Incremental prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose myocardial ischemic memory imaging for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with suspected unstable angina.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.102051
Feifei Zhang, Xiaoyu Yang, Yongjun Chen, Xiaoliang Shao, Jianfeng Wang, Sheng Zhang, Guiliang Shi, Minfu Yang, Zhifang Wu, Sijin Li, Yuetao Wang
{"title":"Incremental prognostic value of <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose myocardial ischemic memory imaging for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with suspected unstable angina.","authors":"Feifei Zhang, Xiaoyu Yang, Yongjun Chen, Xiaoliang Shao, Jianfeng Wang, Sheng Zhang, Guiliang Shi, Minfu Yang, Zhifang Wu, Sijin Li, Yuetao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.102051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The additional prognostic value of <sup>18F-flurodeoxyglucose</sup> positron emission tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET) myocardial ischemic memory imaging for patients with suspected unstable angina (UA) is not well established. This study aimed to determine whether <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET imaging provides incremental prognostic information for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) compared to clinical risk factors, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in patients with suspected UA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post hoc analysis of a prospective study, 265 patients suspected with UA (62.3% male, mean age: 65.0±9.4 years) were enrolled. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG positivity was defined as focal or focal on diffuse uptake patterns. MACEs included cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, rehospitalization for UA, and stroke. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of MACEs, and the incremental prognostic value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET imaging was assessed using the Concordance Index (C-index), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 25 months, 51 patients (19.2%) experienced MACEs. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG positivity (hazard ratio [HR]=3.220, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.630-6.360, P<.001), as well as <sup>18</sup>F-FDG standardized uptake ratio (HR=1.330, 95% CI: 1.131-1.564, P=.0006) and Extent (HR=1.045, 95% CI: 1.028-1.062, P<.0001), were independent predictors of MACE. The addition of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET imaging significantly improved risk stratification beyond clinical factors, the GRACE score, and CACS, with improved C-index (.769 vs .688, P=.045), NRI (.324, P=.020), and IDI (.055, P=.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET myocardial ischemic memory imaging significantly improves prognostic assessment for patients with suspected UA, providing valuable additional risk stratification beyond clinical risk factors, GRACE score, and CACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"102051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.102051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The additional prognostic value of 18F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) myocardial ischemic memory imaging for patients with suspected unstable angina (UA) is not well established. This study aimed to determine whether 18F-FDG PET imaging provides incremental prognostic information for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) compared to clinical risk factors, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in patients with suspected UA.

Methods: In this post hoc analysis of a prospective study, 265 patients suspected with UA (62.3% male, mean age: 65.0±9.4 years) were enrolled. 18F-FDG positivity was defined as focal or focal on diffuse uptake patterns. MACEs included cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, rehospitalization for UA, and stroke. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of MACEs, and the incremental prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET imaging was assessed using the Concordance Index (C-index), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results: Over a median follow-up of 25 months, 51 patients (19.2%) experienced MACEs. 18F-FDG positivity (hazard ratio [HR]=3.220, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.630-6.360, P<.001), as well as 18F-FDG standardized uptake ratio (HR=1.330, 95% CI: 1.131-1.564, P=.0006) and Extent (HR=1.045, 95% CI: 1.028-1.062, P<.0001), were independent predictors of MACE. The addition of 18F-FDG PET imaging significantly improved risk stratification beyond clinical factors, the GRACE score, and CACS, with improved C-index (.769 vs .688, P=.045), NRI (.324, P=.020), and IDI (.055, P=.027).

Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET myocardial ischemic memory imaging significantly improves prognostic assessment for patients with suspected UA, providing valuable additional risk stratification beyond clinical risk factors, GRACE score, and CACS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18F-FDG 心肌缺血记忆成像对疑似不稳定型心绞痛患者主要不良心血管事件的增量预后价值。
背景:18F-FDG PET心肌缺血记忆成像对疑似不稳定型心绞痛(UA)患者的额外预后价值尚未完全确定。本研究旨在确定与临床风险因素、GRACE 评分和冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)相比,18F-FDG PET 成像在预测疑似 UA 患者的主要心脏不良事件(MACE)方面是否提供了增量预后信息:在这项前瞻性研究的事后分析中,共纳入了 265 名疑似 UA 患者(62.3% 为男性,平均年龄为 65.0±9.4 岁)。18F-FDG阳性定义为局灶性或局灶性弥漫摄取模式。MACE 包括心血管死亡、急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭、UA 再住院和中风。采用多变量 Cox 回归确定 MACE 的预测因素,并使用 C 指数、净再分类改善(NRI)和综合辨别改善(IDI)评估 18F-FDG PET 成像的增量预后价值:结果:在中位 25 个月的随访期间,51 名患者(19.2%)发生了 MACE。18F-FDG阳性(HR=3.220,95%CI:1.630-6.360,P18F-FDG标准化摄取比(SUR)(HR=1.330,95%CI:1.131-1.564,P=0.0006)和Extent(HR=1.045,95%CI:1.028-1.062,P18F-FDG PET成像显著改善了临床因素、GRACE评分和CACS之外的风险分层,改善了C指数(0.769 vs 0.688,P=0.045)、NRI(0.324,P=0.020)和IDI(0.055,P=0.027).结论:18F-FDG PET心肌缺血记忆成像可显著改善疑似UA患者的预后评估,在临床危险因素、GRACE评分和CACS之外提供有价值的额外风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.80%
发文量
249
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology is the only journal in the world devoted to this dynamic and growing subspecialty. Physicians and technologists value the Journal not only for its peer-reviewed articles, but also for its timely discussions about the current and future role of nuclear cardiology. Original articles address all aspects of nuclear cardiology, including interpretation, diagnosis, imaging equipment, and use of radiopharmaceuticals. As the official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Journal also brings readers the latest information emerging from the Society''s task forces and publishes guidelines and position papers as they are adopted.
期刊最新文献
Quantification of metabolic activity in the evaluation of cardiac sarcoidosis. Assessing the Effect of Repeat PET Imaging on Treatment Response and Cardiovascular Outcomes among a Homogenously Treated Cohort of Patients with Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis. Correlation between Technetium-99m pyrophosphate myocardial uptake and extracellular volume on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Prognostic value of Transient Ischemic Dilation on Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Cardiac PET and CMR in Diagnosis of Epi-pericardial Fat Necrosis Associated with Severe Refractory Chest Pain Following Arrhythmia Ablation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1