Reproducibility of myocardial extracellular volume quantification using dual-energy computed tomography in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.

Yoshito Kadoya, Mehmet Onur Omaygenc, Benjamin Chow, Gary R Small
{"title":"Reproducibility of myocardial extracellular volume quantification using dual-energy computed tomography in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.","authors":"Yoshito Kadoya, Mehmet Onur Omaygenc, Benjamin Chow, Gary R Small","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantifying myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) using computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be useful in the evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis. However, the reproducibility of CT measurements for myocardial ECV, is not well-established in patients with proven cardiac amyloidosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective single-center study enrolled cardiac amyloidosis patients to undergo dual-energy CT for myocardial fibrosis assessment. Delayed imaging at 7 and 8 ​min post-contrast and independent evaluations by two blinded cardiologists were performed for ECV quantification using 16-segment (ECV<sub>global</sub>) and septal sampling (ECV<sub>septal</sub>). Inter- and intraobserver variability and test-retest reliability were measured using Spearman's rank correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 24 participants (median age ​= ​78, 67 ​% male), CT ECV<sub>global</sub> and ECV<sub>septal</sub> showed median values of 53.6 ​% and 49.1 ​% at 7 ​min, and 53.3 ​% and 50.1 ​% at 8 ​min, respectively. Inter- and intraobserver variability and test-retest reliability for CT ECV<sub>global</sub> (ICC ​= ​0.798, 0.912, and 0.894, respectively) and ECV<sub>septal</sub> (ICC ​= ​0.791, 0.898, and 0.852, respectively) indicated good reproducibility, with no evidence of systemic bias between observers or scans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual-energy CT-derived ECV measurements demonstrated good reproducibility in patients with proven cardiac amyloidosis, suggesting potential utility as a repeatable imaging biomarker for this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":94071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2024.09.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantifying myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) using computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be useful in the evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis. However, the reproducibility of CT measurements for myocardial ECV, is not well-established in patients with proven cardiac amyloidosis.

Methods: This prospective single-center study enrolled cardiac amyloidosis patients to undergo dual-energy CT for myocardial fibrosis assessment. Delayed imaging at 7 and 8 ​min post-contrast and independent evaluations by two blinded cardiologists were performed for ECV quantification using 16-segment (ECVglobal) and septal sampling (ECVseptal). Inter- and intraobserver variability and test-retest reliability were measured using Spearman's rank correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results: Among the 24 participants (median age ​= ​78, 67 ​% male), CT ECVglobal and ECVseptal showed median values of 53.6 ​% and 49.1 ​% at 7 ​min, and 53.3 ​% and 50.1 ​% at 8 ​min, respectively. Inter- and intraobserver variability and test-retest reliability for CT ECVglobal (ICC ​= ​0.798, 0.912, and 0.894, respectively) and ECVseptal (ICC ​= ​0.791, 0.898, and 0.852, respectively) indicated good reproducibility, with no evidence of systemic bias between observers or scans.

Conclusions: Dual-energy CT-derived ECV measurements demonstrated good reproducibility in patients with proven cardiac amyloidosis, suggesting potential utility as a repeatable imaging biomarker for this disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用双能计算机断层扫描对心脏淀粉样变性患者的心肌细胞外体积进行量化的再现性。
背景:使用计算机断层扫描(CT)量化心肌细胞外容积(ECV)已被证明有助于评估心脏淀粉样变性。然而,在已证实患有心脏淀粉样变性的患者中,CT 测量心肌细胞外容积的重现性尚未得到充分证实:这项前瞻性单中心研究招募了心脏淀粉样变性患者接受双能 CT 进行心肌纤维化评估。在对比后 7 分钟和 8 分钟进行延迟成像,并由两名双盲心脏病专家进行独立评估,使用 16 节段(ECVglobal)和室间隔取样(ECVseptal)进行心肌体积量化。使用斯皮尔曼等级相关性、布兰-阿尔特曼分析和类内相关系数(ICC)测量观察者之间和观察者内部的变异性以及测试-重复测试的可靠性:在 24 名参与者(中位年龄 = 78 岁,67% 为男性)中,7 分钟时 CT ECVglobal 和 ECVseptal 的中位值分别为 53.6% 和 49.1%,8 分钟时分别为 53.3% 和 50.1%。CT ECVglobal(ICC 分别为 0.798、0.912 和 0.894)和 ECVseptal(ICC 分别为 0.791、0.898 和 0.852)的观察者间和观察者内变异性以及测试-再测可靠性显示了良好的再现性,没有证据表明观察者或扫描之间存在系统性偏差:结论:双能 CT 导出的 ECV 测量结果在已证实患有心脏淀粉样变性的患者中显示出良好的可重复性,这表明它有可能成为该疾病的可重复成像生物标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic performance of CCTA and CTP imaging for clinically suspected in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis. Cost-effectiveness of ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector coronary CT angiography for the evaluation of stable chest pain. Association of coronary inflammation with plaque vulnerability and fractional flow reserve in coronary artery disease. Prognostic value of left ventricular mass measured on coronary computed tomography angiography. Coronary computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of significant left main coronary artery disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1