Permanent Pacing Reduces Blood Pressure in Older Patients with Drug-resistant Hypertension: A New Pacing Paradigm?

Q3 Medicine Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Pub Date : 2024-09-15 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.19102/icrm.2024.15091
Bich Lien Nguyen, Michael H Burnam, Francesco Accardo, Angela Angione, Roberto Scacciavillani, Carly Pierson, Eli S Gang
{"title":"Permanent Pacing Reduces Blood Pressure in Older Patients with Drug-resistant Hypertension: A New Pacing Paradigm?","authors":"Bich Lien Nguyen, Michael H Burnam, Francesco Accardo, Angela Angione, Roberto Scacciavillani, Carly Pierson, Eli S Gang","doi":"10.19102/icrm.2024.15091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertension (HTN) is a major contributor to cardiovascular mortality. Many patients with drug-resistant hypertension (DRH) also require permanent pacing (PP). This large retrospective study evaluated the effect of PP for conventional PP indications in older patients with DRH. We reviewed the charts of 176 patients with dual-chamber PP and DRH. The effects of PP on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (sBP and dBP), the number of HTN-related medications, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed at 6 months post-implantation and compared with pre-implantation values. Patients were followed up with for ≥72 months. Patients with a decline of >5 mmHg in sBP and decrease in at least one anti-HTN medication were defined as responders (126/176; <i>P</i> < .01). The mean decline in sBP was 9 mmHg, while that in dBP was 3 mmHg (<i>P</i> < .001 for both). Among responders, optimal reductions in sBP, dBP, and medications were seen at a stratification of >50% atrial pacing and <40% ventricular pacing (-12, -6.3, and -1.6, respectively). When right ventricular pacing of <50% was used for dichotomizing, the optimal atrial/ventricular pacing stratification was atrial pacing > 50% and ventricular pacing < 40% (-11.3, -6.3, and -1.6, respectively). A relationship between increasing atrial pacing and a decline in sBP was noted but did not reach statistical significance. However, of those responders who had a >10-mmHg decline in sBP, the majority were paced between 60%-100% in the atria. The LVEF did not change post-PP in either group. In conclusion, PP results in significant improvement in BP control. The observed association warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","volume":"15 9","pages":"6014-6021"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2024.15091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypertension (HTN) is a major contributor to cardiovascular mortality. Many patients with drug-resistant hypertension (DRH) also require permanent pacing (PP). This large retrospective study evaluated the effect of PP for conventional PP indications in older patients with DRH. We reviewed the charts of 176 patients with dual-chamber PP and DRH. The effects of PP on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (sBP and dBP), the number of HTN-related medications, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed at 6 months post-implantation and compared with pre-implantation values. Patients were followed up with for ≥72 months. Patients with a decline of >5 mmHg in sBP and decrease in at least one anti-HTN medication were defined as responders (126/176; P < .01). The mean decline in sBP was 9 mmHg, while that in dBP was 3 mmHg (P < .001 for both). Among responders, optimal reductions in sBP, dBP, and medications were seen at a stratification of >50% atrial pacing and <40% ventricular pacing (-12, -6.3, and -1.6, respectively). When right ventricular pacing of <50% was used for dichotomizing, the optimal atrial/ventricular pacing stratification was atrial pacing > 50% and ventricular pacing < 40% (-11.3, -6.3, and -1.6, respectively). A relationship between increasing atrial pacing and a decline in sBP was noted but did not reach statistical significance. However, of those responders who had a >10-mmHg decline in sBP, the majority were paced between 60%-100% in the atria. The LVEF did not change post-PP in either group. In conclusion, PP results in significant improvement in BP control. The observed association warrants further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
永久起搏可降低老年耐药高血压患者的血压:新的起搏范例?
高血压(HTN)是导致心血管死亡的主要因素。许多耐药高血压(DRH)患者也需要永久起搏(PP)。这项大型回顾性研究评估了针对 DRH 老年患者常规起搏适应症的起搏效果。我们查阅了 176 名双腔起搏器和 DRH 患者的病历。在植入后 6 个月评估了 PP 对收缩压和舒张压(sBP 和 dBP)、高血压相关药物数量和左心室射血分数(LVEF)的影响,并与植入前的数值进行了比较。对患者的随访时间≥72个月。sBP下降>5 mmHg且至少减少一种抗HTN药物的患者被定义为应答者(126/176;P < .01)。sBP 的平均降幅为 9 毫米汞柱,而 dBP 的平均降幅为 3 毫米汞柱(二者的 P < .001)。在应答者中,sBP、dBP 和药物的最佳降幅出现在心房起搏 >50% 和心室起搏 50% < 40% 的分层中(分别为-11.3、-6.3 和-1.6)。心房起搏增加与 sBP 下降之间存在一定关系,但未达到统计学意义。然而,在 sBP 下降大于 10 mmHg 的应答者中,大多数人的心房起搏在 60%-100% 之间。两组患者的 LVEF 在起搏后都没有发生变化。总之,PP 能显著改善血压控制。观察到的关联值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊最新文献
Carotid Sinus Massage During Head-up Tilt Testing Can Predict the Test Outcome: Implications for Its Use as a Screening Tool in Patients with Unexplained Syncope. Challenges to Contemporary Wide Complex Tachycardia Criteria: A Single-center Case Series of 1:1 Atrial Flutter. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Implantation of an Extravascular Implantable Defibrillator Using a Substernal Lead in a Patient with Previous Cardiac Surgery. Letter from the Editor in Chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1