Implicit associations with non-suicidal self-injury: Examination in a clinical sample by borderline personality symptomatology.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1111/bjc.12506
Stephanie Jarvi Steele, Nigel M Jaffe, Claire A Kelly, Thröstur Björgvinsson, Lance P Swenson
{"title":"Implicit associations with non-suicidal self-injury: Examination in a clinical sample by borderline personality symptomatology.","authors":"Stephanie Jarvi Steele, Nigel M Jaffe, Claire A Kelly, Thröstur Björgvinsson, Lance P Swenson","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examine correlates and predictors for implicit associations with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) with the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT) in a treatment-seeking sample. We also examine group differences in the SI-IAT among those with low/none, moderate and high/clinically significant borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptomatology in a treatment-seeking sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N = 111; 58% female; 89% White; M<sub>age</sub> = 30.25) completed the SI-IAT and self-report measures at two time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher BPD symptom scores were significantly, positively correlated with implicit identification with NSSI, and predicted NSSI identity when controlling for depression indices, history of NSSI and other covariates. With Time 1 SI-IAT scores entered as a covariate, BPD scores no longer significantly predicted Time 2 SI-IAT scores. Individuals with moderate and high/clinically significant symptom counts of BPD had higher/stronger implicit associations with NSSI identity than those with no/low BPD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with symptoms of BPD may implicitly identify with NSSI more than other clinical groups; examination of implicit assessments in BPD in future research is needed to further explore implicit identification with NSSI in this patient group to further understand both cross-sectional and prospective relations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12506","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We examine correlates and predictors for implicit associations with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) with the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT) in a treatment-seeking sample. We also examine group differences in the SI-IAT among those with low/none, moderate and high/clinically significant borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptomatology in a treatment-seeking sample.

Methods: Participants (N = 111; 58% female; 89% White; Mage = 30.25) completed the SI-IAT and self-report measures at two time points.

Results: Higher BPD symptom scores were significantly, positively correlated with implicit identification with NSSI, and predicted NSSI identity when controlling for depression indices, history of NSSI and other covariates. With Time 1 SI-IAT scores entered as a covariate, BPD scores no longer significantly predicted Time 2 SI-IAT scores. Individuals with moderate and high/clinically significant symptom counts of BPD had higher/stronger implicit associations with NSSI identity than those with no/low BPD symptoms.

Conclusions: Individuals with symptoms of BPD may implicitly identify with NSSI more than other clinical groups; examination of implicit assessments in BPD in future research is needed to further explore implicit identification with NSSI in this patient group to further understand both cross-sectional and prospective relations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非自杀性自伤的隐性关联:通过边缘型人格症状对临床样本进行检查。
研究目的:我们通过自伤内隐联想测验(SI-IAT)研究了寻求治疗样本中与非自杀性自伤(NSSI)内隐联想的相关性和预测因素。我们还研究了寻求治疗样本中低度/无、中度和高度/临床显著边缘型人格障碍(BPD)症状者在 SI-IAT 中的群体差异:参与者(N = 111;58% 女性;89% 白人;年龄 = 30.25)在两个时间点完成 SI-IAT 和自我报告测量:结果:较高的 BPD 症状得分与 NSSI 的内隐认同呈显著正相关,并且在控制抑郁指数、NSSI 史和其他协变量的情况下,预测 NSSI 认同。将第一阶段的 SI-IAT 分数作为协变量输入后,BPD 分数不再显著预测第二阶段的 SI-IAT 分数。与无BPD症状/BPD症状轻微的人相比,BPD症状中度和高度/临床症状明显的人与NSSI身份的内隐关联更高/更强:有 BPD 症状的个体可能比其他临床群体更隐性地认同 NSSI;在未来的研究中需要对 BPD 的隐性评估进行检查,以进一步探索该患者群体对 NSSI 的隐性认同,从而进一步了解横断面和前瞻性关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
期刊最新文献
More than Body Appearance! Improving body image in young women through a functionality-focused intervention combined with psychoeducation: A randomized controlled trial. A single-session feedback training modifies interpretation bias in individuals with high social anxiety: A randomized controlled trial. Trauma and social pathways to psychosis: Examining the role of attachment, social rank and dissociation in a clinical sample. Ensuring that psychological interventions are delivered as intended on mental health inpatient wards. Predicting optimal treatment allocation for cognitive analytic-guided self-help versus cognitive behavioural-guided self-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1