Food fraud prevention strategies: Building an effective verification ecosystem

IF 12 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1111/1541-4337.70036
Louise Manning, Andrew MacLeod, Christian James, Mathew Thompson, Samson Oyeyinka, Nick Cowen, Joshua Skoczylis, Bukola A. Onarinde
{"title":"Food fraud prevention strategies: Building an effective verification ecosystem","authors":"Louise Manning,&nbsp;Andrew MacLeod,&nbsp;Christian James,&nbsp;Mathew Thompson,&nbsp;Samson Oyeyinka,&nbsp;Nick Cowen,&nbsp;Joshua Skoczylis,&nbsp;Bukola A. Onarinde","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Food fraud is an ever-present threat that regulators, food business operators (FBOs), and consumers need to be aware of, prevent where possible, and address by developing mitigation strategies to detect and reduce its negative consequences. While extant literature focuses on food fraud detection, there is less attention given to prevention strategies, a knowledge gap this review seeks to address. The aim of this review was to consider food-related fraud prevention initiatives, understand what has worked well, and develop a series of recommendations on preventing food fraud, both policy related and for future research. Reactive (including intelligence based) food fraud detection dominates over prevention strategies, especially where financial, knowledge, and time resources are scarce. First-generation tools have been developed for food fraud vulnerability assessment, risk analysis, and development of food fraud prevention strategies. However, examples of integrated food control management systems at FBO, supply chain, and regulatory levels for prevention are limited. The lack of hybrid (public/private) integration of food fraud prevention strategies, as well as an effective verification ecosystem, weakens existing food fraud prevention plans. While there are several emergent practice models for food fraud prevention, they need to be strengthened to focus more specifically on capable guardians and target hardening. This work has implications for policymakers, Official Controls bodies, the food industry, and ultimately consumers who seek to consistently purchase food that is safe, legal, and authentic.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food fraud is an ever-present threat that regulators, food business operators (FBOs), and consumers need to be aware of, prevent where possible, and address by developing mitigation strategies to detect and reduce its negative consequences. While extant literature focuses on food fraud detection, there is less attention given to prevention strategies, a knowledge gap this review seeks to address. The aim of this review was to consider food-related fraud prevention initiatives, understand what has worked well, and develop a series of recommendations on preventing food fraud, both policy related and for future research. Reactive (including intelligence based) food fraud detection dominates over prevention strategies, especially where financial, knowledge, and time resources are scarce. First-generation tools have been developed for food fraud vulnerability assessment, risk analysis, and development of food fraud prevention strategies. However, examples of integrated food control management systems at FBO, supply chain, and regulatory levels for prevention are limited. The lack of hybrid (public/private) integration of food fraud prevention strategies, as well as an effective verification ecosystem, weakens existing food fraud prevention plans. While there are several emergent practice models for food fraud prevention, they need to be strengthened to focus more specifically on capable guardians and target hardening. This work has implications for policymakers, Official Controls bodies, the food industry, and ultimately consumers who seek to consistently purchase food that is safe, legal, and authentic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食品欺诈预防战略:建立有效的验证生态系统。
食品欺诈是一种无处不在的威胁,监管者、食品企业经营者(FBOs)和消费者都需要认识到这一点,在可能的情况下加以预防,并通过制定缓解策略来检测和减少其负面影响。虽然现有文献侧重于食品欺诈的侦查,但对预防策略的关注较少,本综述试图解决这一知识空白。本综述旨在审议与食品有关的欺诈预防措施,了解哪些措施行之有效,并就预防食品欺诈提出一系列建议,既包括与政策有关的建议,也包括对未来研究的建议。反应式(包括基于情报的)食品欺诈侦查比预防战略占主导地位,特别是在财力、知识和时间资源稀缺的情况下。目前已开发出第一代工具,用于食品欺诈脆弱性评估、风险分析和制定食品欺诈预防战略。然而,在食品运营组织、供应链和监管层面建立综合食品控制管理系统以进行预防的实例却很有限。缺乏食品欺诈预防战略的混合(公共/私营)整合以及有效的验证生态系统,削弱了现有的食品欺诈预防计划。虽然有几种新出现的食品欺诈预防实践模式,但它们需要得到加强,以更具体地关注有能力的监护人和目标硬化。这项工作对政策制定者、官方控制机构、食品行业以及最终消费者都有影响,因为他们希望始终购买到安全、合法和正宗的食品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Coffee substitutes: A review of the technology, characteristics, application, and future perspective Correction to “Elevating the significance of legume intake: A novel strategy to counter aging-related mitochondrial dysfunction and physical decline” A 10-year (2014–2023) review of complementary food development in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact on child health Consequences of acute and long-term excessive iodine intake: A literature review focusing on seaweed as a potential dietary iodine source Food fraud prevention strategies: Building an effective verification ecosystem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1