Diagnosing myocardial ischemia of obstructive coronary artery disease using dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: optimization of relative myocardial blood flow ratio.

IF 1.5 The international journal of cardiovascular imaging Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1007/s10554-024-03254-0
Weifang Kong, Bingzhu Long, Fang Li, Lan Shang, Xinyue Chen, Aamer Chughtai
{"title":"Diagnosing myocardial ischemia of obstructive coronary artery disease using dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: optimization of relative myocardial blood flow ratio.","authors":"Weifang Kong, Bingzhu Long, Fang Li, Lan Shang, Xinyue Chen, Aamer Chughtai","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03254-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic efficacy of different relative myocardial blood flow (MBF) ratios in computed tomography perfusion (CTP) for myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2020 and March 2024, patients with suspected or known obstructive CAD who underwent CTP + coronary computed tomography angiography and invasive coronary angiography/fractional flow reserve were retrospectively selected. Patients and vessels were categorized into ischemia and non-ischemia groups. The diagnostic efficacies of the three relative MBF ratios were compared in patients with obstructive CAD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 48 patients (144 vessels). Notably, 34 of the 48 patients (70.83%) and 49 of the 144 vessels (34.03%) were considered to have myocardial ischemia. The area under the curve of Ratio-hi (0.944, 95% confidence interval: 0.893-0.976) was higher than those of Ratio-av, Ratio-Q3, and MBF-lowest; However, no statistical differences were found (P>0.005). The cutoff value for detecting Ratio-hi was 0.667, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 91.8%, 83.2%, 75%, 95.24%, and 86.81%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relative MBF ratios, especially Ratio-hi, demonstrated excellent performance and exhibited greater robustness in diagnosing myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"2481-2490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03254-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of different relative myocardial blood flow (MBF) ratios in computed tomography perfusion (CTP) for myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: Between October 2020 and March 2024, patients with suspected or known obstructive CAD who underwent CTP + coronary computed tomography angiography and invasive coronary angiography/fractional flow reserve were retrospectively selected. Patients and vessels were categorized into ischemia and non-ischemia groups. The diagnostic efficacies of the three relative MBF ratios were compared in patients with obstructive CAD.

Results: This study included 48 patients (144 vessels). Notably, 34 of the 48 patients (70.83%) and 49 of the 144 vessels (34.03%) were considered to have myocardial ischemia. The area under the curve of Ratio-hi (0.944, 95% confidence interval: 0.893-0.976) was higher than those of Ratio-av, Ratio-Q3, and MBF-lowest; However, no statistical differences were found (P>0.005). The cutoff value for detecting Ratio-hi was 0.667, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 91.8%, 83.2%, 75%, 95.24%, and 86.81%, respectively.

Conclusion: Relative MBF ratios, especially Ratio-hi, demonstrated excellent performance and exhibited greater robustness in diagnosing myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive CAD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用动态计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像诊断阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的心肌缺血:优化相对心肌血流比率。
目的:比较计算机断层扫描灌注(CTP)中不同相对心肌血流(MBF)比率对阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者心肌缺血的诊断效果:2020年10月至2024年3月期间,回顾性选取了接受CTP+冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术和有创冠状动脉造影术/分数血流储备的疑似或已知阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者。患者和血管被分为缺血组和非缺血组。比较了三种相对 MBF 比率对阻塞性 CAD 患者的诊断效果:这项研究包括 48 名患者(144 条血管)。值得注意的是,48 位患者中有 34 位(70.83%)和 144 根血管中有 49 根(34.03%)被认为患有心肌缺血。Ratio-hi 的曲线下面积(0.944,95% 置信区间:0.893-0.976)高于 Ratio-av、Ratio-Q3 和 MBF-lowest 的曲线下面积,但没有发现统计学差异(P>0.005)。检测 Ratio-hi 的临界值为 0.667,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性分别为 91.8%、83.2%、75%、95.24% 和 86.81%:相对 MBF 比值,尤其是 Ratio-hi,在诊断阻塞性 CAD 患者的心肌缺血方面表现出色,且更稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostic impact of myocardial bridge on long-term mortality and morbidity: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Elevated filling pressures but rare restrictive physiology in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: genotype-specific patterns and the role of left atrial strain. Infective endocarditis treated surgically: correlation between imaging, and surgical findings. Cutting-edge cardiovascular CT: advancing quantitative and translational cardiac imaging. Correction: Characteristics and prognostic value of "Ring-Like" late gadolinium enhancement - A systematic review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1