National centralization of Hirschsprung's disease in Sweden: a comparison of postoperative outcome.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Surgery International Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1007/s00383-024-05842-6
Linnea Söderström, Christina Graneli, Daniel Rossi, Kristine Hagelsteen, Anna Gunnarsdottir, Jenny Oddsberg, Pär-Johan Svensson, Helena Borg, Matilda Bräutigam, Elisabet Gustafson, Anna Löf Granström, Pernilla Stenström, Tomas Wester
{"title":"National centralization of Hirschsprung's disease in Sweden: a comparison of postoperative outcome.","authors":"Linnea Söderström, Christina Graneli, Daniel Rossi, Kristine Hagelsteen, Anna Gunnarsdottir, Jenny Oddsberg, Pär-Johan Svensson, Helena Borg, Matilda Bräutigam, Elisabet Gustafson, Anna Löf Granström, Pernilla Stenström, Tomas Wester","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05842-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Sweden, surgical treatment of Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR) was centralized from four to two pediatric surgery centers 1st of July 2018. In adults, centralization of surgical care for complex or rare diseases seems to improve quality of care. There is little evidence supporting centralization of pediatric surgical care. The aim of this study was to assess surgical management and postoperative outcome in HSCR patients following centralization of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed data of patients with HSCR that had undergone pull-through at a pediatric surgery center in Sweden from 1st of July 2013 to 30th of June 2023. Patients managed from 1st of July 2013 to 30th of June 2018 (before centralization) were compared with patients managed from 1st of July 2018 to 30th of June 2023 (after centralization) regarding surgical treatment, unplanned procedures under general anesthesia or readmissions up to 90 days after pull-through as well as complications classified according to Clavien-Madadi up to 30 days after pull-through.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 5-year period prior to centralization, 114 individuals from 4 treating centers were included and compared to 83 patients from 2 treating centers in the second period. There was no difference regarding age at pull-through or proportion of patients with a stoma prior to pull-through. An increase of laparoscopically assisted endorectal pull-through (8.8% to 39.8%) was observed (p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen in postoperative hospital stay, unplanned procedures under general anesthesia, or readmissions up to 90 days after pull-through. There was no difference in severe complications (Clavien-Madadi ≥ 3); however, HAEC treated with antibiotics increased following centralization (10.5-24.1%; p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Centralization of care for HSCR does not seem to delay time to pull-through nor reduce severe complications, unplanned procedures under general anesthesia or readmissions up to 90 days after pull-through. The increased HAEC rate may be due to increased awareness of mild HAEC.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong> Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"40 1","pages":"265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05842-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Sweden, surgical treatment of Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR) was centralized from four to two pediatric surgery centers 1st of July 2018. In adults, centralization of surgical care for complex or rare diseases seems to improve quality of care. There is little evidence supporting centralization of pediatric surgical care. The aim of this study was to assess surgical management and postoperative outcome in HSCR patients following centralization of care.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data of patients with HSCR that had undergone pull-through at a pediatric surgery center in Sweden from 1st of July 2013 to 30th of June 2023. Patients managed from 1st of July 2013 to 30th of June 2018 (before centralization) were compared with patients managed from 1st of July 2018 to 30th of June 2023 (after centralization) regarding surgical treatment, unplanned procedures under general anesthesia or readmissions up to 90 days after pull-through as well as complications classified according to Clavien-Madadi up to 30 days after pull-through.

Results: In the 5-year period prior to centralization, 114 individuals from 4 treating centers were included and compared to 83 patients from 2 treating centers in the second period. There was no difference regarding age at pull-through or proportion of patients with a stoma prior to pull-through. An increase of laparoscopically assisted endorectal pull-through (8.8% to 39.8%) was observed (p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen in postoperative hospital stay, unplanned procedures under general anesthesia, or readmissions up to 90 days after pull-through. There was no difference in severe complications (Clavien-Madadi ≥ 3); however, HAEC treated with antibiotics increased following centralization (10.5-24.1%; p = 0.018).

Conclusion: Centralization of care for HSCR does not seem to delay time to pull-through nor reduce severe complications, unplanned procedures under general anesthesia or readmissions up to 90 days after pull-through. The increased HAEC rate may be due to increased awareness of mild HAEC.

Level of evidence:  Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典赫氏胃肠病的全国集中治疗:术后效果比较。
背景:在瑞典,赫氏胃肠病(HSCR)的手术治疗从 2018 年 7 月 1 日开始从四个儿科手术中心集中到两个。在成人中,集中手术治疗复杂或罕见疾病似乎可以提高医疗质量。支持儿科手术护理集中化的证据很少。本研究旨在评估集中护理后 HSCR 患者的手术管理和术后效果:本研究回顾性分析了2013年7月1日至2023年6月30日期间在瑞典一家儿科外科中心接受拉通手术的HSCR患者的数据。将2013年7月1日至2018年6月30日(集中管理前)接受治疗的患者与2018年7月1日至2023年6月30日(集中管理后)接受治疗的患者在手术治疗、全身麻醉下的计划外手术或拔管后90天内的再入院以及拔管后30天内根据Clavien-Madadi分类的并发症等方面进行比较:在集中管理前的 5 年中,共有来自 4 个治疗中心的 114 名患者接受了集中管理,而在集中管理后的 5 年中,共有来自 2 个治疗中心的 83 名患者接受了集中管理。拔管时的年龄和拔管前有造口的患者比例没有差异。观察到腹腔镜辅助肛门直肠内引流术的比例有所上升(8.8% 升至 39.8%)(p 结论:腹腔镜辅助肛门直肠内引流术的比例有所上升(8.8% 升至 39.8%):对 HSCR 进行集中护理似乎并不能延迟穿刺时间,也不能减少严重并发症、全身麻醉下的意外手术或穿刺后 90 天内的再入院率。HAEC 发生率增加的原因可能是对轻度 HAEC 的认识有所提高: 证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of the current available literature on the intersection between the climate crisis and paediatric surgical care. Omphalocele prevalence and co-occurring malformations: a nationwide register-based study of Danish live births in 1997-2021. Total colonic aganglionosis: management and long-term outcomes at a referral centre. Effectiveness of primary repair for low anorectal malformations in Uganda. Enteric neural stem cell neurogenesis by glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor in experimental Hirschsprung's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1