记录负担的努力已有描述,但对受训人员的了解较少。虽然并非所有受训人员都使用电子病历,而且经验丰富的医务人员使用电子病历的情况也可能不同,但电子病历或文档负担(EHR burden)对受训人员还是有影响的:建立一个模型,说明如何在受训者电子健康记录工作流程中采取干预措施减轻电子健康记录负担:受训者电子健康记录负担模型。1) 研究受训者对旨在减轻电子健康记录负担的干预措施的体验(范围审查)。2)通过映射纳入的研究,调整现有的工作流程模型(概念澄清):我们采用 PRISMA-ScR 指南,对 4 个数据库进行了范围审查,审查了衡量受训者对减轻电子病历负担的干预措施的体验的同行评审学术研究。我们进行了概念澄清分类,然后将研究映射到工作流程模型元素。我们将该模型调整为学员电子健康记录负担的可干预点:结果:我们确定了 11 项研究,这些研究探讨了减轻电子健康记录负担的干预措施,并对受训者的经验进行了衡量。干预措施包括:课程、培训、对现有电子病历进行模拟或现场任务指导;评估抄写员的影响;增加适合查房的设备或技术;在交接班时进行团队沟通或数据展示。干预措施对电子病历负担的影响各不相同,最常见的是通过调查来衡量,较少见的是直接观察。大多数研究的样本量有限,主要集中在住院环境和受训医师:结论:很少有研究测量受训者对旨在减轻电子病历负担的干预措施的看法。许多研究采用了准实验设计并侧重于住院环境。受训人员电子病历负担模型改编自现有的工作流程模型,为确定受训人员工作流程中的干预点提供了一个起点。需要进一步开展研究,在各种临床环境中针对 HP 受训人员工作流程的各个阶段设计新的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review. A human-centered approach for designing a social care referral platform. Ethical dimensions of clinical data sharing by US healthcare organizations for purposes beyond direct patient care: Interviews with healthcare leaders. Special Issue on Informatics Education A Longitudinal Graduate Medical Education Curriculum in Clinical Informatics: Function, Structure, and Evaluation. Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients During Teleconsultation. Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1