A national evaluation of QbTest to support ADHD assessment: a real-world, mixed methods approach.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11693-7
Sophie S Hall, Caitlin McKenzie, Louise Thomson, Benji-Rose Ingall, Madeleine J Groom, Nicole McGlennon, Mark Dines-Allen, Charlotte L Hall
{"title":"A national evaluation of QbTest to support ADHD assessment: a real-world, mixed methods approach.","authors":"Sophie S Hall, Caitlin McKenzie, Louise Thomson, Benji-Rose Ingall, Madeleine J Groom, Nicole McGlennon, Mark Dines-Allen, Charlotte L Hall","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11693-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>QbTest is a commercially available, computerised test of attention, impulsivity, and activity designed to assist with the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Health Innovation East Midlands (formerly East Midlands AHSN), led the implementation of the QbTest on behalf of the 15 Health Innovation Networks across Child and Adolescent Mental Health services (CAMHS) and Paediatric sites in England between April 2020 and March 2023. We evaluate the impact of this programme on diagnostic assessment at participating sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was used including: case-note data collected on 10-30 cases per site pre and post QbTest implementation; interviews with healthcare staff working with QbTest; and surveys to explore perspectives of healthcare staff and patients/carers. Case-note data was descriptively analysed to compare time to diagnosis (number of appointments and days) pre/post QbTest implementation. Survey data was analysed descriptively. Qualitative interview data was explored using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case-note data was provided by 20 sites across England. Comparison of mean values pre- and post-QbTest implementation identified a decrease of 0.37 (11.5%) in number of appointments to reach a diagnostic decision, a 55-day (12.5%) increase in days from initial referral to diagnosis, and a 12-day (10.3%) increase in days to reach a diagnostic decision. Exploratory analyses indicated greater benefit for Paediatric services over CAMHS, in terms of a decrease in days from referral to diagnosis and number of appointments to diagnosis. Interviews with healthcare staff (n=21) revealed that the QbTest was perceived to support a faster, more efficient diagnostic process. Survey data (n=65 healthcare staff, n=22 patients/carers) identified that the QbTest helped patients understand their symptoms and the diagnostic decision.  Although some logistical issues (e.g., room requirements) and patient issues (e.g., sensory sensitivity) were identified, healthcare staff considered that QbTest was easily incorporated into the ADHD assessment pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The national implementation of QbTest in ADHD clinics resulted in a small reduction in the number of clinical appointments needed to reach a diagnostic decision, with greatest benefit demonstrated in Paediatric sites. Data were impacted by COVID-19 therefore, further evaluation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11693-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: QbTest is a commercially available, computerised test of attention, impulsivity, and activity designed to assist with the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Health Innovation East Midlands (formerly East Midlands AHSN), led the implementation of the QbTest on behalf of the 15 Health Innovation Networks across Child and Adolescent Mental Health services (CAMHS) and Paediatric sites in England between April 2020 and March 2023. We evaluate the impact of this programme on diagnostic assessment at participating sites.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used including: case-note data collected on 10-30 cases per site pre and post QbTest implementation; interviews with healthcare staff working with QbTest; and surveys to explore perspectives of healthcare staff and patients/carers. Case-note data was descriptively analysed to compare time to diagnosis (number of appointments and days) pre/post QbTest implementation. Survey data was analysed descriptively. Qualitative interview data was explored using thematic analysis.

Results: Case-note data was provided by 20 sites across England. Comparison of mean values pre- and post-QbTest implementation identified a decrease of 0.37 (11.5%) in number of appointments to reach a diagnostic decision, a 55-day (12.5%) increase in days from initial referral to diagnosis, and a 12-day (10.3%) increase in days to reach a diagnostic decision. Exploratory analyses indicated greater benefit for Paediatric services over CAMHS, in terms of a decrease in days from referral to diagnosis and number of appointments to diagnosis. Interviews with healthcare staff (n=21) revealed that the QbTest was perceived to support a faster, more efficient diagnostic process. Survey data (n=65 healthcare staff, n=22 patients/carers) identified that the QbTest helped patients understand their symptoms and the diagnostic decision.  Although some logistical issues (e.g., room requirements) and patient issues (e.g., sensory sensitivity) were identified, healthcare staff considered that QbTest was easily incorporated into the ADHD assessment pathway.

Conclusion: The national implementation of QbTest in ADHD clinics resulted in a small reduction in the number of clinical appointments needed to reach a diagnostic decision, with greatest benefit demonstrated in Paediatric sites. Data were impacted by COVID-19 therefore, further evaluation is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
QbTest 支持多动症评估的全国性评估:一种真实世界的混合方法。
背景介绍QbTest 是一种商用计算机化的注意力、冲动和活动测试,旨在帮助诊断注意力缺陷多动障碍 (ADHD)。在 2020 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月期间,东米德兰健康创新网络(前身为东米德兰 AHSN)代表英格兰 15 个健康创新网络在儿童和青少年心理健康服务 (CAMHS) 及儿科领域牵头实施 QbTest。我们将评估该计划对参与地点诊断评估的影响:我们采用了一种混合方法,包括:在 QbTest 实施前和实施后,每个医疗点收集 10-30 个病例的病例记录数据;采访使用 QbTest 的医护人员;以及调查医护人员和患者/护理人员的观点。对病例记录数据进行了描述性分析,以比较实施 QbTest 前后的诊断时间(预约次数和天数)。对调查数据进行了描述性分析。对定性访谈数据进行了主题分析:英格兰有 20 个医疗点提供了病例记录数据。对实施 QbTest 前后的平均值进行比较后发现,做出诊断决定的预约次数减少了 0.37 次(11.5%),从最初转诊到做出诊断的天数增加了 55 天(12.5%),做出诊断决定的天数增加了 12 天(10.3%)。探索性分析表明,在减少从转诊到确诊的天数和预约到确诊的次数方面,儿科服务比儿童心理保健服务获益更大。与医护人员(人数=21)的访谈显示,QbTest 被认为能支持更快、更有效的诊断过程。调查数据(n=65 名医护人员,n=22 名患者/护理人员)表明,QbTest 有助于患者了解自己的症状和诊断决定。 虽然发现了一些后勤问题(如房间要求)和患者问题(如感官敏感性),但医护人员认为 QbTest 很容易被纳入多动症评估流程:结论:在全国范围内的 ADHD 诊所实施 QbTest 后,做出诊断决定所需的临床预约次数略有减少,其中儿科诊所受益最大。数据受到 COVID-19 的影响,因此需要进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Employer support for health and social care registered professionals, their patients and service users involved in regulatory fitness to practise regulatory proceedings. Factors influencing the turnover intention for disease control and prevention workers in Northeast China: an empirical analysis based on logistic-ISM model. Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia. Supporting young people through the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a multi-site qualitative longitudinal study. The potential promise and pitfalls of point-of-care viral load monitoring to expedite HIV treatment decision-making in rural Uganda: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1