A qualitative exploration of the assessment process to cochlear implantation for children with hearing loss.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2400328
Amanda J Hall, Briony Dillon, Helen Pryce, Marette Ambler, Kate Hanvey
{"title":"A qualitative exploration of the assessment process to cochlear implantation for children with hearing loss.","authors":"Amanda J Hall, Briony Dillon, Helen Pryce, Marette Ambler, Kate Hanvey","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2400328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the process of paediatric cochlear implant assessment, from referral to implantation, from the perspective of parents, cochlear implant professionals, and through observations of clinics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative approach, using grounded theory methodology.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Twelve families with children under 5 years with permanent hearing loss referred for a cochlear implant or received an implant in the past year, and six professionals who refer or assess children for cochlear implants. Data collection involved interviews and ethnographic observations of assessment clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The core theme derived from interview and observation data related to the work of the cochlear implant assessment for families. The relationship between the work generated by the assessment process and capacity of parents to do the work provides a model to examine access to early implantation, consistent with the Burden of Treatment theory. We identified variation in terms of workload, relating to factors such as a child's additional needs or number of appointments required, and in terms of capacity, relating to factors such as social circumstances or health literacy. Social, peer and professional support and information helped families manage the workload.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings have implications for delivery of paediatric cochlear implant services.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2400328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the process of paediatric cochlear implant assessment, from referral to implantation, from the perspective of parents, cochlear implant professionals, and through observations of clinics.

Design: Qualitative approach, using grounded theory methodology.

Study sample: Twelve families with children under 5 years with permanent hearing loss referred for a cochlear implant or received an implant in the past year, and six professionals who refer or assess children for cochlear implants. Data collection involved interviews and ethnographic observations of assessment clinics.

Results: The core theme derived from interview and observation data related to the work of the cochlear implant assessment for families. The relationship between the work generated by the assessment process and capacity of parents to do the work provides a model to examine access to early implantation, consistent with the Burden of Treatment theory. We identified variation in terms of workload, relating to factors such as a child's additional needs or number of appointments required, and in terms of capacity, relating to factors such as social circumstances or health literacy. Social, peer and professional support and information helped families manage the workload.

Conclusions: Findings have implications for delivery of paediatric cochlear implant services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力损失儿童人工耳蜗植入评估过程的定性探索。
目的从家长、人工耳蜗植入专业人员的角度,并通过对诊所的观察,探讨儿科人工耳蜗植入评估从转诊到植入的过程:研究样本:研究样本:12 个有 5 岁以下永久性听力损失儿童的家庭,这些儿童被转诊为人工耳蜗植入者或在过去一年中接受了人工耳蜗植入,以及 6 名转诊或评估儿童人工耳蜗植入的专业人员。数据收集包括访谈和对评估诊所的人种学观察:从访谈和观察数据中得出的核心主题与人工耳蜗家庭评估工作有关。评估过程中产生的工作与家长完成工作的能力之间的关系为研究早期植入提供了一个模型,与 "治疗负担 "理论相一致。我们发现在工作量方面存在差异,这与儿童的额外需求或所需预约次数等因素有关;在能力方面也存在差异,这与社会环境或健康知识等因素有关。社会、同龄人和专业人员的支持以及信息有助于家庭应对工作量:研究结果对儿科人工耳蜗植入服务的提供具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
The influence of age and hearing loss on thresholds measured using the TFS-AF test. Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1