Time to Diagnose Endometriosis: Current Status, Challenges and Regional Characteristics-A Systematic Literature Review.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17973
Pauline De Corte, Moritz Klinghardt, Sophia von Stockum, Klaas Heinemann
{"title":"Time to Diagnose Endometriosis: Current Status, Challenges and Regional Characteristics-A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Pauline De Corte, Moritz Klinghardt, Sophia von Stockum, Klaas Heinemann","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis diagnosis reportedly faces delays of up to 10 years. Despite growing awareness and improved guidelines, information on the current status is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically assess the published evidence on the status of time to diagnosis in individuals with endometriosis, with respect to the definition of time to diagnosis, geographical location and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase were searched for publications reporting time to diagnosing endometriosis since 2018. No restrictions to population or comparators were applied. All publications were screened by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Search results were limited to primary publications of randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and observational studies. Case reports, secondary publications and grey literature were excluded. No restrictions were made regarding language, provided that an English title and abstract were available.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Publications were assessed with respect to time to diagnosis, diagnostic methods, study type, study country and potential bias.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The 17 publications eligible for inclusion in this literature review were all observational studies. The publications reported diagnosis times between 0.3 and 12 years, with variations depending on the definition of time to diagnosis (overall, primary, or clinical), geographical location and characteristics of the included study population. Evidence was of poor to good quality overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnostic delay is still present, primarily driven by physicians, and this review underscores the need for standardised definitions, increased awareness and targeted diagnostic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17973","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis diagnosis reportedly faces delays of up to 10 years. Despite growing awareness and improved guidelines, information on the current status is limited.

Objectives: To systematically assess the published evidence on the status of time to diagnosis in individuals with endometriosis, with respect to the definition of time to diagnosis, geographical location and patient characteristics.

Search strategy: MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase were searched for publications reporting time to diagnosing endometriosis since 2018. No restrictions to population or comparators were applied. All publications were screened by two independent reviewers.

Selection criteria: Search results were limited to primary publications of randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and observational studies. Case reports, secondary publications and grey literature were excluded. No restrictions were made regarding language, provided that an English title and abstract were available.

Data collection and analysis: Publications were assessed with respect to time to diagnosis, diagnostic methods, study type, study country and potential bias.

Main results: The 17 publications eligible for inclusion in this literature review were all observational studies. The publications reported diagnosis times between 0.3 and 12 years, with variations depending on the definition of time to diagnosis (overall, primary, or clinical), geographical location and characteristics of the included study population. Evidence was of poor to good quality overall.

Conclusions: Diagnostic delay is still present, primarily driven by physicians, and this review underscores the need for standardised definitions, increased awareness and targeted diagnostic interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断子宫内膜异位症的时间:现状、挑战和地区特征--系统性文献综述。
背景:据报道,子宫内膜异位症的诊断会面临长达 10 年的延误。尽管人们对子宫内膜异位症的认识在不断提高,相关指南也在不断完善,但有关其现状的信息却十分有限:系统评估已发表的有关子宫内膜异位症患者诊断时间状况的证据,包括诊断时间的定义、地理位置和患者特征:检索MEDLINE(通过PubMed)和Embase,检索2018年以来报告子宫内膜异位症诊断时间的出版物。对人群或比较对象未作限制。所有出版物均由两名独立审稿人进行筛选:搜索结果仅限于随机对照试验、非随机对照试验和观察性研究的主要出版物。病例报告、二手出版物和灰色文献均被排除在外。数据收集与分析:对出版物的诊断时间、诊断方法、研究类型、研究国家和潜在偏倚进行评估:符合纳入本次文献综述的 17 篇文献均为观察性研究。这些文献报告的诊断时间介于 0.3 年至 12 年之间,诊断时间的不同取决于诊断时间的定义(总体诊断时间、初诊诊断时间或临床诊断时间)、地理位置和纳入研究人群的特征。总体而言,证据的质量从差到好:诊断延误仍然存在,主要是由医生造成的,本综述强调了标准化定义、提高认识和有针对性的诊断干预措施的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Author Reply. Enhanced Recovery After Gynaecological Surgery: Insights and Future Directions. 'Necessity Is the Mother of Invention'-The Wider Significance of Novel Mid-Urethral Rectus Fascial Sling. Adherence to Healthy Prepregnancy Lifestyle and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study. Intra- and Postoperative Complications in 4565 vNOTES Hysterectomies: International Registry Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1