Time Usage and Satisfaction Based on Occupational Area Between Weekdays and Weekends of Family Caregivers and Non-family Caregivers of Dementia Patients.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.4103/aian.aian_961_23
Woo-Hyuk Jang, Jong-Hwi Park
{"title":"Time Usage and Satisfaction Based on Occupational Area Between Weekdays and Weekends of Family Caregivers and Non-family Caregivers of Dementia Patients.","authors":"Woo-Hyuk Jang, Jong-Hwi Park","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_961_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The number of people with dementia and the burden on families to care for them are increasing. As a result, families are affected in their use of time to carry out daily activities. This study compared family caregivers of dementia patients (dementia family) and non-family caregivers of dementia patients (non-dementia family), reflecting their characteristics on weekdays and weekends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 92 participants each in the groups dementia family and non-dementia family. Each group was divided into 121 people on weekdays and 71 people on weekends. Time usage was measured by occupational area. The variables assessed were \"lack of time,\" \"tiredness,\" \"life satisfaction,\" and \"leisure satisfaction.\" Variables including \"house chores sharing\" and \"role division\" were also assessed. The time usage of the Korea National Statistical Office's 2019 \"time use survey\" was reclassified based on the occupational areas of the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework-Fourth Edition, and time usage and satisfaction were analyzed. Frequency analysis and independent t -test were used for statistical processing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On weekdays, the dementia family showed less time usage in the \"leisure\" area for men and \"social participation\" area for women than the non-dementia family. On weekends, dementia family showed less time usage in the \"activities of daily living\" (ADLs) area than the non-dementia family and women in dementia family showed less time usage in \"ADLs\" area compared to women in the non-dementia family. Satisfaction was found to be higher in terms of \"lack of time\" and \"tiredness\" on weekdays and \"tiredness\" on weekends in dementia family than in the non-dementia family.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Time usage and satisfaction of dementia family and non-dementia family showed differences during weekdays and weekends. These results suggest that for family caregivers of dementia patients, it is necessary to improve the efficient use of time and satisfaction during weekdays and holidays.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_961_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The number of people with dementia and the burden on families to care for them are increasing. As a result, families are affected in their use of time to carry out daily activities. This study compared family caregivers of dementia patients (dementia family) and non-family caregivers of dementia patients (non-dementia family), reflecting their characteristics on weekdays and weekends.

Methods: There were 92 participants each in the groups dementia family and non-dementia family. Each group was divided into 121 people on weekdays and 71 people on weekends. Time usage was measured by occupational area. The variables assessed were "lack of time," "tiredness," "life satisfaction," and "leisure satisfaction." Variables including "house chores sharing" and "role division" were also assessed. The time usage of the Korea National Statistical Office's 2019 "time use survey" was reclassified based on the occupational areas of the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework-Fourth Edition, and time usage and satisfaction were analyzed. Frequency analysis and independent t -test were used for statistical processing.

Results: On weekdays, the dementia family showed less time usage in the "leisure" area for men and "social participation" area for women than the non-dementia family. On weekends, dementia family showed less time usage in the "activities of daily living" (ADLs) area than the non-dementia family and women in dementia family showed less time usage in "ADLs" area compared to women in the non-dementia family. Satisfaction was found to be higher in terms of "lack of time" and "tiredness" on weekdays and "tiredness" on weekends in dementia family than in the non-dementia family.

Conclusions: Time usage and satisfaction of dementia family and non-dementia family showed differences during weekdays and weekends. These results suggest that for family caregivers of dementia patients, it is necessary to improve the efficient use of time and satisfaction during weekdays and holidays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症患者的家庭照护者和非家庭照护者平日和周末的时间使用情况和基于职业领域的满意度。
背景和目标:痴呆症患者的人数和家庭照顾他们的负担都在不断增加。因此,家庭在利用时间进行日常活动方面受到了影响。本研究比较了痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者(痴呆症家庭)和非痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者(非痴呆症家庭),反映了他们在工作日和周末的特点:痴呆症家庭组和非痴呆症家庭组各 92 人。每组平日 121 人,周末 71 人。时间使用情况按职业领域进行测量。评估变量包括 "缺乏时间"、"疲倦"、"生活满意度 "和 "休闲满意度"。此外,还评估了 "家务分担 "和 "角色分工 "等变量。根据《职业治疗实践框架-第四版》的职业领域,对韩国国家统计局 2019 年 "时间利用调查 "的时间利用情况进行了重新分类,并对时间利用情况和满意度进行了分析。统计处理采用频数分析和独立t检验:与非痴呆家庭相比,痴呆家庭男性在 "休闲 "领域和女性在 "社会参与 "领域的时间使用率较低。在周末,痴呆症家庭在 "日常生活活动"(ADLs)方面使用的时间少于非痴呆症家庭,痴呆症家庭中的女性在 "日常生活活动 "方面使用的时间少于非痴呆症家庭中的女性。与非痴呆症家庭相比,痴呆症家庭的女性在 "ADLs "方面的时间使用较少,在 "时间不足 "和 "疲倦 "方面,痴呆症家庭的女性在工作日的满意度较高,在周末的满意度较高:痴呆症家庭和非痴呆症家庭在平日和周末的时间使用情况和满意度存在差异。这些结果表明,对于痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者而言,有必要提高平日和节假日的时间利用效率和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Nervous System Diseases-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
293
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.
期刊最新文献
Propionic Acidemia in a Neonate: The Clues to Early Identification. My Birdsongs in Clinical Neurology. Tadpole Brainstem Atrophy in Adult-Onset Alexander Disease: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease Presenting as Autoimmune Limbic Encephalitis: A Case Report with Review of Literature. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Induced Intracranial Artery Stenosis - A Rare Cause of TIA in a Patient of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1