Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Prophylaxis in Pediatric Liver Transplantation (PLT): A Comparison of Strategies Across the SPLIT Consortium.

IF 8.9 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2024.09.025
Elizabeth D Knackstedt, Sarah G Anderson, Ravinder Anand, Jeff Mitchell, Ronen Arnon, Linda Book, Udeme Ekong, Scott A Elisofon, Katryn Furuya, Ryan Himes, Ajay K Jain, Nadia Ovchinsky, Shikha S Sundaram, John Bucuvalas, Lara Danziger-Isakov
{"title":"Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Prophylaxis in Pediatric Liver Transplantation (PLT): A Comparison of Strategies Across the SPLIT Consortium.","authors":"Elizabeth D Knackstedt, Sarah G Anderson, Ravinder Anand, Jeff Mitchell, Ronen Arnon, Linda Book, Udeme Ekong, Scott A Elisofon, Katryn Furuya, Ryan Himes, Ajay K Jain, Nadia Ovchinsky, Shikha S Sundaram, John Bucuvalas, Lara Danziger-Isakov","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common complication after pediatric liver transplantation (PLT), the optimal method for CMV prevention is uncertain and lacks multi-centered investigation. We compared the effectiveness of short (<120d) versus long (>180d) CMV primary antiviral prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in PLT, through a prospective cohort study of primary PLT (<18 yrs of age) recipients enrolled in the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry from 2015 to 2019 with either donor or recipient CMV seropositivity. Participants were grouped into short or long prophylaxis based on their center's practice and intended duration. 199 PLT recipients were enrolled including 112 (56.3%) short and 87 (43.7%) long prophylaxis. End-organ disease was rare and similar between groups (2.7% and 1.1%; p=0.45). CMV DNAemia and syndrome were more common in the short compared to long (26.8% v. 13.8%; p=0.03 and 18.8% v. 6.9%; p=0.02). Neutropenia occurred more commonly with long prophylaxis (55.2% vs. 16.1%; p<0.001). Graft and patient survival were similar. Consideration of a short prophylaxis must weigh increased risk of CMV syndrome/DNAemia against medication burden and neutropenia of longer prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.09.025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common complication after pediatric liver transplantation (PLT), the optimal method for CMV prevention is uncertain and lacks multi-centered investigation. We compared the effectiveness of short (<120d) versus long (>180d) CMV primary antiviral prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in PLT, through a prospective cohort study of primary PLT (<18 yrs of age) recipients enrolled in the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry from 2015 to 2019 with either donor or recipient CMV seropositivity. Participants were grouped into short or long prophylaxis based on their center's practice and intended duration. 199 PLT recipients were enrolled including 112 (56.3%) short and 87 (43.7%) long prophylaxis. End-organ disease was rare and similar between groups (2.7% and 1.1%; p=0.45). CMV DNAemia and syndrome were more common in the short compared to long (26.8% v. 13.8%; p=0.03 and 18.8% v. 6.9%; p=0.02). Neutropenia occurred more commonly with long prophylaxis (55.2% vs. 16.1%; p<0.001). Graft and patient survival were similar. Consideration of a short prophylaxis must weigh increased risk of CMV syndrome/DNAemia against medication burden and neutropenia of longer prophylaxis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿肝移植 (PLT) 中的巨细胞病毒 (CMV) 预防:SPLIT联盟的策略比较。
虽然巨细胞病毒(CMV)是小儿肝移植(PLT)后的常见并发症,但预防CMV的最佳方法尚不确定,也缺乏多中心调查。我们通过一项前瞻性队列研究比较了短期(180 天)CMV 初级抗病毒预防对预防小儿肝移植中 CMV 疾病的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
期刊最新文献
The Ability of An Electronic Nose To Distinguish Between Complications In Lung Transplant Recipients. Delivery of butyrate to the lower gut by polymeric micelles prolongs survival of distal skin allografts. Simultaneous En-bloc Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation (SEBKP) from Pediatric Donors: Selection, Surgical Strategy, Management and Outcomes. A novel intravascular bioartificial pancreas device shows safety and islet functionality over thirty days in non-diabetic swine. Liver transplantation and bariatric surgery: is sleeve gastrectomy really the panacea?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1