Fitness to stand trial: 415 consecutive defendants assessed by a New Zealand forensic psychiatry service.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Australasian Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1177/10398562241290027
Amber Wakefield, Susanna Every-Palmer, James A Foulds
{"title":"Fitness to stand trial: 415 consecutive defendants assessed by a New Zealand forensic psychiatry service.","authors":"Amber Wakefield, Susanna Every-Palmer, James A Foulds","doi":"10.1177/10398562241290027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New Zealand defendants found unfit to stand trial following a Court-ordered forensic mental health assessment cannot be detained in prison and must either be released, or made subject to a mental health or intellectual disability order. There is increasing awareness of the need to identify these people and protect their rights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective audit of 8 years of Court-ordered health assessor reports addressing fitness to stand trial prepared by a New Zealand regional forensic mental health service with a catchment area of around 850,000.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2014 and 2022, Courts referred 415 defendants for assessment of fitness to stand trial. The number of reports requested increased by 20% between 2014 and 2022. Report subjects were 81% male and had a median age of 31. Commonest primary diagnoses were psychotic disorders (37%), intellectual disability (13%) and acquired neurocognitive disorders (15%). Few people with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder were identified. Despite the increase in assessments, the number of defendants considered unfit by report writers remained stable over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increasing number of referrals for assessment of fitness to stand trial has resourcing implications for forensic mental health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241290027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New Zealand defendants found unfit to stand trial following a Court-ordered forensic mental health assessment cannot be detained in prison and must either be released, or made subject to a mental health or intellectual disability order. There is increasing awareness of the need to identify these people and protect their rights.

Methods: Retrospective audit of 8 years of Court-ordered health assessor reports addressing fitness to stand trial prepared by a New Zealand regional forensic mental health service with a catchment area of around 850,000.

Results: Between 2014 and 2022, Courts referred 415 defendants for assessment of fitness to stand trial. The number of reports requested increased by 20% between 2014 and 2022. Report subjects were 81% male and had a median age of 31. Commonest primary diagnoses were psychotic disorders (37%), intellectual disability (13%) and acquired neurocognitive disorders (15%). Few people with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder were identified. Despite the increase in assessments, the number of defendants considered unfit by report writers remained stable over time.

Conclusion: The increasing number of referrals for assessment of fitness to stand trial has resourcing implications for forensic mental health services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受审资格:新西兰法医精神病学服务机构连续对415名被告进行了评估。
背景:经法院下令进行法医精神健康评估后发现不适合接受审判的新西兰被告不能被拘留在监狱中,而必须被释放,或被下达精神健康或智力残疾令。人们越来越意识到有必要识别这些人并保护他们的权利:方法:对新西兰一家地区性法医精神健康服务机构(服务范围约为 85 万人)8 年来所编写的法院命令健康评估师报告进行回顾性审计,以解决受审资格问题:结果:2014 年至 2022 年间,法院转介了 415 名被告进行受审资格评估。从 2014 年到 2022 年,申请报告的数量增加了 20%。报告对象中81%为男性,年龄中位数为31岁。最常见的主要诊断是精神病(37%)、智力障碍(13%)和获得性神经认知障碍(15%)。胎儿酒精谱系障碍患者很少。尽管评估数量有所增加,但报告撰写者认为不适合的被告人数在一段时间内保持稳定:结论:评估被告是否适合受审的转介数量不断增加,对法医心理健康服务的资源配置产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
期刊最新文献
Violence and nicotine replacement therapy in a high dependency mental health unit. Acute stress exposure in healthy oil and gas field workers and early post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms: A lesson from the COVID-19 crisis. Ten years gone: Response to Cavve (2024). Psychiatrists should champion the care of those with severe mental illnesses experiencing climate change-related heat stress. Establishing a psychiatry clinic within an Australian publicly funded specialist obesity service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1