A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Endodontic Irrigating Solutions on Microhardness of Root Canal Dentin: An in vitro Study.

Chris Cherian Geogi, Sandeep Dubey, Palak Singh, B Rajkumar, Praveen Singh Samant, Ananya Rawat
{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Endodontic Irrigating Solutions on Microhardness of Root Canal Dentin: An <i>in vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Chris Cherian Geogi, Sandeep Dubey, Palak Singh, B Rajkumar, Praveen Singh Samant, Ananya Rawat","doi":"10.30476/dentjods.2023.98298.2071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of the problem: </strong>During endodontic therapy, irrigation solutions applied in the root canal may affect the physicochemical properties of the dentinal wall, thereby changing its microhardness. This may adversely affect the sealing ability and adhesion of dental materials. Therefore, many studies have focused on the search for an ideal root canal irrigant that has a minimal effect on dentinal microhardness.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study was conducted to determine the changes in dentin microhardness after root canal irrigation with different endodontic irrigants.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Ninety-five freshly extracted maxillary central incisor teeth with straight single canals were selected. These teeth were sectioned transversely at the level of the cementoenamel junction. The working length of each tooth was determined, and canal space was prepared by the HyFlex CM rotary file system. During instrumentation, normal saline was used for irrigation. Then, teeth were split longitudinally into two segments. According to the irrigating solution employed, samples were divided into five groups (n=19): normal saline (Group A), 3% sodium hypochlorite (Group B), 2% chlorhexidine (Group C), 5% calcium hypochlorite (Group D), and 0.2% nanochitosan (Group E).3 mL of the corresponding irrigating solution was administered for total15 minutes in each prepared sample. The Vickers micro-hardness tester was then used to assess micro-hardness. The data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All tested irrigating solutions decreased the dentinal microhardness. Samples irrigated with 5% calcium hypochlorite demonstrated dentinal microhardness of 42.43±1.62, which is the lowest among all the tested groups, followed by nano chitosan, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine. Samples treated with control group (saline) demonstrated the maximum microhardness of dentin in the present study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this research, it can be concluded that the tested novel irrigating solutions, 5% calcium hypochlorite and 0.2% nanochitosan, were more detrimental to radicular dentin microhardness when compared with conventional endodontic irrigants.</p>","PeriodicalId":73702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","volume":"25 3","pages":"236-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2023.98298.2071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of the problem: During endodontic therapy, irrigation solutions applied in the root canal may affect the physicochemical properties of the dentinal wall, thereby changing its microhardness. This may adversely affect the sealing ability and adhesion of dental materials. Therefore, many studies have focused on the search for an ideal root canal irrigant that has a minimal effect on dentinal microhardness.

Purpose: This in vitro study was conducted to determine the changes in dentin microhardness after root canal irrigation with different endodontic irrigants.

Materials and method: Ninety-five freshly extracted maxillary central incisor teeth with straight single canals were selected. These teeth were sectioned transversely at the level of the cementoenamel junction. The working length of each tooth was determined, and canal space was prepared by the HyFlex CM rotary file system. During instrumentation, normal saline was used for irrigation. Then, teeth were split longitudinally into two segments. According to the irrigating solution employed, samples were divided into five groups (n=19): normal saline (Group A), 3% sodium hypochlorite (Group B), 2% chlorhexidine (Group C), 5% calcium hypochlorite (Group D), and 0.2% nanochitosan (Group E).3 mL of the corresponding irrigating solution was administered for total15 minutes in each prepared sample. The Vickers micro-hardness tester was then used to assess micro-hardness. The data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: All tested irrigating solutions decreased the dentinal microhardness. Samples irrigated with 5% calcium hypochlorite demonstrated dentinal microhardness of 42.43±1.62, which is the lowest among all the tested groups, followed by nano chitosan, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine. Samples treated with control group (saline) demonstrated the maximum microhardness of dentin in the present study.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this research, it can be concluded that the tested novel irrigating solutions, 5% calcium hypochlorite and 0.2% nanochitosan, were more detrimental to radicular dentin microhardness when compared with conventional endodontic irrigants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同牙髓冲洗液对根管牙本质微硬度影响的比较评估:体外研究
问题陈述:在根管治疗过程中,根管内使用的灌洗溶液可能会影响牙本质壁的理化性质,从而改变其微硬度。这可能会对牙科材料的密封能力和附着力产生不利影响。因此,许多研究都集中在寻找一种对牙本质微硬度影响最小的理想根管冲洗剂。目的:本体外研究旨在确定使用不同根管冲洗剂进行根管冲洗后牙本质微硬度的变化:选取了 95 颗新鲜拔出的上颌中切牙,这些牙齿具有笔直的单根根管。这些牙齿在牙本质釉质交界处横向切开。确定每颗牙齿的工作长度,并使用 HyFlex CM 旋转锉系统准备牙管空间。在器械操作过程中,使用生理盐水进行冲洗。然后,将牙齿纵向分成两段。根据使用的冲洗液,样本被分为五组(n=19):生理盐水(A 组)、3% 次氯酸钠(B 组)、2% 洗必泰(C 组)、5% 次氯酸钙(D 组)和 0.2% 纳米壳聚糖(E 组)。然后使用维氏显微硬度计评估显微硬度。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行分析:结果:所有测试的灌洗液都降低了牙本质显微硬度。用 5%次氯酸钙冲洗的样本牙本质显微硬度为 42.43±1.62,是所有测试组中最低的,其次是纳米壳聚糖、次氯酸钠和洗必泰。在本研究中,使用对照组(生理盐水)处理的样本显示出最大的牙本质显微硬度:在本研究的局限性范围内,可以得出结论:与传统的牙髓冲洗剂相比,测试的新型冲洗溶液(5% 次氯酸钙和 0.2% 纳米壳聚糖)对根管牙本质显微硬度的损害更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic Effects of Pulp Capping Agents on Mesenchymal Stem Cells Isolated from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth. Dentition Type as a Determinant of Microbial Load Reduction by Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Deep Dentin Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effect of Cold Plasma on the Penetration Depth of AH26 and Beta Resin Sealers in Dentinal Tubules. Emergency Medications and Equipment Indispensable for Dental Offices and Clinics in Iran. Evaluation of the Effect of Applying Chitosan, Neem, Tulsi, Aloe vera, and Chlorhexidine Solutions on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Dentin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1