Antifibrotics in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease - real-world data from a nationwide cohort.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY ARP Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.63032/POPM9413
Ana Catarina Duarte, Carlos Marques Gomes, Margarida Correia, Beatriz Mendes, Carolina Mazeda, Francisca Guimarães, Joana Abelha-Aleixo, Miguel Guerra, Roberto Pereira da Costa, Tiago Meirinhos, Maria José Santos
{"title":"Antifibrotics in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease - real-world data from a nationwide cohort.","authors":"Ana Catarina Duarte, Carlos Marques Gomes, Margarida Correia, Beatriz Mendes, Carolina Mazeda, Francisca Guimarães, Joana Abelha-Aleixo, Miguel Guerra, Roberto Pereira da Costa, Tiago Meirinhos, Maria José Santos","doi":"10.63032/POPM9413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common pulmonary manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is associated with an increased mortality. Clinical trials have shown that antifibrotics (nintedanib and pirfenidone) can slow the progression of connective tissue disease-associated ILD. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in a national, real-world cohort of patients with RA-ILD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted an observational multicenter study of RA-ILD patients treated with antifibrotics, who were prospectively followed in Reuma.pt. Demographic and clinical data, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) results and adverse events (AEs) were collected. A linear mixed model with random intercept was used to compare PFT results within 12 (±6) months before to 12 (±6) months after antifibrotic initiation. Drug persistence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 40 RA-ILD patients, 27 (67.5%) initially treated with nintedanib and 13 (32.5%) with pirfenidone. Most of the patients were female (55%), and current or past smokers (52.5%). At antifibrotic initiation, mean age was 70.9 ± 7.1 years and median ILD duration 5.0 [IQR 2.3-7.5] years. A total of 20 patients were included in effectiveness analysis, with the use of antifibrotics interrupting the decline of forced vital capacity (FVC; decline 300 ± 500 mL in the year before antifibrotic initiation vs. improvement of 200 ± 400 mL in the year following antifibrotic initiation, p=0.336) and total lung capacity (TLC; decline 800 ± 300 mL in the year before antifibrotic initiation vs. improvement of 600 ± 900 mL in the year following antifibrotic initiation, p=0.147). However, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide remained in decline (3% decline in the year before antifibrotic initiation vs. 2.9% decline in the year following antifibrotic initiation, p=0.75). AEs were reported in 16 (40%) patients and led to drug discontinuation in 12 (30%). Median duration of drug persistence was 150.3 weeks (95 %CI 11.0-289.6), with no difference between nintedanib and pirfenidone (p = 0.976).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study with real-world data corroborates the usefulness of antifibrotics in stabilizing lung function, based on FVC and TLC. However, AEs were frequently reported and were the main cause for drug discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":29669,"journal":{"name":"ARP Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARP Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.63032/POPM9413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common pulmonary manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is associated with an increased mortality. Clinical trials have shown that antifibrotics (nintedanib and pirfenidone) can slow the progression of connective tissue disease-associated ILD. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in a national, real-world cohort of patients with RA-ILD.

Material and methods: We conducted an observational multicenter study of RA-ILD patients treated with antifibrotics, who were prospectively followed in Reuma.pt. Demographic and clinical data, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) results and adverse events (AEs) were collected. A linear mixed model with random intercept was used to compare PFT results within 12 (±6) months before to 12 (±6) months after antifibrotic initiation. Drug persistence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results: We included 40 RA-ILD patients, 27 (67.5%) initially treated with nintedanib and 13 (32.5%) with pirfenidone. Most of the patients were female (55%), and current or past smokers (52.5%). At antifibrotic initiation, mean age was 70.9 ± 7.1 years and median ILD duration 5.0 [IQR 2.3-7.5] years. A total of 20 patients were included in effectiveness analysis, with the use of antifibrotics interrupting the decline of forced vital capacity (FVC; decline 300 ± 500 mL in the year before antifibrotic initiation vs. improvement of 200 ± 400 mL in the year following antifibrotic initiation, p=0.336) and total lung capacity (TLC; decline 800 ± 300 mL in the year before antifibrotic initiation vs. improvement of 600 ± 900 mL in the year following antifibrotic initiation, p=0.147). However, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide remained in decline (3% decline in the year before antifibrotic initiation vs. 2.9% decline in the year following antifibrotic initiation, p=0.75). AEs were reported in 16 (40%) patients and led to drug discontinuation in 12 (30%). Median duration of drug persistence was 150.3 weeks (95 %CI 11.0-289.6), with no difference between nintedanib and pirfenidone (p = 0.976).

Conclusion: This study with real-world data corroborates the usefulness of antifibrotics in stabilizing lung function, based on FVC and TLC. However, AEs were frequently reported and were the main cause for drug discontinuation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿性关节炎相关间质性肺病中的抗纤维化药物--来自全国性队列的真实数据。
导言:间质性肺病(ILD)是类风湿性关节炎(RA)最常见的肺部表现,与死亡率升高有关。临床试验表明,抗纤维化药物(宁替丹尼和吡非尼酮)可延缓结缔组织病相关 ILD 的进展。本研究旨在评估抗纤维化药物在全国性、真实世界的 RA-ILD 患者队列中的有效性和耐受性:我们对接受抗纤维化药物治疗的 RA-ILD 患者进行了一项多中心观察性研究,这些患者在 Reuma.pt 接受了前瞻性随访。研究收集了人口统计学和临床数据、肺功能检查(PFTs)结果和不良事件(AEs)。采用带随机截距的线性混合模型,比较抗纤维化药物开始使用前12(±6)个月和开始使用后12(±6)个月内的PFT结果。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线评估药物的持续性:我们共纳入了40例RA-ILD患者,其中27例(67.5%)最初接受了宁替尼治疗,13例(32.5%)接受了吡非尼酮治疗。大多数患者为女性(55%),目前或曾经吸烟(52.5%)。开始接受抗纤维化治疗时的平均年龄为 70.9 ± 7.1 岁,中位 ILD 病程为 5.0 [IQR 2.3-7.5] 年。共有20名患者被纳入有效性分析,抗纤维化药物的使用阻断了用力肺活量(FVC;开始抗纤维化前一年下降300±500 mL,开始抗纤维化后一年改善200±400 mL,P=0.336)和总肺活量(TLC;开始抗纤维化前一年下降800±300 mL,开始抗纤维化后一年改善600±900 mL,P=0.147)的下降。然而,一氧化碳的扩散能力仍在下降(开始抗纤维化治疗前一年下降 3%,开始抗纤维化治疗后一年下降 2.9%,P=0.75)。16名患者(40%)出现了不良反应,12名患者(30%)因此停药。中位持续用药时间为150.3周(95 %CI 11.0-289.6),宁替达尼与吡非尼酮之间无差异(p=0.976):本研究通过真实世界的数据证实了抗纤维化药物在稳定肺功能方面的作用(基于 FVC 和 TLC)。结论:这项研究通过真实世界的数据证实了抗纤维化药物在稳定肺功能方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kikuchi-Fujimoto - an enigmatic and rare disease: a report of 3 cases and brief review of the literature. Systematic literature review to inform the Portuguese recommendations for the management of Raynaud's phenomenon and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis and other connective tissue diseases. Lessons learnt from the recent recommendations for the non-pharmacological management of systemic sclerosis. Predictors of efficacy of ultrasound-guided intra-articular glucocorticoid injection in knee osteoarthritis: A prospective study. Beyond rheumatoid nodules in rheumatoid arthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1