Longitudinal change in symptom severity in children with ASD: Results from the ELENA cohort.

Florine Dellapiazza, Cécile Rattaz, Cécile Michelon, Hugo Peyre, Marie-Christine Picot, Amaria Baghdadli
{"title":"Longitudinal change in symptom severity in children with ASD: Results from the ELENA cohort.","authors":"Florine Dellapiazza, Cécile Rattaz, Cécile Michelon, Hugo Peyre, Marie-Christine Picot, Amaria Baghdadli","doi":"10.1002/aur.3242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition and understanding the changes in autism symptoms over time is crucial for tailoring support and interventions. This study therefore aimed to investigate the changes in symptom severity in a large cohort of children with ASD over a three-year follow-up period and identify factors that influence these changes. The study included 575 children diagnosed with ASD, ranging in age from 2 to 12 years, who were assessed at baseline and again 3 years later using the Autism Diagnostic Observational Schedule-2 (ADOS-2). ASD severity changes were investigated using the ADOS calibrated severity score (CSS) scores for total, social affect (SA) and restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRB). Results highlight four distinct patterns: stable high, stable low, increased, and decreased severity. The ADOS CSS total score changed for half of the sample, reflecting an increase in ASD severity for 21.9% and a decrease for 29.1% of children. For the other half, the ADOS CSS score remained stable, either high (34.4%) or low (14.6%). While the majority of previous studies reported stability in ASD severity, our findings revealed significant variability with frequent improvements in SA symptoms whereas RRBs remained stable or worsened. Our findings also showed that an improvement in SA was associated with the youngest group and early diagnosis. However, no clinical or sociodemographic factors were linked to changes in RRB, emphasizing the necessity for RRB-specific therapies. The third six-year follow-up point of the ongoing ELENA cohort study will map the long-term trajectories of the severity of ASD symptoms and their potential risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72339,"journal":{"name":"Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition and understanding the changes in autism symptoms over time is crucial for tailoring support and interventions. This study therefore aimed to investigate the changes in symptom severity in a large cohort of children with ASD over a three-year follow-up period and identify factors that influence these changes. The study included 575 children diagnosed with ASD, ranging in age from 2 to 12 years, who were assessed at baseline and again 3 years later using the Autism Diagnostic Observational Schedule-2 (ADOS-2). ASD severity changes were investigated using the ADOS calibrated severity score (CSS) scores for total, social affect (SA) and restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRB). Results highlight four distinct patterns: stable high, stable low, increased, and decreased severity. The ADOS CSS total score changed for half of the sample, reflecting an increase in ASD severity for 21.9% and a decrease for 29.1% of children. For the other half, the ADOS CSS score remained stable, either high (34.4%) or low (14.6%). While the majority of previous studies reported stability in ASD severity, our findings revealed significant variability with frequent improvements in SA symptoms whereas RRBs remained stable or worsened. Our findings also showed that an improvement in SA was associated with the youngest group and early diagnosis. However, no clinical or sociodemographic factors were linked to changes in RRB, emphasizing the necessity for RRB-specific therapies. The third six-year follow-up point of the ongoing ELENA cohort study will map the long-term trajectories of the severity of ASD symptoms and their potential risk factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症儿童症状严重程度的纵向变化:ELENA队列的研究结果。
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是一种终身性神经发育疾病,了解自闭症症状随时间的变化对于调整支持和干预措施至关重要。因此,本研究旨在调查一大批自闭症儿童在三年随访期内症状严重程度的变化,并找出影响这些变化的因素。这项研究包括575名被诊断患有自闭症的儿童,年龄从2岁到12岁不等,他们在基线时接受评估,并在3年后再次接受自闭症诊断观察表-2(ADOS-2)的评估。自闭症严重程度的变化采用 ADOS 校准严重程度评分(CSS)对总分、社会情感(SA)和限制性重复行为(RRB)进行调查。结果突出显示了四种不同的模式:严重程度稳定在高、稳定在低、增加和减少。半数样本的 ADOS CSS 总分发生了变化,21.9% 的儿童 ASD 严重程度有所上升,29.1% 的儿童有所下降。另一半样本的 ADOS CSS 总分保持稳定,要么偏高(34.4%),要么偏低(14.6%)。虽然之前的大多数研究都报告了 ASD 严重程度的稳定性,但我们的研究结果显示,SA 症状经常出现改善,而 RRB 症状则保持稳定或恶化,因此存在很大的差异。我们的研究结果还显示,自闭症症状的改善与年龄最小的群体和早期诊断有关。然而,临床或社会人口因素都与 RRB 的变化无关,这强调了针对 RRB 治疗的必要性。正在进行的ELENA队列研究的第三个六年随访点将描绘出自闭症症状严重程度及其潜在风险因素的长期轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiosyncratic pupil regulation in autistic children. Resilience and strengths in the Black autism community in the United States: A scoping review. Comparative effectiveness trial: Modular behavior approach for young autistic children compared to comprehensive behavioral intervention. Cultivating the imagination: Caregiver input during pretend play with toddlers at elevated likelihood for autism. Eye-tracking training improves visuospatial working memory of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1