Radiation dose to the eye of physicians during radio frequency catheter ablation: a small-scale study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Irish Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1007/s11845-024-03802-6
Yoshiaki Morishima, Koichi Chida, Hiroo Chiba, Koji Kumagai
{"title":"Radiation dose to the eye of physicians during radio frequency catheter ablation: a small-scale study.","authors":"Yoshiaki Morishima, Koichi Chida, Hiroo Chiba, Koji Kumagai","doi":"10.1007/s11845-024-03802-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radio frequency catheter ablation (RFCA), a treatment for arrhythmia, requires a long fluoroscopy time that increases the radiation exposure dose to the physician, particularly to the lens of the eye. It is recommended that a lens-specific dosimeter such as DOSIRIS® is used to measure the dose to the lens.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>In this study, we investigated whether conventional glass badges can be used as an alternative to lens dosimeters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The doses to the lenses of two physicians (physician A, main operator; physician B, assistant; physician B was further away from the patient than physician A) were measured for 126 RFCA procedures performed over a 6-month period (fluoroscopy rate of 3.0 p/s with use of a ceiling-hanging shield).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative value measured by a lens dosimeter attached to the inside of Pb glasses (0.07-mm dose equivalent) next to the left eye was 4.7 mSv for physician A, and 0.8 mSv for physician B. The reading on the glass badge worn on the left side of the neck was 4.7 mSv for physician A and 1.3 mSv for physician B. Lens dosimeter and glass badge values showed a good correlation for the left eye and left neck (r = 0.86, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We show that glass badges may be a viable alternative to lens-equivalent dosimetry when using low-pulse fluoroscopy and a ceiling-hanging shield.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"2745-2751"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03802-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radio frequency catheter ablation (RFCA), a treatment for arrhythmia, requires a long fluoroscopy time that increases the radiation exposure dose to the physician, particularly to the lens of the eye. It is recommended that a lens-specific dosimeter such as DOSIRIS® is used to measure the dose to the lens.

Aims: In this study, we investigated whether conventional glass badges can be used as an alternative to lens dosimeters.

Methods: The doses to the lenses of two physicians (physician A, main operator; physician B, assistant; physician B was further away from the patient than physician A) were measured for 126 RFCA procedures performed over a 6-month period (fluoroscopy rate of 3.0 p/s with use of a ceiling-hanging shield).

Results: The cumulative value measured by a lens dosimeter attached to the inside of Pb glasses (0.07-mm dose equivalent) next to the left eye was 4.7 mSv for physician A, and 0.8 mSv for physician B. The reading on the glass badge worn on the left side of the neck was 4.7 mSv for physician A and 1.3 mSv for physician B. Lens dosimeter and glass badge values showed a good correlation for the left eye and left neck (r = 0.86, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: We show that glass badges may be a viable alternative to lens-equivalent dosimetry when using low-pulse fluoroscopy and a ceiling-hanging shield.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射频导管消融过程中医生眼睛受到的辐射剂量:一项小规模研究。
背景:射频导管消融术(RFCA)是一种治疗心律失常的方法,需要较长的透视时间,这增加了医生的辐射暴露剂量,尤其是眼睛晶状体的剂量。建议使用透镜专用剂量计(如 DOSIRIS®)来测量透镜所受剂量:方法:测量了两名医生(医生 A,主要操作者;医生 B,助手;医生 B 比医生 A 离患者更远)在 6 个月内完成的 126 例 RFCA 手术的镜片剂量(使用悬挂在天花板上的防护罩,透视率为 3.0 p/s):医生 A 和医生 B 左眼旁的铅眼镜内侧(0.07 毫米剂量当量)镜片剂量计测得的累积值分别为 4.7 mSv 和 0.8 mSv;医生 A 和医生 B 左颈部佩戴的玻璃徽章读数分别为 4.7 mSv 和 1.3 mSv:我们的研究表明,在使用低脉冲透视和天花板悬挂式防护罩时,玻璃徽章可能是透镜等效剂量测定的可行替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
期刊最新文献
Serum FoxO1 and SIRT2 concentrations in healthy pregnant women and complicated by preeclampsia. The role of clinical pharmacist in the management of resistant hypertension. Ultrasound-guided vs. laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gender disparities in extreme psychological distress at cancer diagnosis and patients access to psycho-oncological care. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical and pathologic stages of patients diagnosed with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1