Usability evaluation and reporting for mobile health apps targeting patients with skin diseases: a systematic review.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1093/ced/llae378
Georgios Kounidas, Iona Cleer, Elinor Harriss, Rachel Harrison, Rubeta N Matin
{"title":"Usability evaluation and reporting for mobile health apps targeting patients with skin diseases: a systematic review.","authors":"Georgios Kounidas, Iona Cleer, Elinor Harriss, Rachel Harrison, Rubeta N Matin","doi":"10.1093/ced/llae378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Usability is an important method for evaluating mobile health apps from a user perspective. Yet many publicly available apps lack adequate attention to their design, development and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess usability evaluation and reporting for mobile health apps targeting patients with skin diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022347184). A search strategy combined terms for usability evaluation, user experience, skin disease and mobile health apps (search date 2012-2023). Six databases (Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus) were searched, identifying 18 052 results. Nine studies (comprising nine apps) were included in the final analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Skin conditions and issues targeted included skin cancer (n = 3); sun protection (n = 3); chronic pruritus (n = 2); cutaneous leishmaniasis (n = 1); spina bifida (n = 1); and a study of acne, psoriasis, rosacea, laser treatments, actinic damage, monitoring benign moles, alopecia and inflammatory rash. All studies assessed app usability and feasibility, with the majority concluding that the apps were deemed useful and easy to use. Qualitative methods, such as usability questionnaires and semistructured interviews, were predominantly employed. Common emerging themes included ease of use and navigation, comprehensibility, security and privacy concerns, data sharing issues, customizability, costs, and the ability to track progress or self-monitor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While smartphone apps for skin disorders show promising usability across diverse diseases, the limited literature compared with the rapid development of apps highlights the need for meticulous user-centred design and rigorous evaluation. The study emphasizes the importance of evaluating and reporting usability findings to optimize the long-term adoption of mobile health apps, particularly those targeting skin diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"387-394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llae378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Usability is an important method for evaluating mobile health apps from a user perspective. Yet many publicly available apps lack adequate attention to their design, development and evaluation.

Objectives: To assess usability evaluation and reporting for mobile health apps targeting patients with skin diseases.

Methods: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022347184). A search strategy combined terms for usability evaluation, user experience, skin disease and mobile health apps (search date 2012-2023). Six databases (Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus) were searched, identifying 18 052 results. Nine studies (comprising nine apps) were included in the final analysis.

Results: Skin conditions and issues targeted included skin cancer (n = 3); sun protection (n = 3); chronic pruritus (n = 2); cutaneous leishmaniasis (n = 1); spina bifida (n = 1); and a study of acne, psoriasis, rosacea, laser treatments, actinic damage, monitoring benign moles, alopecia and inflammatory rash. All studies assessed app usability and feasibility, with the majority concluding that the apps were deemed useful and easy to use. Qualitative methods, such as usability questionnaires and semistructured interviews, were predominantly employed. Common emerging themes included ease of use and navigation, comprehensibility, security and privacy concerns, data sharing issues, customizability, costs, and the ability to track progress or self-monitor.

Conclusions: While smartphone apps for skin disorders show promising usability across diverse diseases, the limited literature compared with the rapid development of apps highlights the need for meticulous user-centred design and rigorous evaluation. The study emphasizes the importance of evaluating and reporting usability findings to optimize the long-term adoption of mobile health apps, particularly those targeting skin diseases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对皮肤病患者的移动医疗应用程序的可用性评估和报告:系统综述。
背景:可用性是从用户角度评估移动医疗应用程序的重要方法。然而,许多公开发布的应用程序在设计、开发和评估方面缺乏足够的重视:评估针对皮肤病患者的移动医疗应用程序的可用性评估和报告:该方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42022347184)注册。搜索策略结合了可用性评估、用户体验、皮肤病和移动医疗应用程序等术语(搜索日期为 2012 年至 2023 年)。检索了六个数据库(Embase、Medline、CINAHL、Cochrane CENTRAL、Cochrane 系统性综述数据库、Scopus),共发现 18052 项结果。9项研究(包括9个应用程序)被纳入最终分析:结果:所针对的皮肤状况/问题包括皮肤癌(3 项)、防晒(3 项),以下每项均有一项研究:慢性瘙痒症/痤疮/银屑病/酒渣鼻/激光治疗/乳头状损害/良性痣监测/脱发/炎性皮疹/皮肤利什曼病/脊柱裂。所有研究都对应用程序的可用性和可行性进行了评估,大多数研究的结论都认为应用程序有用且易于使用。研究主要采用了定性方法,如可用性问卷调查和半结构化访谈。新出现的共同主题包括易用性和导航、可理解性、安全/隐私问题、数据共享问题、可定制性、成本以及跟踪进展或自我监测的能力:尽管针对不同疾病的皮肤病智能手机应用程序显示出良好的可用性,但与快速的应用程序开发相比,有限的文献资料凸显了以用户为中心进行精心设计和严格评估的必要性。这项研究强调了评估和报告可用性研究结果的重要性,以优化移动医疗应用程序的长期应用,尤其是针对皮肤病的应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (CED) is a unique provider of relevant and educational material for practising clinicians and dermatological researchers. We support continuing professional development (CPD) of dermatology specialists to advance the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease in order to improve patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Complete response of multicentric reticulohistiocytosis treated with tofacitinib. DFSP of the scalp treated with formalin-fixed Mohs Surgery; a patient's perspective. General dermatology and dermatology in primary health care. Safety of interleukin-17A inhibitors in 306 patients with psoriasis with or without latent tuberculosis: a dual-centre retrospective study in China. Struggling to Be Seen: The Journey for Support While Living with Alopecia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1