Botulinum toxin injection of the lower esophageal sphincter to identify achalasia-variant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Diseases of the Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1093/dote/doae082
Chanakyaram A Reddy, Ashton Ellison, Anh D Nguyen, Eitan Podgaetz, Rhonda F Souza, Vani J A Konda, Stuart J Spechler
{"title":"Botulinum toxin injection of the lower esophageal sphincter to identify achalasia-variant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.","authors":"Chanakyaram A Reddy, Ashton Ellison, Anh D Nguyen, Eitan Podgaetz, Rhonda F Souza, Vani J A Konda, Stuart J Spechler","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) can be an achalasia variant caused by neuromuscular dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), or the manometric manifestation of mechanical processes that impair EGJ distensibility. Distinction among these conditions has important implications for treatment, but can be difficult. We hypothesized that response to botulinum toxin (BT) injection of the LES could be a diagnostic test for identifying achalasia-variant EGJOO likely to respond to LES muscle-directed invasive therapy. We reviewed our experience with symptomatic EGJOO patients who had BT injection of the LES. Data collected include demographics, esophageal body manometry findings, esophagram evidence of retention, and symptom response at 1-6 months after BT injection categorized as poor, partial, or good. Clinical response to any subsequent LES-directed invasive treatment (EsoFLIP dilation, pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy, or POEM) also was recorded. Thirteen symptomatic EGJOO patients were included (mean age 55.9 ± 16.4 years; eight men, five women). Symptom response to BT injection was good in six (46%), partial in three (23%), and poor in three (23%); one was lost to follow-up. All five patients who received invasive treatment after partial or good response to BT had a partial or good response to invasive treatment. The one patient who had invasive treatment after a poor response to BT had a poor response to invasive treatment. These findings suggest that a good response to BT injection of the LES can identify an achalasia-variant form of EGJOO that will respond to LES muscle-directed invasive therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) can be an achalasia variant caused by neuromuscular dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), or the manometric manifestation of mechanical processes that impair EGJ distensibility. Distinction among these conditions has important implications for treatment, but can be difficult. We hypothesized that response to botulinum toxin (BT) injection of the LES could be a diagnostic test for identifying achalasia-variant EGJOO likely to respond to LES muscle-directed invasive therapy. We reviewed our experience with symptomatic EGJOO patients who had BT injection of the LES. Data collected include demographics, esophageal body manometry findings, esophagram evidence of retention, and symptom response at 1-6 months after BT injection categorized as poor, partial, or good. Clinical response to any subsequent LES-directed invasive treatment (EsoFLIP dilation, pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy, or POEM) also was recorded. Thirteen symptomatic EGJOO patients were included (mean age 55.9 ± 16.4 years; eight men, five women). Symptom response to BT injection was good in six (46%), partial in three (23%), and poor in three (23%); one was lost to follow-up. All five patients who received invasive treatment after partial or good response to BT had a partial or good response to invasive treatment. The one patient who had invasive treatment after a poor response to BT had a poor response to invasive treatment. These findings suggest that a good response to BT injection of the LES can identify an achalasia-variant form of EGJOO that will respond to LES muscle-directed invasive therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对下食管括约肌注射肉毒杆菌毒素以识别贲门失弛缓症变异型食管胃交界处流出道梗阻。
食管胃交界处流出道梗阻(EGJOO)可能是下食管括约肌(LES)神经肌肉功能障碍引起的贲门失弛缓症变异,也可能是影响食管胃交界处扩张性的机械过程的压力表表现。区分这些病症对治疗具有重要意义,但却很困难。我们假设,对 LES 注射肉毒杆菌毒素 (BT) 的反应可作为一种诊断测试,用于识别可能对 LES 肌肉导向的侵入性疗法产生反应的贲门失弛缓症变异型 EGJOO。我们回顾了对有症状的 EGJOO 患者进行 LES BT 注射的经验。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、食管体测压仪检查结果、食管造影显示潴留的证据,以及 BT 注射后 1-6 个月的症状反应(分为不良、部分不良或良好)。此外,还记录了对任何后续 LES 定向侵入性治疗(EsoFLIP 扩张术、气动扩张术、海勒肌切开术或 POEM)的临床反应。共纳入了 13 名有症状的 EGJOO 患者(平均年龄为 55.9 ± 16.4 岁;8 名男性,5 名女性)。注射 BT 后症状反应良好的有 6 人(46%),部分反应良好的有 3 人(23%),反应不佳的有 3 人(23%);其中 1 人失去了随访机会。对 BT 部分或良好反应后接受侵入性治疗的五名患者均对侵入性治疗有部分或良好反应。一名对 BT 反应不佳后接受侵入性治疗的患者对侵入性治疗的反应不佳。这些研究结果表明,对 LES 进行 BT 注射的良好反应可以确定贲门失弛缓症变异型 EGJOO,这种 EGJOO 将对 LES 肌肉导向的侵入疗法产生反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
期刊最新文献
High prevalence of esophageal motility disorders in patients with rheumatologic diseases. Sling fiber preservation during POEM reduces incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. Impacts of intestinal fermentation on gastroesophageal reflux disease: can the tail wag the dog? Central ligation or partial preservation of the right gastric artery does not seem to affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Risk factors for readmission following esophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1