Comparison of waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in patients supported with total artificial heart versus continuous biventricular assist devices

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Artificial organs Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1111/aor.14884
Joel Ferrall, Ajay S. Vaidya, Eric S. Kawaguchi, Sanjeet G. Patel, Raymond C. Lee, Emily S. Lee, Aaron M. Wolfson
{"title":"Comparison of waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in patients supported with total artificial heart versus continuous biventricular assist devices","authors":"Joel Ferrall,&nbsp;Ajay S. Vaidya,&nbsp;Eric S. Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Sanjeet G. Patel,&nbsp;Raymond C. Lee,&nbsp;Emily S. Lee,&nbsp;Aaron M. Wolfson","doi":"10.1111/aor.14884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Durable biventricular support may be necessary to bridge patients with end-stage biventricular failure to heart transplantation. This study compares waitlist and post-transplant outcomes between patients supported with continuous flow, durable biventricular assist devices (BiVAD), and total artificial heart (TAH).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using the UNOS registry, we analyzed adult (≥18 years old), first-time transplant candidates with TAH or BiVAD at the time of listing or transplantation from 10/1/2010–10/31/2020, with follow-up through 3/31/2022. Multivariable proportional subdistribution hazards models and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare death/deterioration or heart transplantation on the waitlist between cohorts. Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate one-year post-transplant survival and evaluate difference in outcomes based on annual transplant center volume.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The waitlist cohort included a total of 228 patients (25% BiVAD). Waitlist outcomes between device types were similar. The transplanted cohort included a total of 352 patients (25% BiVAD). There was a trend towards worse one-year post-transplant survival in patients bridged with TAH versus BiVAD (log-rank <i>p</i>-value = 0.072) that persisted after adjusting for age, gender, policy, and removing dual-organ recipients (HR 1.94 (0.94, 3.98) <i>p</i>-value = 0.07). There was a difference in one-year post-transplant survival amongst TAH-bridged patients when stratified by annual transplant center volume (log-rank <i>p</i>-value = 0.013). One-year post-transplant survival between TAH-supported patients from high annual transplant volume centers and BiVAD-supported patients was similar (<i>p</i>-value = 0.815).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>BiVAD and TAH are reasonable support strategies with TAH implantation at high-volume transplant centers (51+ transplants/year) having similar 1-year post-transplant survival to BiVAD-supported patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":"49 2","pages":"281-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aor.14884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Durable biventricular support may be necessary to bridge patients with end-stage biventricular failure to heart transplantation. This study compares waitlist and post-transplant outcomes between patients supported with continuous flow, durable biventricular assist devices (BiVAD), and total artificial heart (TAH).

Methods

Using the UNOS registry, we analyzed adult (≥18 years old), first-time transplant candidates with TAH or BiVAD at the time of listing or transplantation from 10/1/2010–10/31/2020, with follow-up through 3/31/2022. Multivariable proportional subdistribution hazards models and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare death/deterioration or heart transplantation on the waitlist between cohorts. Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate one-year post-transplant survival and evaluate difference in outcomes based on annual transplant center volume.

Results

The waitlist cohort included a total of 228 patients (25% BiVAD). Waitlist outcomes between device types were similar. The transplanted cohort included a total of 352 patients (25% BiVAD). There was a trend towards worse one-year post-transplant survival in patients bridged with TAH versus BiVAD (log-rank p-value = 0.072) that persisted after adjusting for age, gender, policy, and removing dual-organ recipients (HR 1.94 (0.94, 3.98) p-value = 0.07). There was a difference in one-year post-transplant survival amongst TAH-bridged patients when stratified by annual transplant center volume (log-rank p-value = 0.013). One-year post-transplant survival between TAH-supported patients from high annual transplant volume centers and BiVAD-supported patients was similar (p-value = 0.815).

Conclusions

BiVAD and TAH are reasonable support strategies with TAH implantation at high-volume transplant centers (51+ transplants/year) having similar 1-year post-transplant survival to BiVAD-supported patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用全人工心脏和连续双心室辅助装置的患者等待名单和移植后结果的比较。
背景:持久的双心室支持可能是终末期双心室衰竭患者接受心脏移植的必要桥梁。本研究比较了使用持续流、持久双心室辅助装置(BiVAD)和全人工心脏(TAH)支持的患者的候选结果和移植后结果:我们使用 UNOS 注册表分析了 2010 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日期间首次接受移植手术的成人(≥18 岁)患者,他们在被列入名单或接受移植手术时使用 TAH 或 BiVAD,随访至 2022 年 3 月 31 日。采用多变量比例子分布危险模型和特定病因 Cox 比例危险模型来比较不同队列之间的死亡/病情恶化或等待名单上的心脏移植情况。Kaplan-Meier 模型和多变量 Cox 比例危险模型用于评估移植后一年的存活率,并根据移植中心的年工作量评估结果的差异:候选队列共包括228名患者(25%为BiVAD)。不同设备类型的候选结果相似。移植组共包括 352 名患者(25% 为 BiVAD)。与 BiVAD 相比,使用 TAH 进行桥接的患者移植后一年生存率呈下降趋势(对数秩 p 值 = 0.072),在调整年龄、性别、政策和去除双器官受者后,这一趋势依然存在(HR 1.94 (0.94, 3.98) p 值 = 0.07)。根据移植中心的年工作量进行分层后,TAH桥接患者的移植后一年生存率存在差异(对数秩p值=0.013)。年移植量大的移植中心的 TAH 支持患者与 BiVAD 支持患者的移植后一年生存率相似(P 值 = 0.815):结论:BiVAD和TAH是合理的支持策略,在高移植量中心(每年51例以上移植)植入TAH的患者与BiVAD支持的患者移植后1年生存率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
期刊最新文献
Reoperative Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion Following Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Less Invasive Versus Sternotomy Approach. Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients Supported by Left Ventricular Assist Device. Association of Left Ventricular Size on Outcomes in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Comparison of Open Albumin Dialysis (OPAL) With Prometheus Fractionated Plasma Separation and Adsorption (FPSA) and Standard Medical Treatment for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1