Over-the-counter analgesic usage: associations with attentional biases in young women.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000795
Elise Solbu Roalsø, Sandra Klonteig, Brage Kraft, Siv Skarstein, Eva Hilland, Peyman Mirtaheri, Marianne Aalberg, Rune Jonassen
{"title":"Over-the-counter analgesic usage: associations with attentional biases in young women.","authors":"Elise Solbu Roalsø, Sandra Klonteig, Brage Kraft, Siv Skarstein, Eva Hilland, Peyman Mirtaheri, Marianne Aalberg, Rune Jonassen","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of over-the-counter analgesics (OTCA) has been found to alter various aspects of emotional processing and has been linked to increased anxiety and depression symptoms. Attentional bias is an aspect of emotional processing that is closely related to anxiety and depression. Although OTCA and attentional bias have both been linked to anxiety and depression, the potential links between OTCA usage and attentional bias are not yet investigated. The present study aimed to determine whether the frequency of OTCA usage is associated with differences in attentional bias by comparing response-based measures of attentional bias in 62 women aged 19-30 years. The findings showed that the small group reporting high OTCA usage demonstrated more orientation avoidance to fearful stimuli than those reporting no or low usage. Based on these preliminary findings, further research on attentional bias and its relationship to high OTCA usage is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"453-459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of over-the-counter analgesics (OTCA) has been found to alter various aspects of emotional processing and has been linked to increased anxiety and depression symptoms. Attentional bias is an aspect of emotional processing that is closely related to anxiety and depression. Although OTCA and attentional bias have both been linked to anxiety and depression, the potential links between OTCA usage and attentional bias are not yet investigated. The present study aimed to determine whether the frequency of OTCA usage is associated with differences in attentional bias by comparing response-based measures of attentional bias in 62 women aged 19-30 years. The findings showed that the small group reporting high OTCA usage demonstrated more orientation avoidance to fearful stimuli than those reporting no or low usage. Based on these preliminary findings, further research on attentional bias and its relationship to high OTCA usage is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用非处方镇痛药:与年轻女性的注意偏差有关。
研究发现,使用非处方止痛药(OTCA)会改变情绪处理的各个方面,并与焦虑和抑郁症状的增加有关。注意偏差是情绪处理的一个方面,与焦虑和抑郁密切相关。虽然 OTCA 和注意偏差都与焦虑和抑郁有关,但尚未研究 OTCA 的使用与注意偏差之间的潜在联系。本研究旨在通过比较 62 名 19-30 岁女性基于反应的注意力偏差测量方法,确定使用非处方药的频率是否与注意力偏差的差异有关。研究结果表明,与不使用或少使用 OTCA 的人群相比,使用 OTCA 频率高的人群对恐惧刺激表现出更多的定向回避。基于这些初步研究结果,建议进一步研究注意偏差及其与大量使用 OTCA 的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Pharmacology
Behavioural Pharmacology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.
期刊最新文献
Norharmane potentiated anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like responses induced by imipramine and citalopram: an isobologram analysis. Evaluation of akathisia in patients receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Over-the-counter analgesic usage: associations with attentional biases in young women. An investigation of economic interactions between social reinforcement and heroin or cocaine in rats. The administration of a phentolamine infusion into the basolateral amygdala enhances long-term memory and diminishes anxiety-like behavior in stressed rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1