Samantha M. Margherio , Sean Morse , George J. DuPaul , Steven W. Evans
{"title":"Effects on alcohol and substance use of a school-based training intervention for adolescents with ADHD","authors":"Samantha M. Margherio , Sean Morse , George J. DuPaul , Steven W. Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may be at risk for early, escalating patterns of alcohol and substance use via academic, peer, and familial impairment. Existing school-based interventions for youth with ADHD effectively target these risk factors, yet their effects on alcohol and substance use have not been explored. We examined the immediate and long-term alcohol and substance use outcomes of an evidence-based school-based intervention for adolescents with ADHD.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A total of 186 (<em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 15, 79% boys, 78% White, 11% Hispanic) adolescents with ADHD were randomized to either a school-based training intervention targeting academic and social skills or a treatment-as-usual control group. A subset of youth was followed into emerging adulthood (5 year follow-up; <em>n</em> = 73). Participants reported on their alcohol and substance use behaviors and problems at post-treatment, 6-month follow-up, and 5-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two-part hurdle models controlling for prior use and demographics indicated treatment was associated with improvements in substance use outcomes among youth using any substances at 6-month follow-up (<em>β</em> = −0.45). However, among youth reporting any alcohol use at the 5-year follow-up, treatment was associated with worse alcohol use problems relative to the control condition (<em>β</em> = 0.27). Approximately 22% of intervention participants met criteria for risky drinking behavior compared to 5% of participants in the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found mixed evidence that a school-based intervention associated with positive outcomes on academic, social, and emotional functioning for adolescents with ADHD also prevented adverse alcohol and substance use outcomes. These unexpected results serve as a call for extended follow-up periods to identify the durability of intervention benefits and potential for downstream iatrogenic effects. Additional research is needed to identify school-based intervention strategies that can effectively deter substance use risk among select populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 209523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may be at risk for early, escalating patterns of alcohol and substance use via academic, peer, and familial impairment. Existing school-based interventions for youth with ADHD effectively target these risk factors, yet their effects on alcohol and substance use have not been explored. We examined the immediate and long-term alcohol and substance use outcomes of an evidence-based school-based intervention for adolescents with ADHD.
Method
A total of 186 (Mage = 15, 79% boys, 78% White, 11% Hispanic) adolescents with ADHD were randomized to either a school-based training intervention targeting academic and social skills or a treatment-as-usual control group. A subset of youth was followed into emerging adulthood (5 year follow-up; n = 73). Participants reported on their alcohol and substance use behaviors and problems at post-treatment, 6-month follow-up, and 5-year follow-up.
Results
Two-part hurdle models controlling for prior use and demographics indicated treatment was associated with improvements in substance use outcomes among youth using any substances at 6-month follow-up (β = −0.45). However, among youth reporting any alcohol use at the 5-year follow-up, treatment was associated with worse alcohol use problems relative to the control condition (β = 0.27). Approximately 22% of intervention participants met criteria for risky drinking behavior compared to 5% of participants in the control group.
Conclusion
We found mixed evidence that a school-based intervention associated with positive outcomes on academic, social, and emotional functioning for adolescents with ADHD also prevented adverse alcohol and substance use outcomes. These unexpected results serve as a call for extended follow-up periods to identify the durability of intervention benefits and potential for downstream iatrogenic effects. Additional research is needed to identify school-based intervention strategies that can effectively deter substance use risk among select populations.