Coffee substitutes: A review of the technology, characteristics, application, and future perspective

IF 12 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1111/1541-4337.70041
Sima Tahmouzi, Sara Sanaei Nasab, Behnam Alizadeh-Salmani, Leila Zare, Neda Mollakhalili-Meybodi, Amene Nematollahi
{"title":"Coffee substitutes: A review of the technology, characteristics, application, and future perspective","authors":"Sima Tahmouzi,&nbsp;Sara Sanaei Nasab,&nbsp;Behnam Alizadeh-Salmani,&nbsp;Leila Zare,&nbsp;Neda Mollakhalili-Meybodi,&nbsp;Amene Nematollahi","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite being one of the most frequently consumed beverages worldwide, there are concerns that excessive consumption of coffee can have adverse effects, especially concerning the addictive and stimulating effects of the alkaloid caffeine, which contributes to coffee's popularity. It is known to increase the risk of hypertension and heart rate among predisposed individuals, adversely affecting the nervous system. Even though they differ in nature from those found in coffee, coffee substitutes can be considered economically and health-wise as a favorable alternative to natural coffee brews. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art varieties of plants used as coffee substitutes and discusses their production technology, chemical composition, nutritional properties, health benefits, economic challenges, and rationale for choosing the plant as a substitute for coffee. Various instant products and coffee substitute blends are also available on the market especially based on different kinds of plants and herbs like ginger, rye, date pits, quinoa, lupine, chicory, barley, rye, oak, and so on. These coffee substitutes have several advantages especially having no caffeine and containing different beneficial phytochemicals, although the results of the difference between the levels of harmful compounds in coffee and coffee substitutes were contradictory. Therefore, it is no wonder that the development of coffee substitutes, which are beverages that are able to mimic the taste and aroma of coffee, is on the rise at present.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being one of the most frequently consumed beverages worldwide, there are concerns that excessive consumption of coffee can have adverse effects, especially concerning the addictive and stimulating effects of the alkaloid caffeine, which contributes to coffee's popularity. It is known to increase the risk of hypertension and heart rate among predisposed individuals, adversely affecting the nervous system. Even though they differ in nature from those found in coffee, coffee substitutes can be considered economically and health-wise as a favorable alternative to natural coffee brews. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art varieties of plants used as coffee substitutes and discusses their production technology, chemical composition, nutritional properties, health benefits, economic challenges, and rationale for choosing the plant as a substitute for coffee. Various instant products and coffee substitute blends are also available on the market especially based on different kinds of plants and herbs like ginger, rye, date pits, quinoa, lupine, chicory, barley, rye, oak, and so on. These coffee substitutes have several advantages especially having no caffeine and containing different beneficial phytochemicals, although the results of the difference between the levels of harmful compounds in coffee and coffee substitutes were contradictory. Therefore, it is no wonder that the development of coffee substitutes, which are beverages that are able to mimic the taste and aroma of coffee, is on the rise at present.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咖啡替代品:技术、特点、应用和未来展望综述。
尽管咖啡是全世界最常饮用的饮料之一,但人们担心过量饮用咖啡会产生不良影响,尤其是生物碱咖啡因的成瘾性和刺激作用,这也是咖啡广受欢迎的原因之一。众所周知,咖啡因会增加易感人群患高血压和心率加快的风险,并对神经系统产生不利影响。尽管咖啡替代品的性质与咖啡中的咖啡因不同,但从经济和健康角度来看,它们可以被视为天然咖啡的有利替代品。本综述总结了用作咖啡替代品的最新植物品种,并讨论了它们的生产技术、化学成分、营养特性、健康益处、经济挑战以及选择植物作为咖啡替代品的理由。市场上还有各种速溶产品和咖啡替代品混合物,特别是基于不同种类植物和草药的产品,如生姜、黑麦、枣核、藜麦、羽扇豆、菊苣、大麦、黑麦、橡树等。这些咖啡替代品有许多优点,尤其是不含咖啡因,并含有各种有益的植物化学物质,但咖啡和咖啡替代品中有害化合物含量的差异结果却相互矛盾。因此,难怪目前咖啡替代品的开发呈上升趋势,它们是能够模仿咖啡味道和香气的饮料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Coffee substitutes: A review of the technology, characteristics, application, and future perspective Correction to “Elevating the significance of legume intake: A novel strategy to counter aging-related mitochondrial dysfunction and physical decline” A 10-year (2014–2023) review of complementary food development in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact on child health Consequences of acute and long-term excessive iodine intake: A literature review focusing on seaweed as a potential dietary iodine source Food fraud prevention strategies: Building an effective verification ecosystem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1